Now on ScienceBlogs: What's the buzz?: Synthetic marijuana, K2, Spice, JWH-018
You will notice that it lacks definiteness; that it lacks purpose; that it lacks coherence; that it lacks a subject to talk about; that it is loose and wabbly; that it wanders around; that it loses itself early and does not find itself any more. --Mark Twain
Joshua Rosenau spends his days defending the teaching of evolution at the National Center for Science Education. He is also a graduate student at the University of Kansas, completing a doctorate in the department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. When not modeling species distributions or battling creationists, he writes about developments in progressive politics and the sciences.
The opinions expressed here are his own, do not reflect the official position of the NCSE. Indeed, older posts may no longer reflect his own official position.
Thanks!
The Birth of Intelligent Falling
A failure of Intelligent Design
Why it's called Intelligent Design Creationism
Buying some music for your friends?
Or maybe some gift certificates?
Buy me things from my Amazon.com wishlist.
Buy yourself things!
« Thoughts from Kairo | Main | On false dichotomies »
Category: Policy and Politics
Posted on: November 23, 2009 4:27 PM, by Josh Rosenau
Just back from Egypt, and still not ready for craziness. So please no one steal a lot of emails from climate scientists and try to dishonestly present a few snippets from them as evidence of a global conspiracy, OK?
Also, could everyone stop blogging for a day or two, just until I catch up? Thanks.
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/125375
PZ Myers 02.09.2010
PZ Myers 02.08.2010
Greg Laden 02.08.2010
Tim Lambert 02.09.2010
ERV 02.09.2010
Comments
LMAO...I can't wait to hear your spin on Climategate. Get out the blender boy!
Posted by: FtK | November 25, 2009 9:12 AM
This thing has legs and it's getting ridiculous. I have Facebook friends sending me op-eds from the Wall Street Journal that they believe prove all of climate science is a fraud. I know a lot about evolutionary biology, but very little about climate change, and I'm certain I'm going to get dragged into any number of arguments about this. I look forward to a lot of debunking (although I haven't seen a clear picture of what scientists are supposed to debunk: something about deleted emails, using different sets of data to make other data sets make sense, and tax fraud). By the way, I probably know a lot about evolution thanks to NCSE. Thank you.
Posted by: David Estlund | November 26, 2009 11:36 PM