Seed Media Group

Thoughts from Kansas

You will notice that it lacks definiteness; that it lacks purpose; that it lacks coherence; that it lacks a subject to talk about; that it is loose and wabbly; that it wanders around; that it loses itself early and does not find itself any more. --Mark Twain

Search this blog

Profile

Josh at work Joshua Rosenau spends his days defending the teaching of evolution at the National Center for Science Education. He is also a graduate student at the University of Kansas, completing a doctorate in the department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. When not modeling species distributions or battling creationists, he writes about developments in progressive politics and the sciences.

The opinions expressed here are his own, do not reflect the official position of the NCSE. Indeed, older posts may no longer reflect his own official position.

Sb/DonorsChoose Drive


Thanks!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Subscribe to TfK:

Accolades

Best of Kansas City

Good posts from history

The Birth of Intelligent Falling

A failure of Intelligent Design

Why it's called Intelligent Design Creationism

Write a letter to the editor

My photo albums.

Support TfK

Affiliate programs: buy through the links, and TfK will get a percentage.

Buying some music for your friends?

Apple iTunes

Or maybe some gift certificates?

Buy me things from my Amazon.com wishlist.

Buy yourself things!

Search Now:
Search Amazon.com

Good government

Find your state legislators

Help elect sensible leaders

Re-Elect Nancy Boyda!

Internet neighbors

Add yourself to the Frappr map!
Check out our Frappr or add yourself to it!

Blogroll

Progressive Blogroll Alliance

Show PBA Blogroll

Register here to join the PBA.

« Off-message | Main | Intelligent design: "a grave theological error" »

Reject, denounce, deject or renounce?

Category: Policy and Politics
Posted on: March 12, 2008 12:22 AM, by Josh Rosenau

Geraldine Ferraro:

I really think they're attacking me because I'm white.
More precisely, they're attacking her because she told a Los Angeles paper:
If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position. And if he was a woman (of any color), he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept.
Yes, the marvelous life of black men in modern America. Truly, how could anyone think that dark skin in America could be a disadvantage.

One presumes that the Clinton campaign will shortly combine the prefixes "de-" and "re-" with bases "-ject" and "-nounce," as they demanded Obama do with the unsolicited support of a divisive public figure.

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments

#1

I like the comment of someone over at DailyKos: "Yes, if he were white, he wouldn't be in this position - he would have clinched the nomination by now."

Posted by: Kevin W. Parker | March 12, 2008 2:42 PM

#2

Would this be the same Geraldine Ferraro who said in 1988: "If Jesse Jackson were not black, he wouldn't be in the race"?

Posted by: John McKay | March 12, 2008 3:58 PM

#3

I've wondered since this came up if Hilary Clinton would be as far along in the primary process if she weren't the wife of a past president. Really, what qualifications does she have that make her unique other than the novelty of one relationship. (The same is probably true fro Dubya. Everyone knew he was an incompetent businessman, but he had the novelty of being the son of a president, and I think he road that a long way.)

Posted by: pablo | March 14, 2008 7:18 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Most German

Search All Blogs



GeoURL ecto powered