Now on ScienceBlogs: The Galaxy's Biggest Valentine

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Thoughts from Kansas

You will notice that it lacks definiteness; that it lacks purpose; that it lacks coherence; that it lacks a subject to talk about; that it is loose and wabbly; that it wanders around; that it loses itself early and does not find itself any more. --Mark Twain

Search

Profile

Josh at work Joshua Rosenau spends his days defending the teaching of evolution at the National Center for Science Education. He is formerly a doctoral candidate at the University of Kansas, in the department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. When not battling creationists or modeling species ranges, he writes about developments in progressive politics and the sciences.

The opinions expressed here are his own, do not reflect the official position of the NCSE. Indeed, older posts may no longer reflect his own official position.

Sb/DonorsChoose Drive


Thanks!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Subscribe to TfK:

Accolades

Best of Kansas City

Good posts from history

The Birth of Intelligent Falling

A failure of Intelligent Design

Why it's called Intelligent Design Creationism

Write a letter to the editor

My photo albums.

Support TfK

Buy me things from my Amazon.com wishlist.

Buy yourself things!

Search Now:
Search Amazon.com
Add yourself to the Frappr map!
Check out our Frappr or add yourself to it!

    follow me on Twitter

    « Supertrain! | Main | On RFK, Jr. »

    Stay down!

    Category: Policy and Politics
    Posted on: November 6, 2008 9:08 PM, by Josh Rosenau

    So conservatives kinda got spanked on Tuesday, and they aren't happy. Not only are the conservablogs pissed, I'm getting endless discussions on TV and radio about how conservatism, or the Republican brand, can rebuild. But I don't care. If they don't rebuild, I don't know that anyone will be worse off.

    Disco. Inst. blogger and Kentucky Focus on the Family activist Martin Cothran tells his fellow conservatives to get over it, concluding:

    We will know that conservatism has righted itself when its adherents don't go into a funk when they lose one election.
    Cothran, apparently, hasn't noticed that this is the second major wave election in a row. Democrats picked up a Presidential landslide, 7-8 seats in the Senate (depending how Minnesota pans out), 21 or more House seats, after picking up 31 seats in the House and 6 in the Senate in 2006. That isn't "one election." It's 66-67 elections, and many of them were won by pretty stark margins.

    Here is a map of the counties where Republicans gained vote share between 2004 and 2008:

    Republican counties

    That isn't "one election," it's Appalachia versus the rest of America. It's a mandate. The country has rejected the failed policies and failed ideas of contemporary conservatism, and I say good riddance. Conservatives should be upset. They lost, and lost badly.

    I just don't want the media to waste my time with their wanderings in the desert. I will, however, enjoy watching the internal purges underway already.

    Share on Facebook
    Share on StumbleUpon
    Share on Facebook
    Find more posts in: Politics

    TrackBacks

    TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/85251

    Comments

    1

    Don't forget what happened in 1994.
    It's very important dems at least hold on to what they have - and preferably gain seats in 2010.

    Posted by: llewelly | November 6, 2008 10:54 PM

    2

    I do care if we don't have a second viable political party other than the Democrats. A one-party system is not a good thing. Checks and balances disappear in the bandwagon effect.

    What's more, voters will see that, and will happily elect more creationists in the drive to "throw out the bums."

    I really want to see a second viable political party rebuild itself. The Republican Party that recognized it was a mistake to the desires of those who, erm, live near me... go back to the values of individual freedom, fiscal responsibility would invigorate the national debate and give us a two-party system that might mean something other than cultural wars with ignorance. (The GOP currently *talks* about those values, but does just the opposite when in power; witness the Bush administration for the most egregious example ever.)

    Posted by: Rob Knop | November 7, 2008 7:51 AM

    3

    I don't disagree about the importance of multiple parties, I just don't care if that party is the Republican party. If the Libertarian Party or the Green Party managed to become more viable options, I wouldn't see the problem.

    Posted by: Josh Rosenau | November 7, 2008 11:08 AM

    Post a Comment

    (Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





    ScienceBlogs

    Search ScienceBlogs:

    Go to:

    Advertisement
    Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

    © 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.