Tetrapod Zoology

ResearchBlogging.org

Yay, more vesper bats! The groups we’ve looked at so far have – in anatomical terms – been pretty conservative. This time round we’re looking at a really remarkable group; as is so often the case, their familiarity (relative to so many others of the world’s bats) means that we tend to forget or ignore how remarkable they are. Ordinarily, you might balk at the idea of a mammal whose ears are longer than the combined length of its head and body. Yet this is exactly what we have in the long-eared bats (or, in the Plecotus species at least). Yes, welcome to the world of… yeah, long-eared bats, or plecotins…

i-af01968a19388b5c94c5d70d2d353c0c-plecotin-montage-Mar-2011-490-px.jpg

This small group of vesper bat genera are alike in – by now I think it’s obvious – possessing proportionally enormous ears that are often joined at their bases. The auditory bullae are also unusually large, large glands (termed pararhinal glands) tend to be present on the snout and face, and the premolars are reduced in size (and sometimes absent). This reduction and occasional absence of premolars once led some authors (Tate 1942) to regard plecotins as myotines (that is, as especially close relatives of the mouse-eared or myotis bats). However, molecular phylogenies tend to find them as the ‘most basal’ lineage within Vespertilioninae, the vesper bat clade that also includes serotines, pipistrelles and noctules (e.g., Volleth & Heller 1994, Roehrs et al. 2010). [Composite image above shows - l to r - P. sardus (by Mauro Mucedda, from wikipedia), skull of the Ethiopian long-eared bat P. balensis (from Kruskop & Lavrenchenko (2000)), and Western barbastelle Barbastella barbastellus].

i-19f6ca5d1d4dea745bd2e2167a717191-Tumlison-&-Douglas-1992-plecotin-phylogeny-Mar-2011.jpg

Morphological and molecular studies find ‘core plecotins’ to be monophyletic
(e.g., Leniec et al. 1987, Frost & Timm 1992, Bogdanowicz et al. 1998) – the adjacent cladogram (from Tumlison & Douglas (1992)) shows a possible phylogeny for the taxa involved. But the monophyly of all taxa conventionally allied with Plecotus has never been established; indeed, there are some indications that they form a paraphyletic assemblage to some of the remainder of Vespertilioninae (Volleth & Heller 1994, Hoofer & Van Den Bussche 2003, Roehrs et al. 2010, Agnarsson et al. 2011), in particular to the hairy-tailed bats or lasiurins.

Here in Europe, the familiar long-eared bats are those included in Plecotus. About 11 species are currently recognised (Spitzenberger et al. 2006) (for discussion of some of the more recently named European ones, see Hidden in plain sight: discovering cryptic vesper bats in the European biota); they occur from the Canary Islands and Cape Verde Islands in the west all the way to Japan in the east, occurring across Eurasia as well as in coastal north Africa.

American long-eared bats

i-5c33073e24807bdffec09a0287c49c24-Corynorhinus-townsendii-Naish-Mar-2011.jpg

A small group of American vesper bats with long ears were often included within Plecotus but are now generally classified on their own as Corynorhinus. They’re known as the American long-eared bats, big-eared bats or lump-nosed bats. They do look much like the Plecotus species, but have a longer, more dorsally convex rostrum, a more bulbous cranium and a narrower, more blade-like tragus. The adjacent drawing shows the head of Townsend’s big-eared bat C. townsendii, specifically the Ozark subspecies C. t. ingens. Note the huge, bulbous pararhinal glands. The same species is shown in flight below [image by US Bureau of Land Management, from wikipedia].

i-15d08eeb799817bf0c1a23d380794f49-Corynorhinus-townsendii-BLM-wikipedia-Mar-2011.jpg

Like Plecotus bats, American long-eared bats often hover and they’re able to pick arthropod prey off foliage and the walls of buildings. Fossils identified as Corynorhinus are known from the Late Miocene, Pliocene and Early Pleistocene of Europe (Topál 1989, Spitzenberger et al. 2006); Plecotus itself is known from the Early Pliocene onwards, but its lineage presumably extends back to the Miocene as well (Topál 1989). Plecotins as a whole seem to go back to the Early Oligocene if Quinetia misonnei from Belgium has been correctly identified (Horáček 2001).

Allen’s big-eared bat and the Spotted bat

The southwestern US and Mexico are inhabited by another big-eared vesper bat once included within Plecotus: Allen’s big-eared bat or the Lappet-eared bat Idionycteris phyllotis (in contrast to many of the species I’m covering in this series, there are loads of photos of it online). A denizen of wooded mountainous areas, it possesses paired fleshy lappets that project over the forehead from the bases of the ears. Allen’s big-eared bat shares osteological characters with Plecotus and the Spotted bat or Pinto bat Euderma maculatum (these include a postorbital expansion of the zygomatic arch, an anteriorly rounded auditory bulla and single-rooted lower fourth premolar), and morphology-based analyses have found Idionycteris and Euderma to be sister-taxa, with Plecotus, Corynorhinus and Barbastella successively more distant (Tumlison & Douglas 1992). Despite this strong anatomical similarity, DNA-based phylogenies have found Allen’s big-eared bat to be the sister-taxon to the enormous clade that includes unambiguous plecotins and all other vespertilionines (Roehrs et al. 2010).

The remarkable Spotted bat or Pinto bat is another American member of this big-eared vesper bat group. Unknown until 1890, its presence was only confirmed in Canada, Oregon and Colorado in 1980 and it’s been described by some authors as North America’s rarest mammal (Nowak 1999). Its colouration is really striking: the ground colour of the body fur is reddish brown to black, the underside is white, and there are three large white spots on its dorsal side – one on each shoulder, and one over the small of the back. The painting of this bat below is by Carel Brest van Kempen (of Rigor Vitae) and appears here with permission.

i-e81bf7746c5c83202e30f8e25b995263-Carel-Brest-van-Kempen-Euderma-Mar-2011.jpg

Unlike other Plecotus-like bats, the Spotted bat seems not to be a slow-flying gleaner, but a fast-flying, high-level hunter. A mummified specimen, carbon-dated to about 9100 years old (and hence to the early Holocene), has been discovered in a cave in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona (Mead & Mikesic 2001). It has all its fur and wing membranes preserved.

Barbastelles: short-eared long-eared bats?

i-93e57d3df80bc67c19dfc7d9a643096d-barbastelle-Corsica-Nature-Mar-2011.jpg

The barbastelles (Barbastella) are also similar to Plecotus and likely closely related to them [adjacent photo of B. barbastellus from Corsica Nature]. Barbastelle ears are nowhere near as long as those of Plecotus or Corynorhinus, but they’re very large: so large that the small eyes are surrounded by the ear’s bases. Because some chromosomal studies have found barbastelles to be closer to Plecotus and Corynorhinus, or to Plecotus and Otonycteris, than to other plecotins, the possibility exists that barbastelle ears are reduced relative to their ancestral state (Qumsiyeh & Bickham 1993, Volleth & Heller 1994). Alternatively, gigantic ears evolved at least twice among plecotins.

Barbastelles have very long fur and are typically very dark, being dark brown or black (a very unusual colour for a bat, despite what cartoons show). The hairs are ‘frosted’, with yellowish or creamish tips. Hair extends onto the wing and tail membranes and the face is extremely short and flat. Those pararhinal glands on the snout are particularly large, as they are in Corynorhinus. Despite their affinity to Plecotus, barbastelles (like the Spotted bat) seem to be aerial hawkers, though they may also practise some gleaning. They seem to be specialist predators of moths and are reportedly very cold-tolerant.

The best-known barbastelle is the mostly European B. barbastellus. A second species, B. leucomelas, supposedly occurs across Asia from the Caucasus to Japan and central China, and has also been reported from the Sinai Peninsula and Eritrea. A third species, B. beijingensis, was named from China in 2007 (Zhang et al. 2007). It’s larger than the other barbastelles and with more prominent canines and upper fourth premolars. Recently it’s been suggested that B. leucomelas is actually at least two species and that the name B. leucomelas should be restricted to the barbastelles of the Sinai Peninsula and its surrounds (Zhang et al. 2007, Benda et al. 2008); the remainder should be known as B. darjelingensis (Benda & Mlíkovsk‎ý 2008). Barbastelles were recently reported from Laos and Vietnam (the species status of these populations is uncertain, but they might be B. darjelingensis) (Kruskop & Shchinov 2010). It might be that barbastelles are present – but so far overlooked – throughout the Asian tropics.

Tropical long-eared bats or African long-eared bats – not really long-eared bats at all

i-ea5c882f9b2a1bad09f41e7484efc956-Laephotis-botswanae-Naish-drawing-Mar-2011.jpg

There’s also a group of endemic African bats with long ears: the Laephotis species, sometimes called tropical long-eared bats or African long-eared bats. Until recently I had assumed that they were morphologically very similar to Plecotus and kin, in part because a particularly well known writer and artist specialising on African mammals makes this appears so in his published work… but it ain’t the case. Laephotis bats much resemble the North American Histiotus species (we’ll get to them later) and have often been classified together with them in a ‘histiotine’ group. However, it’s now evident that the two aren’t close at all: Histiotus is most likely a serotine while Laephotis seems to be part of the hypsugine clade, probably being closest to the African Neoromicia species (Stadelmann et al. 2004, Roehrs et al. 2010, Agnarsson et al. 2011).

This means that any similarities between African long-eared bats and true, plecotin long-eared bats are convergent. That’s ok, since Laephotis doesn’t look much like plecotins in detail: as you can see from my drawing here of L. namibensis, the muzzle is longer, the eyes look smaller, and the ears lack a midline connection and are altogether different from those of plecotins.

Little is known about African long-eared bats: they’ve most often been reported from savannah habitats, high-altitude grassland or scrubland (typically roosting under bark). The populations of more arid habitats are often quite pale-furred. The fact that some specimens have been observed above or close to standing water led Stanley & Kock (2004) to suggest that members of this group might be regular drinkers: I have no idea how common drinking is in bats, but I don’t think anybody does… at least, not for obscure species like these. While four species are currently recognised (all of which were named in the 20th century: two in 1971), there has been considerable confusion as to which species some populations belong, and morphometric studies have failed to convincingly separate L. namibensis and L. wintoni (Kearney & Seamark 2005).

Ok, you could argue that Laephotis shouldn’t have been discussed here but elsewhere in the series. But anyway, that’s most – but not all – of the plecotins/plecotin-type vesper bats out of the way. Coming next: desert long-eared bats… the ones that look scary.

For previous Tet Zoo articles in the vesper bats series, see…

And for previous Tet Zoo articles on bats, see…

Refs – –

Agnarsson, I., Zambrana-Torrelio, C. M., Flores-Saldana, N. P. & May-Collado, L. J. 2011. A time-calibrated species-level phylogeny of bats (Chiroptera, Mammalia). PLoS Currents 011 February 4; 3: RRN1212. doi: 10.1371/currents.RRN1212.

Benda, P., Dietz, C., Andreas, M., Hotový, J., Lučan, R. K., Maltby, A., Meakin K., Truscott J. & Vallo, P. 2008: Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) of the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. Part 6. Bats of Sinai (Egypt) with some taxonomic, ecological and echolocation notes on that fauna. Acta Societatis Zoologicae Bohemicae 72, 1-103.

– . & Mlíkovsk‎ý, J. 2008. Nomenclatural notes on the Asian forms of Barbastella bats (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Lynx (Praha), new series 39, 31-46.

Bogdanowicz, W., Kasper, S., Owen, R., & Bogdanowicz, W. (1998). Phylogeny of Plecotine Bats: Reevaluation of Morphological and Chromosomal Data Journal of Mammalogy, 79 (1) DOI: 10.2307/1382843

Frost, D. R. & Timm, R. M. 1992. Phylogeny of plecotine bats (Chiroptera: “Vespertilionidae”): proposal of a logically consistent taxonomy. American Museum Novitates 3034, 1-16.

Hoofer, S. R. & Van Den Bussche, R. A. 2003. Molecular phylogenetics of the chiropteran family Vespertilionidae. Acta Chiropterologica 5, 1-63.

Horáček, I. 2001. On the early history of vespertilionid bats in Europe: the Lower Miocene record from the Bohemian Massif. Lynx (Praha), new series 32, 123-154.

Kearney, T. C. & Seamark, E. C. J. 2005. Morphometric analysis of cranial and external characters of Laephotis Thomas, 1901 (Mammalia: Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) from southern Africa. Annals of the Transvaal Museum 42, 71-87.

Kruskop, S. V. & Lavrenchenko, L. A. 2000. A new species of long-eared bat (Plecotus; Vespertilionidae, Mammalia) from Ethiopia. Myotis 38, 5-17.

– . & Shchinov, A. V. 2010. New remarkable bat records in Hoang Lien Son mountain range, northern Vietnam. Russian Journal of Theriology 9, 1-8.

Leniec, H., Fedyk, S. & Ruprecht, A. L. 1987. Chromosomes of some species of vespertilionid bats. IV. New data on the plecotine bats. Acta Theriologica 32, 307-314.

Mead, J. I. & Mikesic, D. G. 2001. First fossil record of Euderma maculatum (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). The Southwestern Naturalist 46, 380-383.

Nowak, R. M. 1999. Walker’s Mammals of the World, Sixth Edition. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London.

Qumsiyeh, M. B. & Bickham, J. W. 1993. Chromosomes and relationships of long-eared bats of the genera Plecotus and Otonycteris. Journal of Mammalogy 74, 376-382.

Roehrs, Z. P., Lack, J. B. & Van Den Bussche, R. A. 2010. Tribal phylogenetic relationships within Vespertilioninae (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) based on mitochondrial and nuclear sequence data. Journal of Mammalogy 91, 1073-1092.

Spitzenberger, F., Strelkov, P. P., Winkler, H. & Haring, E. 2006. A preliminary revision of the genus Plecotus (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) based on genetic and morphological results. Zoologica Scripta 35, 187-230.

Stadelmann, B., Jacobs, D. S., Schoeman, C. & Ruedi, M. 2004. Phylogeny of African Myotis bats (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) inferred from cytochrome b sequences. Acta Chiropterologica 6, 177-192.

Stanley, W. T. & Kock, D. 2004. New records and notes on Laephotis Thomas, 1901 (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Mammalian Biology 69, 173-181.

Tate, G. H. H. 1942. Results of the Archbold expeditions. No. 47. Review of the vespetilionine bats, with special attention to genera and species in the Archold collection. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 80, 221-297.

Topál, G. 1989. Tertiary and Early Quaternary remains of Corynorhinus and Plecotus from Hungary (Mammalia, Chiroptera). Vertebrata Hungarica 23, 33-55.

Tumlison, R. & Douglas, M. E. 1992. Parsimony analysis and the phylogeny of the plecotine bats (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Journal of Mammalogy 73, 276-285.

Volleth, M. & Heller, K.-G. 1994. Karyosystematics of plecotine bats: a reevaluation of chromosomal data. Journal of Mammalogy 75, 416-419.

Zhang, J.-S., Han, N.-J., Jones, G., Lin, L.-K., Zhang, J.-P., Zhu, G.-J., Huang, D.-W. & Zhang, S.-Y., 2007. A new species of Barbastella (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) from North China. Journal of Mammalogy 88, 1393-1403.

Comments

  1. #1 Surroundx
    March 25, 2011

    No recently extinct species. Hurray!

  2. #2 Darren Naish
    March 25, 2011

    Not yet :) (though note that data is deficient on a few species, like the rare and restricted Plecotus christii). I would love to pitch an article on ‘the quest for crypto-bats’ to a mainstream publisher (concentrating on possibly extinct or only-known-from-a-single-specimen species), if only it had enough appeal…

  3. #3 Dan Milton
    March 25, 2011

    The Spotted Bat (Euderma maculatum) has indeed been called North America’s rarest bat. However, it appears to be not rare but simply hard to observe because of its habits.
    From the Bat Conservation International site:
    “From its first scientific discovery in 1891 until 1965, only 35 specimens were known to science. Even now, it is one of America’s least known animals, but the rarity with which it is observed likely does not reflect its true status in nature. Its habits and choice of roosting sites high in cliff crevices make the spotted bat difficult to observe and unlikely to be harmed by humans. This bat appears to feed almost exclusively on moths, which it captures high above the ground. It is one of the few bats that uses echolocation frequencies low enough to be audible to humans.”

  4. #4 Anonymous
    March 25, 2011

    A book on crypto-bats would be rather interesting. I would certainly get it. Perhaps you just need to word it in a way that makes it more interesting to the layman.

  5. #5 heteromeles
    March 25, 2011

    Personally, I’d push more for a book on bat hunting styles.

    After all, look how much press stealth jet fighters get? You could have a lot of fun talking about the different kinds of echolocation and wings, and how the prey evolved countermeasures.

    I did a bit of paper research on bats on a previous job, and I remember reading up on many of these American species. The spotted bat’s weird in many ways, because it doesn’t have the wings or ears normally associated with a high flying aerial predator.

    My guess was that the spotted bat strategy only works because they are rare. Other bats are the primary predators on spotted bats’ moth prey, and these other bats are the primary evolutionary drivers for moth predator-detection. Spotted bats use unusual echolocation frequencies that the moths have trouble detecting. This strategy only works because other, more common bats are driving moth detectors away from the range the rare spotted bats work in.

    It’s analogous to the technological duels of radar vs. jets, and I wonder if it could be written up that way.

  6. #6 Andreas Johansson
    March 25, 2011

    myotines

    Eytmologically, this ought probably have been “myotidines”, the stem of otis being otid-.

  7. #7 Jerzy
    March 25, 2011

    Am I right that most small mammals are able to hear bat sonar? If so, this further restricts the ecological niches of bats away from predators of mammals.

    BTW, Darren, again i feel that you leave the best bit away. Bats have fascinating ecology, with bird-like mating songs, harems, migrations, weird feeding strategies, weird roosting sites…

  8. #8 Tayo
    March 25, 2011

    That sounds like a whole new series … chiropteran behavior and ecology. Looking forward to the rest of the vesper bat series … and maybe some more on carnivory in chiropterans.

  9. #9 David Marjanović
    March 25, 2011

    Qinetia misonnei

    I bet there’s a u in there.

    Horácěk

    Horáček.

  10. #10 Sven DiMilo
    March 25, 2011

    Bats have fascinating ecology

    WFTS

  11. #11 Darren Naish
    March 25, 2011

    Jerzy (comment 7): always with the positive comments! Unless I’m mistaken, I could have sworn that I was covering the fascinating ecology in the articles. It’s true that I haven’t mentioning swarming or mating songs, but some of the stuff you allude to has been discussed (e.g., migration). Anyway, you do know the series is not exactly finished yet, right?

  12. #12 Darren Naish
    March 25, 2011

    Qinetia: I followed the spelling given by Spitzenberger et al. (2006), but David is right (comment 9) and it is actually Quinetia. While googling I learnt that the same name is also in use for a daisy.

  13. #13 Chris
    March 25, 2011

    You’re making me nostalgic for my college days when I volunteered to help with a professor’s bat work :)

    I thought it was fascinating, but I also came away from the experience with a totally unscientific reaction to bats: I think they’re pretty darn cute.

    I was especially charmed by Corynorhinus, because, (IIRC) when they aren’t actively using their ears (such as when sleeping) the ears are folded and coiled at the sides of the head, resembling tiny rams’ horns.

  14. #14 abadidea
    March 25, 2011

    I think you could totally pitch “the secret world of cryptobats” as a long article for a magazine. Maybe team up with Kakalios for a little bit of Batman pizazz.

  15. #15 Tim Morris
    March 26, 2011

    I have a remarkable skill of being able to hear the lower end of some bat calls, being a young adult, I assume I will eventually lose this ability. I can tell that they are bats, because the calls get stronger coming close and then fade away, as it flies past.

  16. #16 David Marjanović
    March 26, 2011

    I have a remarkable skill of being able to hear the lower end of some bat calls

    I think that’s normal. They sound like opening your lips (not your jaws) and moving your tongue back and forth, clicking and smacking, sort of.

  17. #17 heteromeles
    March 26, 2011

    Actually, both my mother (past retirement age) and I can still hear bat calls, although most of our friends cannot.

    It’s not genetics exactly, it’s that both of us hate earphones and enjoy listening to music with the volume low.

    The only reason I point this out is that my teenaged nieces and nephews think that hearing loss is both inevitable and normal. It is neither. Rather, it’s a case of the bad becoming normal, with bad being defined as cranking the volume just because that’s what one does.

    While I’m not against the occasional loud concert, I’d rather people made conscious choices about their hearing. For those who like to hear bats chittering overhead, if you’re willing to make a quiet world for yourself, you can enjoy them for decades more.

  18. #18 Allen Hazen
    March 26, 2011

    Heteromeles (#17)–
    Music amplification has much to answer for. A few years ago a neuroscientist who was doing some sort of long-term hearing research reported (to a class we were team-teaching) that one of her subjects, a university student, had shown a marked drop in sensitivity from one week to the next: marked enough that the researchers asked him if he had done anything that might have affected his hearing. He had: he had gone to a rock concert over the weekend. The damage was apparently permanent: his hearing sensistivity had not recovered a year later.

  19. #19 TheGourmetCoffeeGuy
    March 27, 2011

    What a fascinating post, extremely informative and providing great insights into the important role bats play in nature. Very educational. Thank you for sharing your expertise.

  20. #20 James Robins
    March 27, 2011

    Peripheral question, apart from enlarged auditory bullae, is there any indication on the skull of the possession of such huge ears? J

  21. #21 Darren Naish
    March 27, 2011

    So far as I can tell, proportionally large auditory bullae provide the only skeletal indication of enormous ears. A correlation between the two has been used on fossils, since the enormous bullae of the tiny borophagine canid Otarocyon cooki have been used to infer giant, fennec-like ears. However, while enlarged bullae are consistent with giant pinnae, they don’t necessarily demonstrate them: gundis have huge bullae (and hence huge middle ears) but their pinnae are short.

  22. #22 Tim Morris
    March 28, 2011

    David: It’s not so much that part of the call, more of a high-pitched, recurring “peep-peep-peep” or “pip-pip-pip”.

  23. #23 David Marjanović
    March 29, 2011

    David: It’s not so much that part of the call, more of a high-pitched, recurring “peep-peep-peep” or “pip-pip-pip”.

    Interesting. I’ll try to pay attention to this next time I encounter bats — maybe in July…

    Of course, call frequencies differ between species.

  24. #24 Tim Morris
    March 31, 2011

    Dave: I personally think I’m hearing more of the bat call than is usually typical. I know the sound you’re talking about, but what I hear is definitely more like the squeaking, chirping part of the call. I think I may be able to hear some higher noises than at least some older people, because my parents never hear the noise. Also, once, I heard one of those “silent” ringtones that are supposed to be so high as to be inaudible to older folk.

The site is currently under maintenance and will be back shortly. New comments have been disabled during this time, please check back soon.