Now on ScienceBlogs: Oh, no! School wi-fi is making our kids sick! (2012 edition)

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Thoughts from Kansas

You will notice that it lacks definiteness; that it lacks purpose; that it lacks coherence; that it lacks a subject to talk about; that it is loose and wabbly; that it wanders around; that it loses itself early and does not find itself any more. --Mark Twain

Search

Profile

Josh at work Joshua Rosenau spends his days defending the teaching of evolution at the National Center for Science Education. He is formerly a doctoral candidate at the University of Kansas, in the department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. When not battling creationists or modeling species ranges, he writes about developments in progressive politics and the sciences.

The opinions expressed here are his own, do not reflect the official position of the NCSE. Indeed, older posts may no longer reflect his own official position.

Sb/DonorsChoose Drive


Thanks!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Subscribe to TfK:

Accolades

Best of Kansas City

Good posts from history

The Birth of Intelligent Falling

A failure of Intelligent Design

Why it's called Intelligent Design Creationism

Write a letter to the editor

My photo albums.

Support TfK

Buy me things from my Amazon.com wishlist.

Buy yourself things!

Search Now:
Search Amazon.com
Add yourself to the Frappr map!
Check out our Frappr or add yourself to it!

    follow me on Twitter

    « Changing of the Guard | Main | Vitter earmark spiked: Senator blames "hysterics" »

    Contact your congresscritter: Don't use taxes to fund creationists

    Category: CreationismCulture WarsPolicy and Politics
    Posted on: October 15, 2007 5:39 PM, by Josh Rosenau

    Last month, papers in Louisiana spotted an interesting earmark tacked onto the Senate version of the appropriations bill for the Departments of Labor, HHS, and Education. Senator David Vitter (R-LA brothels) had allocated $100,000 for a Dobson-derived groupLousiana Family Forum. The money was meant to let them "promote better science education."

    Who could oppose better science education? It all depends on what, exactly, you mean by "better" and "science." LFF has a long history of pushing creationism in public schools, including drafting a controversial policy in the Ouachita school district which is widely regarded as a stalking-horse for the creationist "teach the controversy" strategy.

    In addition to that circuitous approach, they attack the teaching of evolution directly in an "addendum" to biology textbooks (PDF link). That addendum parrots standard creationist claims about the irreducibility of the flagellum, and cites Jonathan Woodmorappe (author of Noah's Ark: A Feasibility Study) in criticizing the geological column. Their account of the fossil record argues that "the fossilization process requires a violent burial. … When the billions of fossils that are everywhere are considered in this light, the earth's history had some very violent floods in its past." Or just one, I suppose. The pamphlet carries on with various oher discredited creationists arguments.

    There is no doubt how the LFF would spend $100,000 of taxpayer money. There is also no doubt that those uses would be unconstitutional, not to mention harmful to science education in Louisiana. Fortunately, there is a chance to put that money to a better use. The Senate is debating the appropriations bill this week, and senators will have a chance to pull that earmark. Given that the LFF claims not to have asked for the money, I'm sure they won't mind, and I imagine students and teachers everywhere could find better uses for $100,000.

    To tell your senators what you think of this earmark, call the Capitol Switchboard and ask them to patch you through: 202-224-3121. Senator Specter (R-PA), Senator Harkin (D-IA), Senator Byrd (D-WV) and Senator Cochran (R-MS) are managing the bill, and are therefore especially important to lobby; they are likely to be most responsive to constituents, so be sure to mention where you live when you call. Debate is scheduled to start tomorrow, and the bill may come to a vote as soon as next week. Now is the time to get involved.

    Share on Facebook
    Share on StumbleUpon
    Share on Facebook

    TrackBacks

    TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/53119

    Comments

    1

    I've always loved the term "congresscritter" :) An aquaintance of mine is the first time I saw it used, Mr. Lizard the global village grouch :) The term fits so well. I will definately give my representatives a call, even if my voice is small and unnoticeable.

    Posted by: Uafbum | October 17, 2007 5:53 PM

    2

    Long walk from C&L site...

    Bill Hicks jokes about fossils : "God put those there to test our faith"

    Once a joke, now the fundies are truly trying to publish crap like this. Wow. Thanks to Mr. Diapers we're enabling ignorance.


    Posted by: StirFry | October 19, 2007 11:12 AM

    Post a Comment

    (Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





    ScienceBlogs

    Search ScienceBlogs:

    Go to:

    Advertisement
    Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

    © 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.