Texas again: Don McLeroy wants to save students' souls

Praise Jebus, I'm not in Texas watching the hearings as Don McLeroy is considered for reappointment as chairman of the Texas Board of Education. Yeah, Don "Someone's got to stand up to the experts" McLeroy.

Praise Jebus also that Texas Freedom Network was there watching. And wouldn't you know it, McLeroy brought the crazy. Asked about his desire to challenge evolution in science classes, McLeroy says:

I think what we’re doing is destroying America’s soul in science.

Set aside that he previously stated that his goal is not religious indoctrination, but I'm pretty sure that saving students' souls is not a secular purpose in established Constitutional law.

The legislature is considering legislation which would strip the Board of Education of much of its power over textbooks, and I must say that the bill, SB 2275, can't pass soon enough.

More like this

The Washington Post points out that: as justices finished their work last week, two overarching truths about the court remained unchanged: It is sharply divided ideologically on some of the most fundamental constitutional questions, and the coming presidential election will determine its future…
An important principle in first amendment jurisprudence is that government actions must not be undertaken solely for the benefit of religion. In 1987, the Supreme Court considered a law passed by Louisiana that required teachers who presented "evolution-science" to "balance" it with "creation-…
Texas is gearing up to revise their state science standards. This is a big deal, because the standards Texas sets determine how textbooks are written not just for the Texas market, but for the rest of the nation. The fight over science standards now is a prelude to an imminent and much bigger…
For whatever reason, last year's hearings in the Texas Board of Education attacking the basics of science education got less attention than this year's nonsense over social studies and history. The Washington Monthly did a great article on the process last month, and now the New York Times…

Any legislation that prevents people like McLeroy from having an influence on the education of children in this country is a good, good thing, in my opinion. As long as SB 2275 doesn't throw the matter from the frying pan into the fire, I'm all for it!

It all comes down to exactly what happened in Kansas. A well-educated, well-experienced and well-informed writing group spent months writing the next-generation science standards only to have their work shredded in open committee by a bunch of morons led by a creationist.

Note that in Kansas, following the state election in which the creationist majority became the creationist minority, the standards were voted back to the writing committee's draft.

Set aside that he previously stated that his goal is not religious indoctrination, but I'm pretty sure that saving students' souls is not a secular purpose in established Constitutional law.

Yes, but the soul will be official science, if they get their way.

True, it won't be a secular purpose. Once science is hopelessly entangled with religion, there will be no secular purposes.

Glen D
http://tinyurl.com/6mb592