Agosto is playing for time. Praises energy on both sides. Says he's open-minded. Willing to listen to everyone.
He's the swing vote. Everyone's hanging on his every word.
"I echo Bradley's comments," about the amount of commentary, but will vote against the amendment. Standards are good, well-written, he'll listen to the experts.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Mercer: Teach S&W of everything. It would be illegal to single out evolution. 6500 emails say keep S&W. He's been battered. This is a battle for freedom of speech. Teachers have a right to allow students to have questions. I note that teachers also have a right to maintain order in…
1:15 Dunbar just moved to amend the TEKS to restore the bogus S&W language rather than the language preferred by scientific and science education experts.
She's saying it will somehow stave off litigation. NO! It will bring litigation. Now she's saying other board members are disingenuous.…
Dunbar jumped in line, and is trying to reinsert a new 7(B), slightly varied from the one just stricken.
"analyze and evaluate the sufficiency of scientific explanations concerning any data of sudden appearance, stasis, and the sequential nature of groups in the fossil record."
Allen likes it…
Lawrence Allen proposes to strike the noxious 7B from Biology standards. That standard states: "analyze and evaluate the sufficiency or insufficiency of common ancestry to explain the sudden appearance, stasis, and sequential nature of groups in the fossil record."
McLeroy claims that evolution…