Now on ScienceBlogs: Charles Darwin February 12, 1809 - April 19, 1882

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Thoughts from Kansas

You will notice that it lacks definiteness; that it lacks purpose; that it lacks coherence; that it lacks a subject to talk about; that it is loose and wabbly; that it wanders around; that it loses itself early and does not find itself any more. --Mark Twain

Search

Profile

Josh at work Joshua Rosenau spends his days defending the teaching of evolution at the National Center for Science Education. He is formerly a doctoral candidate at the University of Kansas, in the department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. When not battling creationists or modeling species ranges, he writes about developments in progressive politics and the sciences.

The opinions expressed here are his own, do not reflect the official position of the NCSE. Indeed, older posts may no longer reflect his own official position.

Sb/DonorsChoose Drive


Thanks!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Subscribe to TfK:

Accolades

Best of Kansas City

Good posts from history

The Birth of Intelligent Falling

A failure of Intelligent Design

Why it's called Intelligent Design Creationism

Write a letter to the editor

My photo albums.

Support TfK

Buy me things from my Amazon.com wishlist.

Buy yourself things!

Search Now:
Search Amazon.com
Add yourself to the Frappr map!
Check out our Frappr or add yourself to it!

    follow me on Twitter

    « Unpopular Senators | Main | Science education disparities »

    Simple answers to simple questions

    Category: Culture Wars
    Posted on: November 16, 2006 10:25 AM, by Josh Rosenau

    Pim van Meurs asks:

    Is there anything redeeming to Intelligent Design?
    No.

    This has been another edition of simple answers to simple questions.

    Share on Facebook
    Share on StumbleUpon
    Share on Facebook

    TrackBacks

    TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/25971

    Comments

    1

    ...well, unless you're talking in the context of engineering, in which case I'd hope that intelligent design is the norm. (But that kind of id doesn't have capitalizations.)

    -Rob

    Posted by: Rob Knop | November 16, 2006 12:57 PM

    2

    ID proponents can always serve as poster children for birth control.

    Posted by: TRACY | November 16, 2006 2:55 PM

    3

    Frankly, Josh,

    I think you spent way too much time, and words, answering the question.

    Posted by: MonkeyHawk | November 16, 2006 3:36 PM

    Post a Comment

    (Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





    ScienceBlogs

    Search ScienceBlogs:

    Go to:

    Advertisement
    Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

    © 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.