Seed Media Group

Thoughts from Kansas

You will notice that it lacks definiteness; that it lacks purpose; that it lacks coherence; that it lacks a subject to talk about; that it is loose and wabbly; that it wanders around; that it loses itself early and does not find itself any more. --Mark Twain

Search this blog

Profile

Josh at work Joshua Rosenau spends his days defending the teaching of evolution at the National Center for Science Education. He is also a graduate student at the University of Kansas, completing a doctorate in the department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. When not modeling species distributions or battling creationists, he writes about developments in progressive politics and the sciences.

The opinions expressed here are his own, do not reflect the official position of the NCSE. Indeed, older posts may no longer reflect his own official position.

Sb/DonorsChoose Drive


Thanks!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Subscribe to TfK:

Accolades

Best of Kansas City

Good posts from history

The Birth of Intelligent Falling

A failure of Intelligent Design

Why it's called Intelligent Design Creationism

Write a letter to the editor

My photo albums.

Support TfK

Affiliate programs: buy through the links, and TfK will get a percentage.

Buying some music for your friends?

Apple iTunes

Or maybe some gift certificates?

Buy me things from my Amazon.com wishlist.

Buy yourself things!

Search Now:
Search Amazon.com

Good government

Find your state legislators

Help elect sensible leaders

Re-Elect Nancy Boyda!

Internet neighbors

Add yourself to the Frappr map!
Check out our Frappr or add yourself to it!

Blogroll

Progressive Blogroll Alliance

Show PBA Blogroll

Register here to join the PBA.

« Happy Pi Day! | Main | Family Research Council: Stopping global warming will stop the Rapture »

Smithsonian picks a new boss

Category: AcademiaBiology
Posted on: March 17, 2008 4:20 PM, by Josh Rosenau

G. Wayne Clough, president of Georgia Tech, was tapped to run the Smithsonian Institution. As we've reported, he steps into a deeply troubled organization. His predecessor allowed infrastructure to crumble, appropriated museum artifacts for personal use in his offices, and focused more on cozying up to corporate sponsors than on the scientific and educational mission of the Smithsonian.

In many ways, Clough seems well-suited to restoring faith in the Smithsonian. He comes with an academic background, which means he will understand the needs of his staff, and appreciate the balance between the public face of museum exhibits and the important work that goes on behind the scenes. His background in civil engineering may even come in handy as the Smithsonian invests in building repairs, but I doubt that the infrastructure problems are that serious. The existing maintenance staff just need to be given the resources to do their jobs right.

Unfortunately, Clough has no background in running a museum, and I don't know how much scientific street cred (lab cred?) to give to his engineering background. Some engineers understand science, but engineers are also disproportionately likely to buy into creationism.

Bringing in someone with museum experience would have done a lot to strengthen the institution's core values, and would have been a signal to the scientific community and the public at large that the Smithsonian would be returning to its roots. Interim Smithsonian Secretary Cristián Samper had been in charge of the National Museum before taking over for Lawrence Small a year ago, and was seen as a possible permanent replacement. Peter Raven, of the Missouri Botanical Gardens, was often mentioned as a possible successor to Small as well.

The selection of Clough seems to be a step in the right direction, but recent experience suggests that it's worth remaining skeptical until he proves himself.

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments

#1

engineers are also disproportionately likely to buy into creationism.

Evidence, please?

I'm an engineer who is seriously annoyed by this claim. Yes, there are people who identify themselves as engineers who are cretins (and some of them very plausibly really are engineers), but that also applies to other scientific/evidence/rationality-based professions. E.g., surgeons.

Some data please? Evidence? Something to back this claim up? And disproportionate with respect to what? Priests? Little Green Men? Biologists? (They probably are disproportionate with respect to biologists, but if I had to guess, I'd guess that's the case for a noticeably large number of other professions.)

Posted by: blf | March 18, 2008 2:02 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Readers' Picks

Search All Blogs



GeoURL ecto powered