Now on ScienceBlogs: That Which I Sowed in Tears, I Now Reap in Joy: A Love Letter to my Beautiful Readers

Seed Media Group

Thoughts from Kansas

You will notice that it lacks definiteness; that it lacks purpose; that it lacks coherence; that it lacks a subject to talk about; that it is loose and wabbly; that it wanders around; that it loses itself early and does not find itself any more. --Mark Twain

Search

Profile

Josh at work Joshua Rosenau spends his days defending the teaching of evolution at the National Center for Science Education. He is also a graduate student at the University of Kansas, completing a doctorate in the department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. When not modeling species distributions or battling creationists, he writes about developments in progressive politics and the sciences.

The opinions expressed here are his own, do not reflect the official position of the NCSE. Indeed, older posts may no longer reflect his own official position.

Sb/DonorsChoose Drive


Thanks!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Subscribe to TfK:

Accolades

Best of Kansas City

Good posts from history

The Birth of Intelligent Falling

A failure of Intelligent Design

Why it's called Intelligent Design Creationism

Write a letter to the editor

My photo albums.

Support TfK

Affiliate programs: buy through the links, and TfK will get a percentage.

Buying some music for your friends?

Apple iTunes

Or maybe some gift certificates?

Buy me things from my Amazon.com wishlist.

Buy yourself things!

Search Now:
Search Amazon.com

Good government

Find your state legislators

Help elect sensible leaders

Re-Elect Nancy Boyda!

Internet neighbors

Add yourself to the Frappr map!
Check out our Frappr or add yourself to it!

Blogroll

« Defend Science in Texas | Main | Liveblagging the Texas science standards hearings »

Stupid answers to stupid questions

Category: Policy and Politics
Posted on: January 21, 2009 5:29 AM, by Josh Rosenau

Martin Cothran, who never met a logical error he didn't like, has a question about the inauguration:

If this isn't a Christian nation, then why are presidents (including this one) sworn in using a Bible, rather than, say, the Koran or Bagavad-Gita?
For the same reason it wasn't a White nation just because the first 43 presidents were all white, and neither is it a male nation just because all 44 so far have been men.

We'll elect a woman one day, and some day a Jew will place his or her hand on a copy of Tanakh and take the oath. One day someone will take the oath of office with a copy of the Vedas, and one day someone will, when posed the question "so help you God?" after the oath, politely decline that extraconstitutional addition.

The fact that all the Presidents elected thus far have been Christian (in some sense) doesn't make the nation Christian. To claim that it does is an exercise in faulty logic, and is unbecoming in someone who purports to teach logic.

The fact that America is not a Christian nation explains why my Jewish ancestors fled the officially Christian nations in which they were born. They wanted a place where official discrimination wouldn't keep them down. They wanted a place where they didn't have to fear pogroms, and where the army wouldn't sweep through their towns periodically, kidnapping the males of a certain age off to be cannon fodder in wars between nations competing for the mantle of true heir to the Christian tradition. They wanted to know that their descendants had a chance to be in Congress, and even to grow up to be President. Just because it hasn't happened yet doesn't mean it never will. If that sort of logic were valid, Barack Obama wouldn't be the President of these United States of America.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/92022

Comments

1

Mr. Cothran obviously doesn't even read history... One of the past President's took the oath with hand on law book, not bible. The world did not end, but it does show that Mr. Cothran is quite a maroon.

Posted by: J-Dog | January 21, 2009 6:30 AM

2

Or to put it another way, if this is a Christian nation, why is Joe Lieberman allowed to be a Senator?


/Ditto to the Jewish ancestors thing, by the way

Posted by: Carl | January 21, 2009 7:01 AM

3

Swearing on the bible is not illegal, just irrelevant.

It's my hope that some day a president chooses to be sworn in on a good introductory microbiology text, not just because microbiology is a great subject, but to illustrate the irrelevancy of putting one's favorite book on display to begin a Presidency (unless, as stated before, that book contains the country's laws you are swearing to uphold).

Posted by: Jason Failes | January 21, 2009 7:52 AM

4

Recently I shared a table with a woman who was surprised to learn that a Muslim individual is a member of the House of Representatives. Her comment: "Don't you have to be a citizen to be in the Congress?" As if only Christians could be citizens! For the first time ever I told a stranger that I am an atheist by stating "There is no religious test for citizenship. I am an atheist, and I am a citizen."

Posted by: Elf Eye | January 21, 2009 8:49 AM

5

Elf Eye:

For the first time ever I told a stranger that I am an atheist

In this state? That could be hazardous to your health.

Posted by: NJ | January 21, 2009 9:16 AM

6

John Quincy Adams was the one who used a Constitutional law book. Also, Theodore Roosevelt didn't use a Bible the first time he was sworn in. It was after an assassination, but still.

Posted by: Charles | January 21, 2009 10:52 AM

7

I heard yesterday that Lyndon Johnson also didn't have a Bible available after Kennedy's assassination. He did use a Book of Common Prayer found amoung JFK's things. Using a copy of the constitution sounds like a good idea to me.

Posted by: Marge | January 21, 2009 2:02 PM

8

Plus, the Constitution is so much lighter than it used to be, so no one with through out their backs.

Posted by: Modusoperandi | January 22, 2009 3:05 AM

9

Someone please take his keyboard away from him, not every President used a bible. The President and Vice President Elect get to choose if they want to place their hand on a book or not and what book(s).

Before you get high and mighty why don't you learn about a subject before talking out of your backside.

Posted by: eric | January 22, 2009 7:56 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM