Now on ScienceBlogs: Oh, no! School wi-fi is making our kids sick! (2012 edition)

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Thoughts from Kansas

You will notice that it lacks definiteness; that it lacks purpose; that it lacks coherence; that it lacks a subject to talk about; that it is loose and wabbly; that it wanders around; that it loses itself early and does not find itself any more. --Mark Twain

Search

Profile

Josh at work Joshua Rosenau spends his days defending the teaching of evolution at the National Center for Science Education. He is formerly a doctoral candidate at the University of Kansas, in the department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. When not battling creationists or modeling species ranges, he writes about developments in progressive politics and the sciences.

The opinions expressed here are his own, do not reflect the official position of the NCSE. Indeed, older posts may no longer reflect his own official position.

Sb/DonorsChoose Drive


Thanks!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Subscribe to TfK:

Accolades

Best of Kansas City

Good posts from history

The Birth of Intelligent Falling

A failure of Intelligent Design

Why it's called Intelligent Design Creationism

Write a letter to the editor

My photo albums.

Support TfK

Buy me things from my Amazon.com wishlist.

Buy yourself things!

Search Now:
Search Amazon.com
Add yourself to the Frappr map!
Check out our Frappr or add yourself to it!

    follow me on Twitter

    « Back the Lawrence Domestic Partner registry | Main | Obvious to a practitioner »

    Identical by descent: catching cheaters at work

    Category: Culture Wars
    Posted on: May 1, 2007 12:57 PM, by Josh Rosenau

    ThinkProgress reports that a pump bid for New Orleans may have been rigged:

    When the Army Corps of Engineers solicited bids for drainage pumps for New Orleans, "it copied the specifications — typos and all — from the catalog of the manufacturer that ultimately won the $32 million contract."
    The coexistence of these typos is strong evidence that the Corps of Engineers specifications were copied verbatim. In other words, like novel forms of genes spreading through a family tree, those specifications were identical by descent. Identifying such novelties is how we identify common descent not just in biology, but in copyright law.

    In a high school production of Anything Goes by Cole Porter, the scripts regularly misspelled "fiancé" as "finance." At first, we assumed this was simply a result of poor proofreading, but after a while we wondered if it and other less Freudian typos might not have been introduced intentionally to catch people illegally reproducing the scripts. A perfect text would be much harder to prove that other people copied, while those typos would be strong evidence of a common ancestor.

    It's worth noting that a more error-prone text is less complex and less specified than a perfect one. How did we infer design?

    Share on Facebook
    Share on StumbleUpon
    Share on Facebook

    TrackBacks

    TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/39526

    Comments

    1

    I believe commercial map-makers, concerned with the possibility that someone might steal their Precious, often intentionally insert errors (roads that don't exist, etc) into their maps for precisely this reason - if they find someone else's map has the same error, that's good evidence that someone copied it.

    Posted by: SMC | May 2, 2007 1:17 AM

    2

    Exactily what I was about to post, SMC.

    But on a different topic... What?! Are you telling me there graft and corruption in New Orleans?!???

    Posted by: emawkc | May 2, 2007 10:12 AM

    3

    I've seen that about maps also. Emaw, I agree with your shock, except I think you meant to ask "Are you telling me there's waste and graft in military contracts?!???"

    Posted by: Josh Rosenau | May 2, 2007 12:24 PM

    Post a Comment

    (Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





    ScienceBlogs

    Search ScienceBlogs:

    Go to:

    Advertisement
    Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

    © 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.