Now on ScienceBlogs: The Galaxy's Biggest Valentine

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Thoughts from Kansas

You will notice that it lacks definiteness; that it lacks purpose; that it lacks coherence; that it lacks a subject to talk about; that it is loose and wabbly; that it wanders around; that it loses itself early and does not find itself any more. --Mark Twain

Search

Profile

Josh at work Joshua Rosenau spends his days defending the teaching of evolution at the National Center for Science Education. He is formerly a doctoral candidate at the University of Kansas, in the department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. When not battling creationists or modeling species ranges, he writes about developments in progressive politics and the sciences.

The opinions expressed here are his own, do not reflect the official position of the NCSE. Indeed, older posts may no longer reflect his own official position.

Sb/DonorsChoose Drive


Thanks!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Subscribe to TfK:

Accolades

Best of Kansas City

Good posts from history

The Birth of Intelligent Falling

A failure of Intelligent Design

Why it's called Intelligent Design Creationism

Write a letter to the editor

My photo albums.

Support TfK

Buy me things from my Amazon.com wishlist.

Buy yourself things!

Search Now:
Search Amazon.com
Add yourself to the Frappr map!
Check out our Frappr or add yourself to it!

    follow me on Twitter

    « Working hard to be less popular | Main | Don't expect to see much of Jim Ryun »

    Kansans back embryonic stem cell research

    Category: Policy and Politics
    Posted on: November 13, 2006 11:28 AM, by Josh Rosenau

    SurveyUSA polled 500 Kansans on behalf of KWCH. Asked "Based on what you know today, do you support or oppose embryonic stem cell research?" the research had 60% support, 32% opposition.

    The poll follows suggestions that Kansas pass an amendment like the MIssouri stem cell amendment. The Wichita Eagle's blog points out that such an amendment isn't going to move because it requires 2/3 support in the legislature, which it won't get.

    What's interesting is that these poll results are lower than a poll a year ago commissioned by the Kansas Coalition for Lifesaving Cures. That poll asked a wider range of questions, and provided the respondents more information about the research. I suspect that the same set of questions would show Kansas more supportive of stem cell research now.

    For instance, the KCLC poll started with an explanation:

    As you may know, stem cells are special cells that have the potential to cure diseases and injuries by repairing damaged cells in a patient's body. One type, called adult type stem cells, is found in body tissues, such as bone marrow, and discarded umbilical cords and placentas. Another type, called embryonic stem cells, can be produced by a process called S-C-N-T, which uses a patient’s own cell and an unfertilized human egg to make stem cells. Embryonic stem cells can also be obtained from leftover fertility clinic embryos that would otherwise be discarded.
    They got 65% approval with this question:
    Q4. Do you approve or disapprove of obtaining embryonic stem cells for medical research and potential cures from leftover fertility clinic embryos that would otherwise be discarded?
    and 68% support for this:
    Do you approve or disapprove of obtaining embryonic stem cells for medical research and potential cures using the process called S-C-N-T, which uses a patient’s own cell and an unfertilized human egg to make stem cells?
    When you see significant shifts in opinion depending on how much information you give, it suggests that people are making up their mind when you call them, that there's an opportunity to inform the public.

    Interestingly, the major opponents to this research in SUSA's poll were between 35 and 55, younger and older respondents had support levels of 63% and 69% respectively. African Americans were also less likely to support stem cell research, which is not surprising.

    SUSA didn't break this down by party or ideology, but there's no way you get to 60% support without splitting the Republican vote. Typically, moderate Republican and Independent voters align with Democrats on stem cells.

    Share on Facebook
    Share on StumbleUpon
    Share on Facebook

    TrackBacks

    TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/25744

    Post a Comment

    (Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





    ScienceBlogs

    Search ScienceBlogs:

    Go to:

    Advertisement
    Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

    © 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.