Now on ScienceBlogs: Oh, no! School wi-fi is making our kids sick! (2012 edition)

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Thoughts from Kansas

You will notice that it lacks definiteness; that it lacks purpose; that it lacks coherence; that it lacks a subject to talk about; that it is loose and wabbly; that it wanders around; that it loses itself early and does not find itself any more. --Mark Twain

Search

Profile

Josh at work Joshua Rosenau spends his days defending the teaching of evolution at the National Center for Science Education. He is formerly a doctoral candidate at the University of Kansas, in the department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. When not battling creationists or modeling species ranges, he writes about developments in progressive politics and the sciences.

The opinions expressed here are his own, do not reflect the official position of the NCSE. Indeed, older posts may no longer reflect his own official position.

Sb/DonorsChoose Drive


Thanks!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Subscribe to TfK:

Accolades

Best of Kansas City

Good posts from history

The Birth of Intelligent Falling

A failure of Intelligent Design

Why it's called Intelligent Design Creationism

Write a letter to the editor

My photo albums.

Support TfK

Buy me things from my Amazon.com wishlist.

Buy yourself things!

Search Now:
Search Amazon.com
Add yourself to the Frappr map!
Check out our Frappr or add yourself to it!

    follow me on Twitter

    « Nothing Ben Stein says should be trusted | Main | On parables »

    The other white meat

    Category: Creationism
    Posted on: February 14, 2008 3:06 PM, by Josh Rosenau

    Ken Ham squeals:

    It is so sad that millions of dollars are being spent on researching the universe, but the underlying philosophy is often that scientists want to find answers to how life arose, and in this case, “from where diseases come from.” They are “willingly ignorant” that the God of the universe has already given us the answers as to how life arose (Genesis 1:1) and also as to why there are diseases—because of sin.
    Ham seems to think that all that money is just pork-barrel spending, and that scientific budgets are larded with needless expenditures. Alas, his concept of science is rooted in a naive caricature of Bacon, and would would keep our society mired in the muck.

    Share on Facebook
    Share on StumbleUpon
    Share on Facebook

    TrackBacks

    TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/64148

    Comments

    1

    I wonder if Ham goes to the doctor when he is ill.

    Posted by: Ericb | February 14, 2008 3:24 PM

    2

    Ericb - No, he just talks to god, and god forgives him his sins, so then he is all better.

    Damn! Don't they teach kids anything these days at the Christian Schools?

    And sometimes The Lord sends his Holy People Private Jets, so they don't have to sit next to sinners in coach or even business class, so they don't get sick! It's a Friggin' Miracle(TM)!

    Posted by: J-Dog | February 14, 2008 3:29 PM

    3

    Eh? Given that bacteria get attacked by bacteria and viruses, where in Genesis does it say that microbes ever sinned? I checked -- bacteria are never mentioned, nor are viruses. Go ahead, check any biblical concordance for 'bacteriophage'.

    Whatever did honeybees do to deserve bee mites and hive fungus?

    Perhaps Ken Ham is one of those people we hear about who are functionally illiterate, so when he looks in the bible, he imagines things it could, and couldn't say. To him the printed page may look like random bug splatters. Who knows?

    Posted by: Ken Shabby | February 14, 2008 4:07 PM

    4

    "Willingly ignorant"?

    Pot, kettle, black.

    Oi, what in insufferable yob.

    Posted by: WTFWJD | February 14, 2008 4:09 PM

    5
    scientific budgets are larded with needless expenditures.

    They are not? (Irrespective of the Genesis/God whatever claims)

    Posted by: ravi | February 14, 2008 4:30 PM

    6

    scientific budgets are larded with needless expenditures.
    They are ...?

    I presume he considers any money, vestal virgins, slaves, and so on which are not going directly to him to be wasted or misappropriated. He probably also considers any meteorite and lightening strikes which do go in his direction to be wasted.

    Posted by: blf | February 15, 2008 1:30 AM

    7

    They want their wingnut welfare. The mirror of what they see scientists doing, "money fer nuttin".

    Posted by: Mold | February 17, 2008 12:58 AM

    8

    ......or you could just say thanks for receiving hard earned tax dollars to continue your research--without mouthing off.

    Posted by: Nellie | February 21, 2008 10:38 PM

    Post a Comment

    (Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





    ScienceBlogs

    Search ScienceBlogs:

    Go to:

    Advertisement
    Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

    © 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.