Now on ScienceBlogs: HeartlandGate: Anti-Science Institute's Insider Reveals Secrets

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Thoughts from Kansas

You will notice that it lacks definiteness; that it lacks purpose; that it lacks coherence; that it lacks a subject to talk about; that it is loose and wabbly; that it wanders around; that it loses itself early and does not find itself any more. --Mark Twain

Search

Profile

Josh at work Joshua Rosenau spends his days defending the teaching of evolution at the National Center for Science Education. He is formerly a doctoral candidate at the University of Kansas, in the department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. When not battling creationists or modeling species ranges, he writes about developments in progressive politics and the sciences.

The opinions expressed here are his own, do not reflect the official position of the NCSE. Indeed, older posts may no longer reflect his own official position.

Sb/DonorsChoose Drive


Thanks!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Subscribe to TfK:

Accolades

Best of Kansas City

Good posts from history

The Birth of Intelligent Falling

A failure of Intelligent Design

Why it's called Intelligent Design Creationism

Write a letter to the editor

My photo albums.

Support TfK

Buy me things from my Amazon.com wishlist.

Buy yourself things!

Search Now:
Search Amazon.com
Add yourself to the Frappr map!
Check out our Frappr or add yourself to it!

    follow me on Twitter

    « May they shrink up and blow away | Main | ATTEMPT NO LANDINGS THERE »

    Seeing things in a new light

    Category: Policy and Politics
    Posted on: March 18, 2010 11:37 AM, by Josh Rosenau

    I don't care for North Korea. It's a repressive Stalinist cult, walled off from reality. But sometimes they find a nut:

    A government official in North Korea blamed for the nation's currency devaluation has been executed by the state. "Pak Nam-gi, who was reportedly sacked in January as chief of the planning and finance department of the ruling Workers' Party, was executed at a shooting range in Pyongyang."
    Maybe if we stood a few of the banksters in front of a firing squad, we wouldn't have to fix their mess again.

    Share on Facebook
    Share on StumbleUpon
    Share on Facebook

    TrackBacks

    TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/133975

    Comments

    1

    Hmm. I'm pretty sure that Kirshenbaum, Mooney, and the Intersection crew won't approve of your advocating violence like this . . .

    Posted by: Physicalist Author Profile Page | March 18, 2010 12:39 PM

    2

    "Maybe if we stood a few of the banksters in front of a firing squad, we wouldn't have to fix their mess again."

    True - we would have to fix someone else's mess. Which is why we (what most people refer to as the civilized world) don't bother shooting people for screwing up - it doesn't help.

    Plus, of course, poor Pak Nam-gi probably wasn't the only guy who screwed up - he is was just the guy with the fewest political connections.

    Since everyone in NK knows the real reason Pak specifically was shot, everyone is now (more) focused on making sure they have the proper connections rather than on getting the job done right. Which is another reason why we (what most people refer to as the civilized world) don't bother shooting people for screwing up - it's a distraction.

    Posted by: NoAstronomer | March 18, 2010 1:59 PM

    3

    North Korea is pretty much a racist military state:

    http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/02/22/north_koreas_race_problem?hidecomments=yes

    Military states aren't capitalist per se, nor are they socialist or communist. On the one hand, the army way is kind of war-socialism-looking. On the other hand, militarism (domestic or foreign) is one of the two legitimate functions of government for the libertarian capitalist, and market fundamentalists won't limit tax spending on it, nor do they demonize cops and troops as they demonize everyone else working for gummint."

    DRK is like China - it kills people as scapegoats. A banker with close ties to the Kim family and the government would not be shot - you "make an example" of someone and instead of it changing behavior, it says, be better-connected next time, and quit while you're ahead, and don't be unlucky enough to be scapegoatable when we're going to admit to 1% of our economic problems.

    The above link is not just one author in Foreign Policy's opinion. It's shared by a lot of f.p. analysts now.

    Posted by: Marion Delgado | March 19, 2010 9:53 AM

    4

    But in fairness, the bankers in the G20 didn't just screw up, many of them, especially in the US, are simply criminals who are too powerful to have the law touch them - either laws are rewritten for their benefit or the enforcement of laws is de-funded and shut down. So it's possible Josh's quip has a tinge of truth to it.

    It's not a "mistake" when you're simply ripping people off.

    Posted by: Marion Delgado | March 19, 2010 10:08 AM

    5

    Plus, of course, poor Pak Nam-gi probably wasn't the only guy who screwed up - he is was just the guy with the fewest political connections.

    Posted by: capsiplex | March 19, 2010 1:10 PM

    Post a Comment

    (Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





    ScienceBlogs

    Search ScienceBlogs:

    Go to:

    Advertisement
    Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

    © 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.