Now on ScienceBlogs: Charles Darwin February 12, 1809 - April 19, 1882

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Thoughts from Kansas

You will notice that it lacks definiteness; that it lacks purpose; that it lacks coherence; that it lacks a subject to talk about; that it is loose and wabbly; that it wanders around; that it loses itself early and does not find itself any more. --Mark Twain

Search

Profile

Josh at work Joshua Rosenau spends his days defending the teaching of evolution at the National Center for Science Education. He is formerly a doctoral candidate at the University of Kansas, in the department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. When not battling creationists or modeling species ranges, he writes about developments in progressive politics and the sciences.

The opinions expressed here are his own, do not reflect the official position of the NCSE. Indeed, older posts may no longer reflect his own official position.

Sb/DonorsChoose Drive


Thanks!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Subscribe to TfK:

Accolades

Best of Kansas City

Good posts from history

The Birth of Intelligent Falling

A failure of Intelligent Design

Why it's called Intelligent Design Creationism

Write a letter to the editor

My photo albums.

Support TfK

Buy me things from my Amazon.com wishlist.

Buy yourself things!

Search Now:
Search Amazon.com
Add yourself to the Frappr map!
Check out our Frappr or add yourself to it!

    follow me on Twitter

    « Carbon Tax | Main | Arrogant ignorance »

    Climate looniness

    Category: Planet Earth
    Posted on: February 9, 2007 11:17 AM, by Josh Rosenau

    The House Science Committee held a historic hearing on the IPCC report and the status of climate change (link to RealPlayer video of the hearing). It was especially historic because Speaker Pelosi made it the first committee she testified before as Speaker. She expressed her concerns about climate change, and the concerns she's heard from many others.

    The hearing continued for over three hours, with a panel of experts occupying most of the time. The panel consisted of climate scientists who had contributed and edited portions of the IPCC report and the Summary for Policy Makers recently released. Chris Mooney covered the hearing for Seed magazine.

    But what I want to talk about is not the excellent testimony offered, but the concluding remarks by Rep. Dana Rohrabacher. He had aggressively questioned on witness, pushing a fairly irrelevant question about what fraction of carbon dioxide in the air comes from natural sources, then ignoring the answers he got. In his concluding remarks, he observed that carbon dioxide levels have fluctuated throughout the Earth's history.

    "We don't know what those other cycles were caused by in the past," Representative Rohrabacher speculated, "it could be dinosaur flatulence."

    No one laughed. Rohrabacher was unable to bring any witnesses who could defend that claim, or indeed any climate change deniers at all.

    Share on Facebook
    Share on StumbleUpon
    Share on Facebook

    TrackBacks

    TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/32907

    Comments

    1

    If only someone had the gonads to say "The only flatulance around here is coming from you lips, Dana". I would say it, but of course that is why I am proabably not electable..

    Posted by: J-Dog | February 9, 2007 12:25 PM

    2
    Rohrabacher was unable to bring any witnesses who could defend that claim, or indeed any climate change deniers at all.

    Does this mean "Rohrabacher was not allowed to bring climate change deniers as witnesses" or "Rohrabacher did not bother attempting to call any climate change deniers as witnesses"?

    Posted by: Coin | February 9, 2007 2:04 PM

    3

    He had the opportunity, but either couldn't get his crap together, or didn't want to.

    Apparently he thought about inviting someone from the Chamber of Commerce, but realized it would look silly seating a businessman next to several climate scientists.

    Posted by: Josh | February 9, 2007 4:51 PM

    4

    Apparently he doesn't know the difference between carbon dioxide and methane, either. Dino farts, indeed.

    Posted by: Bob C | February 11, 2007 8:49 AM

    5

    So, can we say that redneck farts are the current cause of global climate change?

    Posted by: Sally Tarasoff | February 12, 2007 11:44 PM

    6

    Looks like Rohrabacher might have been correct in his comment about dinosaur gas becuase a scientist at this year's American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting has suggested just such a thing:
    newsminer.com/bookmark/10721028-Gaseous-dinosaurs-that-‘might-have-contributed’-to-global-warming

    And why isn't it funny when greens say cow flatulence could be contributing to AGW?

    Posted by: kramer | December 19, 2010 6:43 AM

    Post a Comment

    (Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





    ScienceBlogs

    Search ScienceBlogs:

    Go to:

    Advertisement
    Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

    © 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.