Thoughts from Kansas
You will notice that it lacks definiteness; that it lacks purpose; that it lacks coherence; that it lacks a subject to talk about; that it is loose and wabbly; that it wanders around; that it loses itself early and does not find itself any more. --Mark Twain
Search
Profile
Joshua Rosenau spends his days defending the teaching of evolution at the National Center for Science Education. He is formerly a doctoral candidate at the University of Kansas, in the department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. When not battling creationists or modeling species ranges, he writes about developments in progressive politics and the sciences.
The opinions expressed here are his own, do not reflect the official position of the NCSE. Indeed, older posts may no longer reflect his own official position.
Sb/DonorsChoose Drive
Thanks!
Recent Posts
- Sharpened stakes testing
- His genes made him do it
- Pascal's lament and E. B. White
- Free contraception for everyone!
- Godwin's Law
- NCSE takes on climate change
- A new identity?
- Belief is part of identity
- Endlessly classy
- Does Jerry Coyne read his own blog?
Recent Comments
- Anthony McCarthy on His genes made him do it
- TB on His genes made him do it
- robertm on His genes made him do it
- NickMatzke on His genes made him do it
- Matti K.. on His genes made him do it
- Jeremy Stangroom on His genes made him do it
- Anthony McCarthy on Free contraception for everyone!
- Marion Delgado on Godwin's Law
- Anthony McCarthy on Godwin's Law
- Greg Laden on Belief is part of identity
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- August 2004
Subscribe to TfK:
Accolades
Good posts from history
The Birth of Intelligent Falling
A failure of Intelligent Design
Why it's called Intelligent Design Creationism
Support TfK
Buy me things from my Amazon.com wishlist.
Buy yourself things!
Add yourself to the Frappr map!
« Some thoughts on programming | Main | Civil Rights advocate sues to deny civil rights »
Intelligent falling, redux
Posted on: December 11, 2009 4:02 PM, by Josh Rosenau
A few weeks ago, the makers of water-rocket launcher the Aquapod sent me a review copy of their device. It's a plastic tripod with a bike pump nozzle and a pressure valve to prevent your pressurized water bottle from exploding on the launch pad. A string and simple latch hold the bottle in place, and a tug launches the bottle up to 100 feet into the air.
One fine autumn afternoon, several of my NCSE colleagues and I headed out to test the Aquapod in a nearby park. There's nothing like people fussing around with strange equipment to draw a crowd, and we soon had a dozen or so people, ranging from about 4 to a few early teenagers and several parents, watching the test. After the first successful launch, all the kids wanted a turn, and many swore they'd ask for one as a present this year.
As you see in the video above, put together by my colleague Steve Newton, there were some technical difficulties along the way, but once we got a low enough angle on the string, it wasn't hard to launch repeatedly, and to great joy and amusement by the assembled kids.
When the weather warms a bit, I'll see about disabling the safety valve and refining the shape of the water bottles to improve launch characteristics. This is necessary, of course, to fully test the important scientific insights of Intelligent Falling.
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/126991
Comments
That's not flying. It's falling, with style.
You couldn't have organised this for my visit?
Posted by: John S. Wilkins | December 11, 2009 5:31 PM
I don't know if mine was the first like this, but I had one of these in the early 50's. Of course, it was not a water bottle, it was shaped like a standard SF rocket, but used the same principle and gathered the same crowds.
Posted by: Gray Gaffer | December 11, 2009 5:51 PM
This guy: http://sciencetoymaker.org/ has an awesome circa 1989 page with, among many other great things to build, a simple and easy to make one of these devices. But his is an overhead launcher (you hold it on a short pole), to prevent it from launching into someone's face.
Getting a 2L bottle in the face at close range could easily knock out a few teeth. The model you have looks dangerous: it is small and at ground level, and looked like several people were hovering over it as it was pumped up; and it tipped over when you tried to launch it, which could easily cause it to launch horizontally.
-kevin
Posted by: kevin | December 11, 2009 6:14 PM