Now on ScienceBlogs: Oldest Human-Made Object in Space

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Thoughts from Kansas

You will notice that it lacks definiteness; that it lacks purpose; that it lacks coherence; that it lacks a subject to talk about; that it is loose and wabbly; that it wanders around; that it loses itself early and does not find itself any more. --Mark Twain

Search

Profile

Josh at work Joshua Rosenau spends his days defending the teaching of evolution at the National Center for Science Education. He is formerly a doctoral candidate at the University of Kansas, in the department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. When not battling creationists or modeling species ranges, he writes about developments in progressive politics and the sciences.

The opinions expressed here are his own, do not reflect the official position of the NCSE. Indeed, older posts may no longer reflect his own official position.

Sb/DonorsChoose Drive


Thanks!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Subscribe to TfK:

Accolades

Best of Kansas City

Good posts from history

The Birth of Intelligent Falling

A failure of Intelligent Design

Why it's called Intelligent Design Creationism

Write a letter to the editor

My photo albums.

Support TfK

Buy me things from my Amazon.com wishlist.

Buy yourself things!

Search Now:
Search Amazon.com
Add yourself to the Frappr map!
Check out our Frappr or add yourself to it!

    follow me on Twitter

    « Disco's Rob Crowther can't read (or just doesn't want to) | Main | Hurray for Kismet »

    Judgment Day rocks

    Category: Culture Wars
    Posted on: November 14, 2007 4:33 AM, by Josh Rosenau

    You can see the NCSE's official stance on the NOVA documentary about the Dover trial at our website, but I want to add to that. The official stance is that it is "accurate," which skips the part about how ID got its ass handed to it in Dover. The thrill of that victory was getting a bit distant, and it's nice to remember just how badly ID (and the DI) blew it in their first big day out. The documentary does a nice job showing just how badly the IDolators screwed up, but they couldn't pack all of their stupidity into a mere two hour show.

    The re-enactments were nice, but the vaguely British actors were jarring. I've met most of the people being re-enacted, and I know that a lot was lost in translation. None of them are nearly so arch and aloof as their actors seemed. Kevin Padian is known for his off-color sense of humor, Barbara Forrest's light Southern drawl makes her systematic dissection of ID all the more devastating, and Kenneth Miller's calm, affable demeanor got lost in translation. Comparatively ancient primate Michael Behe is a bigger tool than he seemed like on camera, but it's a family show and there have to be limits.

    The highlights were:

    • cdesign proponentists: it never gets old, but where was the infamous chart?
    • Tree of Life: hard to get right, but they managed, and Padian did a great job explaining it
    • Neil Shubin and Tiktaalik: Shubin is really good
    • Fuller and "John loves Mary": Fuller makes a fool of himself wherever he goes
    • Behe/DeRosier point-counterpoint: "I'm Marshall McLuhan, and you know nothing of my work," and a great explanation of how the flagellum evolved
    • Bill Buckingham unloads on Judge Jones: Given that a perjury investigation is still open, not a smart move

    Things I wanted more of:

    • NCSErs: selfish reasons
    • Discoers: because it's nice to have their silliness on film
    • re-enactments of Jones: by the end of the trial, he lit into the lying witnesses, and I'd like to have seen that re-enacted
    Very cool seeing people I work with on NOVA. Even cooler seeing the awesome case presented in Dover on the TV. Judge Jones has repeatedly said that he regrets not having allowed cameras in the courtroom, and I can see why. Our expert witnesses (including several who weren't re-enacted, like Rob Pennock, Brian Alters, and John Haught) know this material, and have the rare ability to present the science of evolution and the history of creationism in ways that are compelling and fascinating. The ID side (expert witnesses and board members) made such buffoons of themselves that no reconstruction can capture it.

    Share on Facebook
    Share on StumbleUpon
    Share on Facebook

    TrackBacks

    TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/55592

    Comments

    1

    People who watched and appreciated it should provide positive feedback to the PBS producers. I'm sure they're going to get flamed by fundies and IDiots.

    Posted by: Ex-drone | November 14, 2007 5:16 AM

    2

    good point ex-drone. I sent them a nice note.

    Posted by: paul01 | November 14, 2007 7:25 AM

    3

    Time to buy 60 copies of the DVD and send them to Dover's High School library as a anonymous donation with a catalog on the bottom labeled science?

    Okay too much of a waste of money for a good joke. Maybe if everyone just bought one DVD for themselves or for the local library. It might encourage PBS to do more.

    Posted by: Some evolutionist | November 14, 2007 7:46 AM

    4

    I hadn't intended on watching it since I was already on the good side of the issue and I was tired from a long day. But I watched the first few minutes and was hooked. I am soooo glad PBS had the courage to air this and NOVA had the sense to compile it.

    Posted by: pablo | November 18, 2007 9:29 AM

    Post a Comment

    (Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





    ScienceBlogs

    Search ScienceBlogs:

    Go to:

    Advertisement
    Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

    © 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.