Now on ScienceBlogs: Oldest Human-Made Object in Space

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Thoughts from Kansas

You will notice that it lacks definiteness; that it lacks purpose; that it lacks coherence; that it lacks a subject to talk about; that it is loose and wabbly; that it wanders around; that it loses itself early and does not find itself any more. --Mark Twain

Search

Profile

Josh at work Joshua Rosenau spends his days defending the teaching of evolution at the National Center for Science Education. He is formerly a doctoral candidate at the University of Kansas, in the department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. When not battling creationists or modeling species ranges, he writes about developments in progressive politics and the sciences.

The opinions expressed here are his own, do not reflect the official position of the NCSE. Indeed, older posts may no longer reflect his own official position.

Sb/DonorsChoose Drive


Thanks!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Subscribe to TfK:

Accolades

Best of Kansas City

Good posts from history

The Birth of Intelligent Falling

A failure of Intelligent Design

Why it's called Intelligent Design Creationism

Write a letter to the editor

My photo albums.

Support TfK

Buy me things from my Amazon.com wishlist.

Buy yourself things!

Search Now:
Search Amazon.com
Add yourself to the Frappr map!
Check out our Frappr or add yourself to it!

    follow me on Twitter

    « Shorter Discovery Institute's Bruce Chapman | Main | The stupids »

    Analogies

    Category: Policy and Politics
    Posted on: December 6, 2009 9:16 PM, by Josh Rosenau

    TalkingPointsMemo notes an odd simile, using the headline: Tom Friedman Compares Afghanistan To "Special Needs Baby". Friedman told Fareed Zakaria:

    This is nation building. This is nation building 101 in the most fragmented country in the world. Fareed, we're talking about Afghanistan. And we're talking about America in the middle of the great recession. I feel like we're like an unemployed couple who just went out and decided to adopt a special needs baby. You know, I mean, that's really kind of what we're doing. And that's like, whoa, y'know, that terrifies me.
    Friedman's error isn't what kind of baby he thinks Afghanistan might be, it's the premise that invading and occupying a sovereign country is like an adoption.

    If we take this simile in its strongest form, such that there is a comparison drawn between each element, we wind up with:

    1. USA compared to an unemployed couple
    2. sending ~100,000 troops into another country compared to adoption
    3. Afghanistan compared to special needs baby
    Of all the parallels in that analogy, calling Afghanistan "special needs" may be the least offensive to all involved. Its needs are special, it's rate of growth is abnormal and unhealthy, and Afghanistan does need more help than many countries do to function normally. That said, it's managed to kick the asses of several of history's mightiest empires, including Alexander the Great's, Great Britain's, the Soviets', and (possibly) America's. Hardly the sort of thing most babies do, however special it might be.

    That analogy is interesting to discuss, at least, while the parallels between adoption and a military occupation are … deeply disturbing. And you know what, Friedman's been selling that line for a while now. It's absurd, offensive to the Afghans, to our troops (or, as Friedman would have it until this September, "babysitters"), and of course, to actual adoptive parents.

    For a long time, I assumed Friedman's request that Iraqis "Suck. On. This." was a reference to the male genitalia. But maybe he thinks we adopted Iraq, and just wanted them to nurse.

    Share on Facebook
    Share on StumbleUpon
    Share on Facebook

    TrackBacks

    TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/126558

    Post a Comment

    (Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





    ScienceBlogs

    Search ScienceBlogs:

    Go to:

    Advertisement
    Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

    © 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.