Now on ScienceBlogs: Oh, no! School wi-fi is making our kids sick! (2012 edition)

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Thoughts from Kansas

You will notice that it lacks definiteness; that it lacks purpose; that it lacks coherence; that it lacks a subject to talk about; that it is loose and wabbly; that it wanders around; that it loses itself early and does not find itself any more. --Mark Twain

Search

Profile

Josh at work Joshua Rosenau spends his days defending the teaching of evolution at the National Center for Science Education. He is formerly a doctoral candidate at the University of Kansas, in the department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. When not battling creationists or modeling species ranges, he writes about developments in progressive politics and the sciences.

The opinions expressed here are his own, do not reflect the official position of the NCSE. Indeed, older posts may no longer reflect his own official position.

Sb/DonorsChoose Drive


Thanks!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Subscribe to TfK:

Accolades

Best of Kansas City

Good posts from history

The Birth of Intelligent Falling

A failure of Intelligent Design

Why it's called Intelligent Design Creationism

Write a letter to the editor

My photo albums.

Support TfK

Buy me things from my Amazon.com wishlist.

Buy yourself things!

Search Now:
Search Amazon.com
Add yourself to the Frappr map!
Check out our Frappr or add yourself to it!

    follow me on Twitter

    « Attention Floridians | Main | Sadly, No! visits CPAC, sees Expelled, survives »

    Kansas does the right thing

    Category: Policy and Politics
    Posted on: February 9, 2008 9:41 PM, by Josh Rosenau

    On Super-Typhoon Tuesday, Kansans overwhelmingly supported Barack Obama for President. This was gratifying, but a muted victory given the overwhelming number of Kansans who aren't Democrats (yet).

    But today, in the Republican caucuses, the people spoke again. They rejected nutbar militarist John McCain, and overwhelmingly casting a protest vote for flab-busting Arkansan Mike Huckabee. In short, the state has now rejected the Republican nominee and voted for the (knock wood) Democratic nominee.

    Meanwhile, Washingtonians, Louisianans and Nebraskans all backed Barack Obama today. Hopefully Mainers will do the same tomorrow.

    If so, it will severely weaken the Clinton campaign, and probably cause some of her backers to start wheeling and dealing. Either way, the campaign will continue, on to Ohio, Texas, and, eventually, Florida. As they say, that rules. Both candidates now have well-established activist networks in many states, and by the convention, will have run a competitive campaign and GOTV in key swing states (and note that most of the swing states to vote thus far have preferred Obama to Hillary).

    Obama and Clinton are both stronger for having been forced to run a national campaign in the primary, since one of them will get to do the same thing in the fall, and then will have to run the country, which won't allow a lot of time for retail politics. Having a few early primaries, where a candidate could shake the hand of every eligible voter, was nice. Following that with a national primary was nice, and the continuing pace of the primaries will test these candidates' abilities in informative ways.

    We learned a lot about Obama and Hillary in the run-up to Feb. 5, about how they'd govern and how they'd run their general election campaigns (we probably learned about the Republican candidates, too, but I haven't been hanging on the minutiae of that race).

    Obama ran the sort of national campaign that many of us hoped to see Dean run a few years back. He took his experience organizing on Chicago's South Side, and put together a national community organizing campaign. And it worked. He nearly overcame the Clinton machines in Southern California using an army of thousands of volunteers and an open attitude toward new technology. He ran serious campaigns in states candidates usually ignore in the primaries and the general election. That tells us a lot about how Obama would govern, and it puts John McCain on notice that he'll have to defend himself in every state, not just a handful of swing states.

    Even in Kansas, a new day is coming, and we are the change we've been waiting for.

    Share on Facebook
    Share on StumbleUpon
    Share on Facebook

    TrackBacks

    TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/63678

    Comments

    1

    I sort of figured Kansas voted for Huckabee because they prefer to vote for the "Christian" candidate. I think that's why he won here in Alabama. Is it really because they just wanted to vote against McCain and make a statement? I haven't read any of the analysis about the GOP race there.

    I was pretty thrilled about the Dem. race results yesterday!

    Oh to your other reader, I have no idea who Yglasis is, so no, I don't comment on that blog. There are a couple hundred thousand women named Jennifer in this country, you know.

    Posted by: Jennifer | February 10, 2008 12:45 PM

    Post a Comment

    (Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





    ScienceBlogs

    Search ScienceBlogs:

    Go to:

    Advertisement
    Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

    © 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.