So what do you think of the snazzy new banner?
Thoughts from Kansas
You will notice that it lacks definiteness; that it lacks purpose; that it lacks coherence; that it lacks a subject to talk about; that it is loose and wabbly; that it wanders around; that it loses itself early and does not find itself any more. --Mark Twain
Search
Profile
Joshua Rosenau spends his days defending the teaching of evolution at the National Center for Science Education. He is also a graduate student at the University of Kansas, completing a doctorate in the department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. When not modeling species distributions or battling creationists, he writes about developments in progressive politics and the sciences.
The opinions expressed here are his own, do not reflect the official position of the NCSE. Indeed, older posts may no longer reflect his own official position.
Sb/DonorsChoose Drive
Recent Posts
- There can only be one
- Todd Wood talks (some) sense
- Claude Levi-Strauss, R.I.P.
- On counting
- Christopher Hitchens doesn't like Mother Theresa
- Global warming, science denial, and how to teach more evolution
- Steve Fuller desecrates Norman Levitt's memory
- On false equivalences
- Happy Birthday!
- Cothran's continuing cavalcade of racists
Recent Comments
- pough on Todd Wood talks (some) sense
- dave souza on Todd Wood talks (some) sense
- Glen Davidson on There can only be one
- SLC on Todd Wood talks (some) sense
- Steve on Todd Wood talks (some) sense
- Jeremy Mohn on There can only be one
- SLC on Todd Wood talks (some) sense
- Tulse on Todd Wood talks (some) sense
- Steve on Todd Wood talks (some) sense
- Nathan Perkins on A brief note on analogies
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- August 2004
Accolades
Good posts from history
The Birth of Intelligent Falling
A failure of Intelligent Design
Why it's called Intelligent Design Creationism
Support TfK
Affiliate programs: buy through the links, and TfK will get a percentage.Buying some music for your friends?
Or maybe some gift certificates?
Buy me things from my Amazon.com wishlist.
Buy yourself things!
Good government
Internet neighbors
Add yourself to the Frappr map!
Blogroll
« Botflies | Main | Skin deep »
Banner
Category: Chatter
Posted on: July 20, 2007 8:07 AM, by Josh Rosenau
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/46124







Comments
Seems a bit busy. If the the thought bubble was not translucent that would help. Make the back drop design translucent a and the bubble more solid and I think it would be good to go. The back drop is taking attention away from the foreground. Otherwise, good job.
Posted by: SmedRock | July 20, 2007 8:51 AM
*Love* the cow/mouse/wombat thing peeking in from the corner...
Posted by: Ginny | July 20, 2007 9:20 AM
Looks sharp, I'd lose the opacity on the bubble though
Posted by: btr | July 20, 2007 9:26 AM
Tree kangaroo.
I agree that it's too busy. I wanted to work in the Twain quotation, but that just adds to the busyness.
Posted by: Josh Rosenau | July 20, 2007 9:26 AM
Too busy.
Greenish background with blue type is hard to read (and may be unreadable for folks with color blindness)
Ditto for the map at left.
hope this helps!
Posted by: Albatrossity | July 20, 2007 11:25 AM
I hadn't thought about the color blindness issue. Red-green colorblind people will still be able to read the map, but blue-yellow color blindness could make other things tricky.
Posted by: Josh Rosenau | July 20, 2007 12:02 PM
I like, on the whole. But that thought-balloon: the way it's rendered now, it looks more to me like a gust of wind emanating from Douglas County. "Hot air," in other words.
Are you able to render the emanating part with gradually-larger circles, as thought-balloons usually get rendered?
Posted by: John B. | July 20, 2007 12:12 PM
The satellite photo of the irrigation circles is my current desktop image.
Posted by: Adam | July 20, 2007 4:07 PM
Two big reasons it looks busy are the irrigation circles (well, that's what it looks like to me) background, which you should replace with something bland and boring, and the glaring red pixels of the Kansas state, which you should replace with state filled with (again) something bland and boring. The viewer's interest would be better drawn to (a) the quote and (b) the relationship between the various elements, rather than any individual element. Finally I suggest you reduce the transparency of the thought bubble, possibly to zero.
Posted by: llewelly | July 21, 2007 7:14 PM
By popular demand, I've reduced the opacity on the bubble, turned it into a thought bubble rather than a hybrid thought/speech bubble, and tweaked the colors to (hopefully) improve readability. I left the county blue/red map, but pushed some of the state out of sight, reducing the clutter without undermining the message. That also freed up space to make the quotation a little bigger, which makes it more legible and less busy.
Anything else?
Posted by: Josh Rosenau | July 22, 2007 2:06 AM
I'm from Iowa. Looks okay to me.
Posted by: Dirkh | July 22, 2007 1:25 PM