Now on ScienceBlogs: Oh, no! School wi-fi is making our kids sick! (2012 edition)

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Thoughts from Kansas

You will notice that it lacks definiteness; that it lacks purpose; that it lacks coherence; that it lacks a subject to talk about; that it is loose and wabbly; that it wanders around; that it loses itself early and does not find itself any more. --Mark Twain

Search

Profile

Josh at work Joshua Rosenau spends his days defending the teaching of evolution at the National Center for Science Education. He is formerly a doctoral candidate at the University of Kansas, in the department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. When not battling creationists or modeling species ranges, he writes about developments in progressive politics and the sciences.

The opinions expressed here are his own, do not reflect the official position of the NCSE. Indeed, older posts may no longer reflect his own official position.

Sb/DonorsChoose Drive


Thanks!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Subscribe to TfK:

Accolades

Best of Kansas City

Good posts from history

The Birth of Intelligent Falling

A failure of Intelligent Design

Why it's called Intelligent Design Creationism

Write a letter to the editor

My photo albums.

Support TfK

Buy me things from my Amazon.com wishlist.

Buy yourself things!

Search Now:
Search Amazon.com
Add yourself to the Frappr map!
Check out our Frappr or add yourself to it!

    follow me on Twitter

    « Louisiana House approves creationist bill | Main | Ben Stein is at it again »

    Mark Penn Cost Hillary the Nomination

    Category: Policy and Politics
    Posted on: June 12, 2008 4:35 PM, by Josh Rosenau

    Not just by being a double-dealing hack. He also Toverrode the best advice Hillary got about Iraq. The former chief pollster and lead strategist for the campaign explains:

    the rest of the campaign didn't want to tackle Iraq. They always felt that that was a losing proposition for her, and they always pulled it back.

    ....Why do you think the rest of the team was afraid to go after him?
    I think they thought that her position on Iraq wasn't strong enough to sustain a debate on Iraq.

    Or popular enough.
    Right. But her position, remember — we went through the early discussion of "Was it a mistake? Should she apologize?" Of course, the rest of the team wanted her to apologize. [laughs] And you know, she weathered that extremely well. She didn't apologize, because she had given a speech outlining her position. On that day. And that speech held up. It actually explained why she voted for Iraq and why it was a sincere vote at the time.

    Frankly, Iraq is the reason Hillary was never on my list of acceptable nominees. Not to say that I wouldn't have voted for her in the general election, but I would've voted for anyone else in the primary campaign, and I'm not alone in that judgment. Voting to invade Iraq was the biggest mistake she made, matched only by her vote for Joe Lieberman's "Bomb Iran" amendment. Her unwillingness to recognize and acknowledge that she really and truly screwed up in 2002 told me that she would make the same dumb mistake again, and it would have fatally crippled her ability to tie McCain to the war. Either she believed Bush's claim that Iraq was the next front in the war on terror, or she believed Bush when he said that the invasion resolution would just be used to threaten Iraq, or she was too afraid of looking weak on national security to stand up for what she knew to be right. None of those stances qualify someone to be President. The first wouldn't be so bad, since so many people got caught up in it, but then she shouldn't have been afraid to apologize for the vote. That she listened to Penn's advice and refused to apologize closed off her easiest out.

    There were other screwups after that, and Mark Penn's fingers were all over those, as well. Here's hoping that Mark Penn never works in Democratic politics again. Let's also hope that we get a few more Democratic politicians who are smart enough to recognize that sort of bad advice, and to reject both the message and the messenger.

    Share on Facebook
    Share on StumbleUpon
    Share on Facebook
    Find more posts in: Politics

    TrackBacks

    TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/73943

    Comments

    1

    The reasons you give are exactly the reasons why I voted for Obama in the Virginia primary. Of course, like you, I would have voted for Clinton in the general election had she won the nomination. There's is no way I would vote for McCain with his support for this misbegotten war that came close to shredding the constitutional balance of powers. (On that note: let's hear it for today's five-vote Supreme Court majority: huzzah! huzzah! huzzah!)

    Posted by: Elf Eye | June 12, 2008 7:02 PM

    Post a Comment

    (Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





    ScienceBlogs

    Search ScienceBlogs:

    Go to:

    Advertisement
    Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

    © 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.