Now on ScienceBlogs: Oh, no! School wi-fi is making our kids sick! (2012 edition)

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Thoughts from Kansas

You will notice that it lacks definiteness; that it lacks purpose; that it lacks coherence; that it lacks a subject to talk about; that it is loose and wabbly; that it wanders around; that it loses itself early and does not find itself any more. --Mark Twain

Search

Profile

Josh at work Joshua Rosenau spends his days defending the teaching of evolution at the National Center for Science Education. He is formerly a doctoral candidate at the University of Kansas, in the department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. When not battling creationists or modeling species ranges, he writes about developments in progressive politics and the sciences.

The opinions expressed here are his own, do not reflect the official position of the NCSE. Indeed, older posts may no longer reflect his own official position.

Sb/DonorsChoose Drive


Thanks!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Subscribe to TfK:

Accolades

Best of Kansas City

Good posts from history

The Birth of Intelligent Falling

A failure of Intelligent Design

Why it's called Intelligent Design Creationism

Write a letter to the editor

My photo albums.

Support TfK

Buy me things from my Amazon.com wishlist.

Buy yourself things!

Search Now:
Search Amazon.com
Add yourself to the Frappr map!
Check out our Frappr or add yourself to it!

    follow me on Twitter

    « Newt Crossing | Main | Dick Cheney: Too busy to do his job »

    Kansas Coal Plants on hold

    Category: Policy and Politics
    Posted on: April 11, 2007 12:49 PM, by Josh Rosenau

    After a leveraged buyout of a Texas utility put it on a greener path, the unanimous agreement of world governments that global warming is already changing ecosystems and affecting business, and reports that a new Dust Bowl may be forming, opposition to the construction of a new coal-fired plant in western Kansas, the largest west of the Mississippi, is growing. Just months ago, the company building it (to supply Colorado's energy needs) insisted they were full-speed ahead, but now they tell a different story:

    The Colorado power company planning the construction of two coal-fired power plants in Finney County is backing away from its original timeline.

    Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association Inc. announced Thursday that it will delay construction of the second of two units it plans to build south of Holcomb. …

    After re-evaluating its 44-member cooperatives' short-term power needs, Tri-State has decided to pursue additional natural gas and renewable energy plants,

    That decision also followed a decision by the Sierra Club to file suit and block the new plant.

    Natural gas isn't an ideal choice, but it produces less carbon dioxide for the same amount of energy. It will probably also be easier to put wind farms in western Kansas than in eastern Kansas. Since population density is so low, there are fewer people whose sightlines will be affected. Kansas could feed more energy into the grid than the state uses, selling the excess and letting polluting plants sit idle for longer. That would benefit everyone.

    Share on Facebook
    Share on StumbleUpon
    Share on Facebook

    TrackBacks

    TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/37893

    Comments

    1

    This is good news, especially now that the insurance industry is awake to the effects of global warming. Has anyone mentioned conservation measures as an "alternative"?

    We are getting a huge wind farm project here in McLean county, Illinois, and local opposition ranges from acidic to radioactive. Misinformation is flying everywhere and and locals have been informed it will destroy their quality of life.

    Posted by: decrepitoldfool | April 11, 2007 6:17 PM

    Post a Comment

    (Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





    ScienceBlogs

    Search ScienceBlogs:

    Go to:

    Advertisement
    Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

    © 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.