Seed Media Group

Thoughts from Kansas

You will notice that it lacks definiteness; that it lacks purpose; that it lacks coherence; that it lacks a subject to talk about; that it is loose and wabbly; that it wanders around; that it loses itself early and does not find itself any more. --Mark Twain

Search this blog

Profile

Josh at work Joshua Rosenau spends his days defending the teaching of evolution at the National Center for Science Education. He is also a graduate student at the University of Kansas, completing a doctorate in the department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. When not modeling species distributions or battling creationists, he writes about developments in progressive politics and the sciences.

The opinions expressed here are his own, do not reflect the official position of the NCSE. Indeed, older posts may no longer reflect his own official position.

Sb/DonorsChoose Drive


Thanks!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Subscribe to TfK:

Accolades

Best of Kansas City

Good posts from history

The Birth of Intelligent Falling

A failure of Intelligent Design

Why it's called Intelligent Design Creationism

Write a letter to the editor

My photo albums.

Support TfK

Affiliate programs: buy through the links, and TfK will get a percentage.

Buying some music for your friends?

Apple iTunes

Or maybe some gift certificates?

Buy me things from my Amazon.com wishlist.

Buy yourself things!

Search Now:
Search Amazon.com

Good government

Find your state legislators

Help elect sensible leaders

Re-Elect Nancy Boyda!

Internet neighbors

Add yourself to the Frappr map!
Check out our Frappr or add yourself to it!

Blogroll

Progressive Blogroll Alliance

Show PBA Blogroll

Register here to join the PBA.

« Bonus random ten | Main | A right to email privacy »

Senate passes energy bill

Category: Policy and Politics
Posted on: June 22, 2007 1:17 PM, by Josh Rosenau

The Senate sent an energy bill to the House which includes strong fuel economy standards but doesn't include provisions that would have promoted renewable fuel use. Detroit had hoped for weaker fuel economy standards, and environmental groups had hoped to see a requirement that electric utilities generate at least 15% of their power from renewable fuels. The groups also lost a battle to boost taxes on oil companies and use the proceeds to subsidize production of renewable power from wind, solar energy and biomass.

Environmental groups scored a victory earlier in the debate when the Senate rejected a proposal to fund conversion of coal to liquid (CTL) fuel. The vote was a response to pressure from environmental groups and a report from the National Academies of Science that suggested there may be less coal than previously thought. CTL is estimated to increase greenhouse gas emissions by nearly 120%. Senator Obama, responding to this same evidence, dropped coal-to-liquid from his Presidential energy plan on Tuesday.

An amendment which would have required electric utilities to provide 15% of their electricity from renewable sources was filibustered, as was the proposal to tax oil companies to fund renewable power generation. Nebraska's Senator Grassley fought for the proposed tax, telling his colleagues "We’re taxing the oil industry to get a renewable energy industry started. I hope you’ll understand that God only made so much fossil fuel and that there’s got to be a follow-on if we’re going to have growth in our economy." The proposals had support from more than 50 Democrats and Republicans, but lacked the 60 votes to end debate.

Meanwhile, unsustainable coal plants remain the staple of new electrical generation. MidAmerican Energy Holdings' CEO David Sokol told the Washington Post "A lot of congressmen ask me, 'Dave, why are you building that coal plant?' And I say, 'What are my options?'" The proposed funding for renewable energy would have helped provide those alternatives.

The House will have an opportunity to take up some of the same issues when it considers the bill. The House's rules make it more likely that stronger measures will pass there, allowing a conference committee to sort out the details.

While Congress backed away from sweeping energy reform, New Jersey passed the stiffest carbon emissions law in the nation. The rules would restrict emissions from all sources, not just electrical plants, to cut emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, a 17% drop in emissions over-all. The bill requires additional cuts by 2050. New Jersey will also monitor emissions from plants out of state which sell electricity to the Garden State. The details of how those reductions will be achieved were left to state agencies.

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Readers' Picks

Search All Blogs



GeoURL ecto powered