Now on ScienceBlogs: HeartlandGate: Anti-Science Institute's Insider Reveals Secrets

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Thoughts from Kansas

You will notice that it lacks definiteness; that it lacks purpose; that it lacks coherence; that it lacks a subject to talk about; that it is loose and wabbly; that it wanders around; that it loses itself early and does not find itself any more. --Mark Twain

Search

Profile

Josh at work Joshua Rosenau spends his days defending the teaching of evolution at the National Center for Science Education. He is formerly a doctoral candidate at the University of Kansas, in the department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. When not battling creationists or modeling species ranges, he writes about developments in progressive politics and the sciences.

The opinions expressed here are his own, do not reflect the official position of the NCSE. Indeed, older posts may no longer reflect his own official position.

Sb/DonorsChoose Drive


Thanks!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Subscribe to TfK:

Accolades

Best of Kansas City

Good posts from history

The Birth of Intelligent Falling

A failure of Intelligent Design

Why it's called Intelligent Design Creationism

Write a letter to the editor

My photo albums.

Support TfK

Buy me things from my Amazon.com wishlist.

Buy yourself things!

Search Now:
Search Amazon.com
Add yourself to the Frappr map!
Check out our Frappr or add yourself to it!

    follow me on Twitter

    « Thoughts from Kakistocracy | Main | Dear world »

    Thoughts from Kairo

    Category: Policy and Politics
    Posted on: November 16, 2009 12:11 AM, by Josh Rosenau

    Alexandria, actually, but still.

    I'm here at the British Council's conference on Darwin's Living Legacy. It's really a remarkable event, bringing together brilliant biologists from around the world to talk about how the research program begun by Darwin continues today, as well as historians and philosophers giving us a nuanced view of Darwin himself and the reception of his ideas around the world, not to mention sociologists and education experts exploring contemporary reactions to Darwin's ideas (including my own talk comparing Islamic creationist rhetoric with that of American creationists).

    As always, the informal interactions after the projectors are turned off are the most memorable. How often do you get to see John Hedley Brook run up and give Ronald Numbers a high five after a huge soccer victory? To pose a question to Numbers and Brook and Peter Bowler and Bernard Lightman all at once? To wander through the rebuilt Library of Alexandria or around Pompey's Pillar, within sight of the foundations of yet another wonder of the classical world – Alexandria's Lighthouse?

    Copious photographs upon my return, and some broader reflections. Also, some thoughts on Egypt more broadly.

    Anyway, back home it looks like people are freaking out because the fuckers who planned 9/11 are finally going on trial. "Oh, woe is me!," conservatives write. "How dare we bring terrorists in chains to a public trial for their heinous acts?" While the terrorists would have won had, among other things, the Academy Awards been delayed, it apparently has no meaning for us to abandon our core values and adopt the sort of authoritarianism and political opacity that the terrorists and their sponsors would like to impose.

    The idea of offering a fair and open trial for criminals is fairly novel in the grand sweep of history, and the United States is noteworthy and praiseworthy for insisting as a matter of constitutional requirement that only such a process could be used to imprison people. Egypt has no great reputation on these matters, and our ability to encourage them to do the right thing rests in part on our own consistency in these regards. The US did fine convicting and imprisoning Egyptian cleric Omar Abdel-Rahman, tried in New York and safely imprisoned on US soil for a decade thus far. We can do that for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.

    That's the way to do things, and we only win over terrorism when we reject terroristic practices in our own capacity, whether those practices are torture or summary judgments or secret prisons.

    Meanwhile: No one could have predicted that voting to protect rapists from a courtroom trial would be politically unpopular.

    Share on Facebook
    Share on StumbleUpon
    Share on Facebook

    TrackBacks

    TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/124848

    Post a Comment

    (Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





    ScienceBlogs

    Search ScienceBlogs:

    Go to:

    Advertisement
    Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

    © 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.