For some reason, people are only now realizing Christopher Hitchens' distaste for Mother Teresa. It's like they started paying attention to the world a week ago.
Thoughts from Kansas
You will notice that it lacks definiteness; that it lacks purpose; that it lacks coherence; that it lacks a subject to talk about; that it is loose and wabbly; that it wanders around; that it loses itself early and does not find itself any more. --Mark Twain
Search
Profile
Joshua Rosenau spends his days defending the teaching of evolution at the National Center for Science Education. He is also a graduate student at the University of Kansas, completing a doctorate in the department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. When not modeling species distributions or battling creationists, he writes about developments in progressive politics and the sciences.
The opinions expressed here are his own, do not reflect the official position of the NCSE. Indeed, older posts may no longer reflect his own official position.
Sb/DonorsChoose Drive
Thanks!
Recent Posts
- Point Counterpoint
- Headline of the day
- The devil you know
- Denying vaccines, evolution, and … dialog?
- Headline of the Day
- Tom Tancredo takes over for Jesse Helms
- Ben Stein waxes nostalgic
- Footprints in the sand
- Disco. finds a new way to be wrong
- Anti-abortion terrorist convicted
Recent Comments
- mark on Tom Tancredo takes over for Jesse Helms
- Tom on Point Counterpoint
- Jason Rosenhouse on Denying vaccines, evolution, and … dialog?
- Arthur Hunt on Point Counterpoint
- Phillip IV on Point Counterpoint
- Jim Kidder on Denying vaccines, evolution, and … dialog?
- J. J. Ramsey on Denying vaccines, evolution, and … dialog?
- Matt Penfold on Denying vaccines, evolution, and … dialog?
- Josh Rosenau on Denying vaccines, evolution, and … dialog?
- J. J. Ramsey on Denying vaccines, evolution, and … dialog?
Archives
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- August 2004
Subscribe to TfK:
Accolades
Good posts from history
The Birth of Intelligent Falling
A failure of Intelligent Design
Why it's called Intelligent Design Creationism
Support TfK
Affiliate programs: buy through the links, and TfK will get a percentage.Buying some music for your friends?
Or maybe some gift certificates?
Buy me things from my Amazon.com wishlist.
Buy yourself things!
Good government
Internet neighbors
Add yourself to the Frappr map!
Blogroll
« Global warming, science denial, and how to teach more evolution | Main | On counting »
Christopher Hitchens doesn't like Mother Theresa
Category: Policy and Politics
Posted on: October 31, 2009 11:15 PM, by Josh Rosenau
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/123736
Comments
In other DIsco news:
Archduke Franz Ferdinand assassinated.
What a bunch of pathetic wankers.
--
Martin
Posted by: MartinDH | November 1, 2009 5:39 AM
This is one of the things that Hitchens definitely gets right. Although to be honest I was very disappointed by "Missionary Position" because it was basically just this relentlessly vitriolic diatribe with a half-dozen or so facts propping it up. He could have done a much better job.
Posted by: apuleius platonicus | November 1, 2009 5:44 AM
So you are saying they gone far past the Enlightenment in history? You are so generous.
Posted by: a lurker | November 1, 2009 7:20 AM
Wow, they really are behind the times, aren't they. Next thing you'll know they'll have caught up with the fact that he has a pathological hatred of the Clintons. I've always suspected Bill got a date with a woman who turned Hitchens down back at Oxford. Either that or Hitchens figured out which side paid more in this decade.
There was a lot to criticize about Mother Teresa's administrative and medical knowledge, and her anti-contraception-anti-choice position too. But Hitchens isn't a credible critic.
Posted by: Anthony McCarthy | November 1, 2009 9:16 AM
But what about Francisco Franco? Is he still dead?
Posted by: Zeno
| November 1, 2009 10:56 AM
"...it’s a shame there is no hell for your bitch to go to." ~ Hitchens
Oh Hitchens, what's wrong with you? Seriously, you forgot to mention the hypocritical, pedophile Pope deserves a spot alongside that insane, deluded cunt.
Posted by: fsereqwrfwef | November 1, 2009 11:27 AM
I really like the theory about Hitchens and Clinton back in the day Oxford. But, yeah, it was probably the money. It would be very interesting to see a plot of his income before and after he became a cheerleader for the War on Terror and the invasion of Iraq.
Posted by: apuleius platonicus | November 1, 2009 12:49 PM
Never was there a more inappropriate name than the Discover Institute.
Posted by: T. Bruce McNeely | November 1, 2009 4:49 PM
Of course, I mean the Discovery Institute.
Posted by: T. Bruce McNeely | November 1, 2009 5:36 PM