Now on ScienceBlogs: The Galaxy's Biggest Valentine

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Thoughts from Kansas

You will notice that it lacks definiteness; that it lacks purpose; that it lacks coherence; that it lacks a subject to talk about; that it is loose and wabbly; that it wanders around; that it loses itself early and does not find itself any more. --Mark Twain

Search

Profile

Josh at work Joshua Rosenau spends his days defending the teaching of evolution at the National Center for Science Education. He is formerly a doctoral candidate at the University of Kansas, in the department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. When not battling creationists or modeling species ranges, he writes about developments in progressive politics and the sciences.

The opinions expressed here are his own, do not reflect the official position of the NCSE. Indeed, older posts may no longer reflect his own official position.

Sb/DonorsChoose Drive


Thanks!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Subscribe to TfK:

Accolades

Best of Kansas City

Good posts from history

The Birth of Intelligent Falling

A failure of Intelligent Design

Why it's called Intelligent Design Creationism

Write a letter to the editor

My photo albums.

Support TfK

Buy me things from my Amazon.com wishlist.

Buy yourself things!

Search Now:
Search Amazon.com
Add yourself to the Frappr map!
Check out our Frappr or add yourself to it!

    follow me on Twitter

    « Expelled poised to become number 2 | Main | Chickens come home to roost »

    Endorsements

    Category: Policy and Politics
    Posted on: October 20, 2008 2:17 PM, by Josh Rosenau

    While Barack Obama is lining up key endorsements from Colin Powell, major and local newspapers, and hundreds of thousands of small donors, it's worth watching the down-ticket races. Bob Geiger reviews Esquire Magazine's Endorsements. Geiger writes:

    Perhaps no incumbent senator more deserves to be run out on a rail for enabling George W. Bush's shredding of our Constitution than Republican Pat Roberts. While serving for years as chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Roberts gave the White House free reign while providing zero Congressional oversight. Here's Esquire: "As then-chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Roberts steadfastly defended the CIA as clean on torture and the NSA as clean on wiretapping--and just as steadfastly dragged his feet on investigating prewar intelligence failures for the tawdriest of reasons: to protect the White House. His opponent, a moderate former congressman, will do better."
    Vote for Jim Slattery.

    Esquire endorses Republican Jim Moran in the Big First, and backs both Democratic incumbents. Dennis Moore is endorsed as an "Easy choice here: vague values-and-terrorists talk from the challenger versus bipartisan accomplishment by the incumbent." Nancy Boyda is described as "A successful executive and lifelong pro-choice Republican, Boyda switched parties in 2003 over opposition to the war but retains her antitax, pro-business leanings. Which leaves pro-choice, antitax, pro-business Republican Jenkins free to campaign on what, exactly--change?"

    In Wichita, Esquire backs Donald Betts, a fantastic young state senator who has stood up against the war, against predatory lending, and for his community. Esquire writes that incumbent Republican Todd Tiahrt, "knee-deep in Abramoff and DeLay cash, deserves to be dumped for this sin alone. But let's keep things positive: His opponent is as accomplished a state legislator as you'll ever find."

    Kansans should also watch out for the State Board of Education races. Chris Renner is looking to unseat wingnut creationist Kathy Martin, science supporters Paul Casanova and David Dennis are looking to take the seat formerly occupied by creationist loon Steve Abrams, Carolyn Campbell is working to keep creationist Bob Meissner from taking Bill Wagnon's old seat, Walt Chappell is working to keep Carol Rupe's old district from falling into the hands of creationist Dennis Hedke, and in suburban Kansas City, Sue Storm and Mary Ca Ralstin are competing to take over the for the irreplacable Sue Gamble.

    Share on Facebook
    Share on StumbleUpon
    Share on Facebook
    Find more posts in: Politics

    TrackBacks

    TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/83908

    Comments

    1

    Josh,

    Any word on how Sean Tevis is doing?

    Posted by: James F | October 20, 2008 7:08 PM

    2

    Thanks for the heads up on the State BOE. It is possible that a Democrat could be also a creationist and I wasn't sure which way to go there.

    I still have problems with Moore voting for FISA.
    Most of his other votes I have no problem with.
    Nor do I have a problem with his responsiveness to my bitching.

    Posted by: Oldfart | October 21, 2008 4:21 AM

    Post a Comment

    (Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





    ScienceBlogs

    Search ScienceBlogs:

    Go to:

    Advertisement
    Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

    © 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.