Now on ScienceBlogs: The Galaxy's Biggest Valentine

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Thoughts from Kansas

You will notice that it lacks definiteness; that it lacks purpose; that it lacks coherence; that it lacks a subject to talk about; that it is loose and wabbly; that it wanders around; that it loses itself early and does not find itself any more. --Mark Twain

Search

Profile

Josh at work Joshua Rosenau spends his days defending the teaching of evolution at the National Center for Science Education. He is formerly a doctoral candidate at the University of Kansas, in the department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. When not battling creationists or modeling species ranges, he writes about developments in progressive politics and the sciences.

The opinions expressed here are his own, do not reflect the official position of the NCSE. Indeed, older posts may no longer reflect his own official position.

Sb/DonorsChoose Drive


Thanks!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Subscribe to TfK:

Accolades

Best of Kansas City

Good posts from history

The Birth of Intelligent Falling

A failure of Intelligent Design

Why it's called Intelligent Design Creationism

Write a letter to the editor

My photo albums.

Support TfK

Buy me things from my Amazon.com wishlist.

Buy yourself things!

Search Now:
Search Amazon.com
Add yourself to the Frappr map!
Check out our Frappr or add yourself to it!

    follow me on Twitter

    « More on moral courage | Main | The other white meat »

    Nothing Ben Stein says should be trusted

    Category: Creationism
    Posted on: February 13, 2008 2:18 PM, by Josh Rosenau

    At the blog for Expelled: No Intelligence, featuring Ben Stein, the producers insist "We’ll take Lincoln Day over Darwin Day…any day." The whole thing is a pack of lies, ably dissected by PZ Myers. I couldn't get past the first sentence before giving up on the rest:

    Until the late 1980’s when the generic “President’s Day” became the official holiday that subsumed them, America used to celebrate the birthdays of both George Washington and Abraham Lincoln.
    This sentence is grammatically, historically and factually wrong, as is everything else written by the movie's producers or narrator.

    Lincoln's birthday was never an officially recognized holiday, so their use of the phrase "America used to celebrate" is either wrong or ambiguous. Strictly, the federal government doesn't recognize a holiday named "Presidents' Day" or "Presidents Day," let alone No Intelligence's "President's Day." As Wikipedia notes "President's Day is a misspelling when used with the intention of celebrating more than one individual." Next Monday, the feds will celebrate "Washington's Birthday."
    The law moving that celebration to the third Monday in February was signed into lawtook effect in 1971, during Richard Nixon's presidency. Ben Stein was, of course, a staffer in that administration, and didn't have to remain silent on the Lincoln snub for 37 years. He could have insisted that the day be known not as "Washington's Birthday," but as Lincoln's and Washington's Birthdays," or some such construction (though that wouldn't have gone over well with Nixon's race-baiting Southern Strategy). He didn't.

    Update: I misread the legislative history. Thanks to readers pough and Gemmell for catching the slip.

    Share on Facebook
    Share on StumbleUpon
    Share on Facebook

    TrackBacks

    TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/64045

    Comments

    1

    Well, as a fan of Big Science, and a long time Darwanista, I move that we change Feb 12 to Punch Ben Stein In The Face Day.

    I might be open for a compromise, ID IS A TOTAL LYING SCAM DAY.

    Posted by: J-Dog | February 13, 2008 2:50 PM

    2

    Looks like it was signed in '68 but took effect in '71. It's got Johnson's signature on it: http://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/2004/winter/images/uniform-monday-holiday-law.jpg

    Posted by: pough | February 13, 2008 3:28 PM

    3

    Just to confuse things further . . .

    And of course, on the day Washington was born, the calendar said February 11, not February 22.

    (I'll say no more to give others a chance to chime in on it. For those who don't know, and have access to a Unix box, try executing the command "cal 9 1752" for a hint.)

    Posted by: Ahcuah | February 13, 2008 4:11 PM

    4

    And he bitched about the stolen days for the rest of his life.

    Posted by: The Ridger | February 13, 2008 5:50 PM

    Post a Comment

    (Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





    ScienceBlogs

    Search ScienceBlogs:

    Go to:

    Advertisement
    Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

    © 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.