Now on ScienceBlogs: Oh, no! School wi-fi is making our kids sick! (2012 edition)

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Thoughts from Kansas

You will notice that it lacks definiteness; that it lacks purpose; that it lacks coherence; that it lacks a subject to talk about; that it is loose and wabbly; that it wanders around; that it loses itself early and does not find itself any more. --Mark Twain

Search

Profile

Josh at work Joshua Rosenau spends his days defending the teaching of evolution at the National Center for Science Education. He is formerly a doctoral candidate at the University of Kansas, in the department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. When not battling creationists or modeling species ranges, he writes about developments in progressive politics and the sciences.

The opinions expressed here are his own, do not reflect the official position of the NCSE. Indeed, older posts may no longer reflect his own official position.

Sb/DonorsChoose Drive


Thanks!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Subscribe to TfK:

Accolades

Best of Kansas City

Good posts from history

The Birth of Intelligent Falling

A failure of Intelligent Design

Why it's called Intelligent Design Creationism

Write a letter to the editor

My photo albums.

Support TfK

Buy me things from my Amazon.com wishlist.

Buy yourself things!

Search Now:
Search Amazon.com
Add yourself to the Frappr map!
Check out our Frappr or add yourself to it!

    follow me on Twitter

    « Phill "Pantysniffer" Kline uses taxpayer-funded website to continue election feud | Main | Baby rhino born at Sedgwick County (Wichita) Zoo »

    More on political interference with science

    Category: Policy and Politics
    Posted on: July 11, 2007 2:39 PM, by Josh Rosenau

    In my reaction to Bora's interview with Senator Edwards, I focussed on the importance of institutional safeguards for government scientists and presidential science advisors. In particular, I cited the way that President Bush misrepresents the scientific support for his stem cell policies from scientists in his administration and in the community of scientists at large.

    Yesterday's testimony by former surgeon general Carmona emphasizes the importance of establishing institutional safeguards for government science advisors. The LA Times explains that Carmona told the House Government Reform and Oversight Committee "that his speeches were censored to match administration political positions and that he was prevented from giving the public accurate scientific information on issues such as stem cell research and teen pregnancy prevention." Carmona said that previous surgeons general told him they had faced political interference, but never at the levels he described.

    "Anything that doesn't fit into the political appointees' ideological, theological or political agenda is ignored, marginalized or simply buried," Carmona explained. When he wanted to speak out in favor of expanded embryonic stem cell research, he was told to "stand down" because the administration made a policy judgment before hearing his views of the available evidence. The administration deleted references to stem cells from public statements he submitted for review. The discussion of stem cell policy within the government was, he testified, "devoid of science."

    The White House trotted out rhetoric which might seem similar on its face to Edwards's pledge to "ensure that government professionals charged with the collection and analysis of scientific data…are insulated from political influence." White House spokesman Tony Fratto told the Times "Dr. Carmona was given the authority and had the obligation to be the leading voice for the health of all Americans. It's disappointing to us if he failed to use his position to the fullest extent in advocating for policies he thought were in the best interests of the nation. We believe Dr. Carmona received the support necessary to carry out his mission." In other words, the Bush Administration thinks it's Carmona's fault that his voice wasn't heard, even though they were the ones censoring his words and controlling his access to decisionmakers and the terms of internal debate about biomedical research policy.

    Carmona told Congress that "the reality is that the nation's doctor has been marginalized and relegated to a position with no independent budget, and with supervisors who are political appointees with partisan agendas." It is precisely that sort of bureaucratic interference that is hardest to root out, but which can most effectively block a President from getting the best scientific advice possible. The Surgeon General answers to an assistant secretary in the Department of Health and Human Services. Unlike Bush I and Clinton, the current administration has not granted the national science advisor status as "assistant to the President," status which allows more frequent access to the President. Bush chose to isolate himself from scientific counsel, and allowed the nomination for his science advisor to languish in the Senate until after he had made decisions about stem cell policy and other key issues.

    One such issue was the push for abstinence-only sex education. Carmona testified that he supported comprehensive approaches to sex ed, including providing information about condoms to sexually active teens. The administration, he testified "did not want to hear the science … but wanted to preach abstinence, which I felt was scientifically incorrect."

    The nominee to succeed Carmona will undoubtedly offer less resistance to the administration. The gay-bashing cardiologist already sacrificed his scientific integrity in writing an anti-gay position paper for the United Methodist Church, adopting positions rejected by the scientific evidence. To bolster his fore-ordained conclusion, Dr. James Holsinger was glad to draw on the claims advanced by groups listed as hate groups by the Southern Poverty Law Center.

    Share on Facebook
    Share on StumbleUpon
    Share on Facebook

    TrackBacks

    TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/45351

    Comments

    1

    Your statement, Carmona told Congress that "the reality is that the nation's doctor has been marginalized and relegated to a position with no independent budget, and with supervisors who are political appointees with partisan agendas." harkens back to Soviet Russia. I am continually amazed at how many people still fail to see the extreme irony here. Thank you for being one of the few who isn't unaware.

    Posted by: Yar | July 11, 2007 4:33 PM

    Post a Comment

    (Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





    ScienceBlogs

    Search ScienceBlogs:

    Go to:

    Advertisement
    Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

    © 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.