Seed Media Group

Thoughts from Kansas

You will notice that it lacks definiteness; that it lacks purpose; that it lacks coherence; that it lacks a subject to talk about; that it is loose and wabbly; that it wanders around; that it loses itself early and does not find itself any more. --Mark Twain

Search this blog

Profile

Josh at work Joshua Rosenau spends his days defending the teaching of evolution at the National Center for Science Education. He is also a graduate student at the University of Kansas, completing a doctorate in the department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. When not modeling species distributions or battling creationists, he writes about developments in progressive politics and the sciences.

The opinions expressed here are his own, do not reflect the official position of the NCSE. Indeed, older posts may no longer reflect his own official position.

Sb/DonorsChoose Drive


Thanks!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Subscribe to TfK:

Accolades

Best of Kansas City

Good posts from history

The Birth of Intelligent Falling

A failure of Intelligent Design

Why it's called Intelligent Design Creationism

Write a letter to the editor

My photo albums.

Support TfK

Affiliate programs: buy through the links, and TfK will get a percentage.

Buying some music for your friends?

Apple iTunes

Or maybe some gift certificates?

Buy me things from my Amazon.com wishlist.

Buy yourself things!

Search Now:
Search Amazon.com

Good government

Find your state legislators

Help elect sensible leaders

Re-Elect Nancy Boyda!

Internet neighbors

Add yourself to the Frappr map!
Check out our Frappr or add yourself to it!

Blogroll

Progressive Blogroll Alliance

Show PBA Blogroll

Register here to join the PBA.

« Want | Main | Busy, busy, busy »

Ken Miller: Expelled from Expelled for his religious views

Category: Culture Wars
Posted on: April 10, 2008 7:21 PM, by Josh Rosenau

The more that the producers of Expelled talk, the more they demonstrate their abject idiocy. Chris Heard transcribes part of producer Mark Mathis's discussion with Scientific American:

[SciAm editor] Mirsky: Why not also include comments from somebody like Ken Miller—

Mathis: Uh—

Mirsky: who is famously religious—

Mathis: well— [Laughs.]

Mirsky: and an evolutionary biologist.

Mathis: I would tell you this. And this is keeping in mind who you’re talking to is an associate producer. I don’t make decisions about who gets interviewed, and, and I don’t make decisions about if they’re interviewed, what makes it into the film.

[SciAm editor] Rennie: Mm-hmm, sure.

Mathis: But I would tell you from a, my personal standpoint as somebody who’s worked on this project, that Ken Miller would have confused the film unnecessarily. I don’t agree with Ken Miller. I think that you, I think that when you look at this issue and this debate, that really there’s, there’s one side of the line or the other, and you, it’s, it’s hard to stay, I don’t think you can intellectually, honestly, honestly intellectually stand on a line that I don’t think exists—

Rennie: I mean, I think, listen—

Mathis: so—

Rennie: there are, there are obviously plenty of people, I mean as you mentioned, P.Z. Myers, Dawkins himself, a lot of them would make exactly that same argument—

Mathis: Mm-hmm, yeah.

Rennie: that somebody like Ken Miller is wrong. But I mean, you say he would have, his presence would have “confused the film.” The point is what, it would actually had, I mean, it would have, it would have considerably undercut the major point that is made, that really that belief in, in evolution obliges you not to believe in God, and to—

Mathis: No, I don’t think so, because, uh, the form of Catholicism that Ken Miller accepts and practices is, is nowhere near the form of Catholicism that is followed by Catholics who are members of the Catholic church, who believe in Catholic doctrine. What he believes is certainly out of—

[There are a few seconds here that are garbled as several people speak at once.—RCH]

In short, they only interviewed atheist scientists because they think that theistic scientists who oppose creationism aren't really theists, perhaps reinventing the "no true Scotsman" fallacy. To dismiss theistic scientists who oppose ID creationism (including many members of the American Scientific Affiliation, a group of evangelical scientists) because they "confuse" things is either a demonstration of a very low threshold for confusion on the part of the producers, or the very low opinion they have of their audience. People can handle the idea that there are theistic opponents of (ID) creationism, and there could have been real value in exploring the reasons why theists would oppose treating theology as a scientific endeavor.

Instead, the producers are reduced now to belittling the religious belief of scientists, and hiding an important part of this social debate merely because they find it inconvenient.

(N.B.: Ken Miller has discussed his take on evolution and creationism with Catholic bishops, etc., and they agree that his view is entirely concordant with Catholic teaching. As Chris Heard notes: "Agreeing with two popes is hardly an aberrant in Catholicism.")

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments

#1

I've corresponded with Miller via email several times. I will say this, Catholicism in Rhode Island is something truly unique.

In essence they're cafeteria Catholics here. Of course Bishop Thomas J. Tobin regularly rails against homosexuality, infidelity, abortion, and the things he has to squawk about.

I was brought up Catholic, did twelve years of Catholic schools and am now an atheist.

I'd always had an inkling since eight years old that there wasn't any sky fairy watching over us.

The thing that did it for me is not only did the Catholic schools try to instill dogma, they taught critical thinking skills. Once you applied critical thinking to the dogma guess what happened. Uh huh.

If I ever have a kid, he or she is going to a Catholic school. I'll pay that $4K a year because I know that coming out the other end, with my guidance of course, I'll have another disbeliever in this world.


Posted by: Tony P | April 10, 2008 8:32 PM

#2
No, I don�t think so, because, uh, the form of Catholicism that Ken Miller accepts and practices is, is nowhere near the form of Catholicism that is followed by Catholics who are members of the Catholic church, who believe in Catholic doctrine.

Mathis is full of shit. Although lapsed, I was raised Catholic. I attended Catholic schools for for 9 out of my K-12 years. There is nothing in Catholic doctrine that precludes accepting evolution. Indeed, in high school (and, I note, this was in the late 1970s), the Catholic high school I attended taught evolution in biology class pretty well.

The biology teacher was a priest, by the way.

Posted by: Orac | April 10, 2008 10:03 PM

#3

The film's producers don't want any of the faithful viewing audience to know that (gasp!) there are faithful, devout Christians who do accept evolution as God's method of working in the world.

Just more evidence that this is a conflict between sects of Christianity, not between science and religion.

Posted by: Cheryl Shepherd-Adams | April 11, 2008 6:53 AM

#4

So, imagine this:

The "Star Trek" history of the galaxy turns out to be correct. A few billion years ago, aliens seeded our planet with the first bacteria. Then evolution continued unabated until the present, us, and all other modern species.

Wow, ID and evolution, side by side, and completely compatible!

Not that this is the history of the Earth (there's no evidence that we were seeded nor that aliens engineered our genetics at any point), but it makes one thing very clear: If ID was science, it would take place within the framework of established science, including evolution, and not set itself up in opposition.

Indeed, there's no reason to think there is any problem with evolution at all, nor any contradiction between evolution and the idea of a designer or designers, unless you ascribe to the same basic theological assumptions as the Creationists that you are absolutely in no way associated with, right?

Posted by: Jason Failes | April 11, 2008 9:24 AM

#5

The cafeteria lines for every religion are so long its a wonder anyone even gets to eat. But compared the prix fixe menus from the same religions will stuff you so full your head explodes. That is why I choose to do my cooking at home!

Posted by: DaPrez | April 11, 2008 11:29 AM

#6

Check out the recently launched website Expelled Exposed which discusses the many flaws in the movie "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed"

More information at PandasThumb

Posted by: PvM | April 15, 2008 1:59 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Readers' Picks

Search All Blogs

Top Science Stories

powered by SEED - seedmagazine.com


GeoURL ecto powered