Now on ScienceBlogs: The death of Tetrapod Zoology

Enter to Win

The Cheerful Oncologist

"Courage and cheerfulness will not only carry you over the rough places in life, but will enable you to bring comfort and help to the weak-hearted and will console you in the sad hours." -Sir William Osler

« Theobroma Cacao - "Food of the Gods" | Main | This Day in Medicine - April 12th »

Former Sen. Fred Thompson Has Marginal Zone Lymphoma

Category: Commentary
Posted on: April 11, 2007 2:09 PM, by Craig Hildreth

In an interview with Fox News Channel's Neil Cavuto, the former Tennessee senator, 64, said a doctor conducting a physical in 2004 found a bump on his neck, which turned out to be non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. He said the disease is in remission with no illness or symptoms...

Cancer is getting quite a bit of attention in the political news these days, what with Elizabeth Edwards, Tony Snow and now another prominent name announcing that he has been treated for what I call the "cowardly affliction." Today possible presidential candidate Fred Thompson revealed that he has been treated with the anti-CD-20 monoclonal antibody rituximab for a marginal zone lymphoma found in a cervical lymph node. Both Thompson and his medical oncologist Dr. Bruce Cheson stated that the former senator and actor is still in remission.

That's it, folks. That's all I can glean out of the 350 news stories bouncing around the internet. I suppose it would be inappropriate to give out all the details of Mr. Thompson's lymphoma, but at this med blog we pride ourselves on asking the hard questions, and if I was a reporter attending that press conference I would stand up and ask for a little more information about his illness, especially since Thompson is thinking of running for president.

"Yes, you in the dingy lab coat in the back - do you have a question?"

"Thank you; I have several questions if you please.

"One: What type of marginal zone lymphoma does he have? Extranodal? Nodal? Splenic? Gastric-associated MALT? Disseminated?

"Two: What is his Ann Arbor stage, and more importantly, what is his FLIPI score?

"Three: Did the rituximab put him into complete remission, or was he already in remission when he took the treatment?

"Four: Has the senator been tested for infection with Hepatitis C virus?

"Five: Are you planning on giving him maintenance rituximab?

"Six:

marginal%20zone%20lymphoma.jpg

bloo00637004x.jpg

Any comment?"

"Sorry, I didn't understand your question - You seemed to be speaking in graphic form."

"What I asked was since the average overall survival for marginal zone lymphoma is nine years [top graph] but the average overall survival for nodal marginal zone lymphoma is only five years [bottom graph], and Senator Thompson stated his lymphoma was in a lymph node, can you tell us what the typical prognosis is for a patient with the exact type, stage, FLIPI prognostic index and age as Mr. Thompson?"

"No."

Like I said, folks, we know all the tough questions here at The Cheerful Oncologist, but are unlikely to ever get to ask them, let alone get a straight answer. Before I pull the lever for a presidential candidate with marginal zone lymphoma, though, I would like to know how things are going health-wise, if you know what I mean. His health, not mine. I feel just fine, thank you.

Comments

1

If one was being truly heinous, one might leap to the conclusion that all these public figures suddenly coming out of the woodwork regarding their various 'battles with cancer' was an attempt to garner the sympathy vote. But then again, what politician would do that?

Posted by: Fiona | April 11, 2007 4:29 PM

2

Craig, why don't you email Cheson directly? His bio at NCI is here and a little digging around the NCI site and Google should give you an email address.

Posted by: Melanie | April 11, 2007 5:41 PM

3

Why shouldn't he run? VP Cheney is a walking disease surrounded by MDs who are there to treat him and any of his shooting victims.
Didn't keep him from being VP and get us into Iraq.
Maybe Thompson can get us out...
Besides he's a pretty good actor which should help him if he makes it to the White House.

Posted by: Cancer Survivor | April 11, 2007 6:48 PM

4

I'd rather have Fred Thompson; for however long he's able to contribute; over any of the current front runners. There's not a dimes worth of difference between any of them on either side. Thompson offers something different; and frankly; thoughtful and refreshing.

Posted by: Tom Browne | April 11, 2007 8:39 PM

5

Maybe I'm missing something, but why do you call cancer the "cowardly affliction"?

Inquiring minds (well, one, anyway) would like to know.

Thanks,

Jeanne
The Assertive Cancer Patient
www.assertivepatient.com

Posted by: Jeanne Sather | April 16, 2007 12:01 AM

6

To Jeanne:

I find it easier to hate cancer by using pejorative anthropomorphic terms when talking about it. Also, cowardly means weakly or basely fearful in the presence of danger, and as you know once cancer cells get damaged or cut off from their growth signals they commit suicide, rather than continue to fight.

Posted by: The Cheerful Oncologist | April 16, 2007 5:21 PM

7

According to this article:
http://www.medpagetoday.com/HematologyOncology/LeukemiaLymphoma/tb/5424
Fred Thompson has nodal marginal zone lymphoma.

From your chart the average survival is about 5 years. But the chart is from an article written in 2000 and didn't include Rituximab as a treatment option.

Do you have any info on survival rates for patients treated with Rituximab?

Thanks.

Posted by: BillCarson | June 2, 2007 4:53 AM

8

There is an excellent chance that he will live a normal life span and will not have another occurrence of the disease. Cancer stands for "spreading" evil and it is anything the medical community can not stop with a pill or a treatment. Any disease that can not be stopped is a cancer...period. Some of these diseases kill and others do not. Lymphomas are usually very slow growing and making positive life style changes usually helps slow down the progression of the disease and many other diseases. Fred will be around long enough to contribute.... if he is elected.

Posted by: Lew Orban | January 10, 2008 10:18 PM

9

"Cancer stands for "spreading" evil and it is anything the medical community can not stop with a pill or a treatment. Any disease that can not be stopped is a cancer...period."

So arthritis, heart disease; dandruff, strokes and AIDS are forms of cancer?

Posted by: Ian Gould | January 12, 2008 6:34 AM

10

thank you

Posted by: youtube | February 17, 2008 10:05 AM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Collective Imagination
Enter to win the daily giveaway
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.