Muvmuv Brewer calls her cancer Theo, asbestos is the culprit

Phillip Northmore worked for the UK’s Ministry of Defense in Plymouth, England from 1963 to 1966. His job as a lagger meant he spent his day repairing and applying asbestos insulation around pipes and ductwork in the bowels of buildings. His wife recalled him coming home from work covered in dust. It would take three washings to get his work clothes clean because the water would turn white from the thick dust.

Debbie “Muvmuv” Brewer is Phillip Northmore’s eldest daughter. She was a pre-schooler when her dad worked as a lagger. Four decades later in 2006, Northmore died from an asbestos-related pulmonary disease and Muvmuv was diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma. Her most likely source of exposure was her dad’s clothing.

“He would have been mortified if he ever thought he would have given any of his four daughters this life sentence,” she said.

Brewer spoke this weekend at the 8th Annual International Asbestos Awareness Conference, describing her experience with “Theo,” the name she’s given the tumor inside her chest wall. When she waited recently for the latest results of a CT scan, she noted how she was waiting

“to find out if Theo had moved at all or if he has been a typical lazy man and sat on the sofa watching TV. He must be the only male I want to stay as a couch potato.”


One thing’s for sure, Muvmuv is as far from a couch potato as one could get. In fact, the “Meso Warriors” as they call themselves and other asbestos-disease awareness activists are waging two battles. The first, surviving their diseases, and the second, fighting for a global ban on the mining and use of all forms of asbestos. More than two million tonnes of asbestos are still produced worldwide annually, compounding the billions of tonnes already existing in buildings and infrastructure. Peak use in the U.S. occurred from 1950 to 1974, with as much as 1.58 million pounds imported per year.

The European Union banned the use of asbestos in 1996, and a total of 55 countries have done the same. The U.S. however has not, and we still allow the deadly mineral to be imported and used. According to the U.S. Geological Survey, about a thousand metric tonnes of raw asbestos were imported into our country last year. There are no requirements for importers to tell us where it was shipped or how it will be used. Those thousand metric tonnes are in addition to the asbestos-containing products that are also imported into our country.

GIven the following facts, how do we explain to children why we haven’t banned asbsestos?

Asbestos is a proven human carcinogen and there is no safe level of exposure.

Asbestos fibers can cause asbestosis, lung and gastrointestinal cancers, and an aggressive cancer called mesothelioma. The average life expectancy of a mesothelioma patient is six – twelve months.

Asbestos diseases have a 10 – 50 year latency period from initial exposure to development of disease.

Chrysotile asbestos accounts for nearly 95% of asbestos mined and exported today.

Asbestos fibers can be nearly 700 times smaller than human hair and are odorless, tasteless, indestructible fibers that can remain suspended in the air for seconds.

More than 100,000 individuals die annually from asbestos-related disease.

My answer: Greed.

Comments

  1. #1 mike crill
    April 9, 2012

    Thank you for this story of this amazing lady of hope for the millions today walking in her shoes hoping for a cure and to save a life. I too am a “Gladiator” for the truth and I save children.Libby Mike Crill. God Bless.

  2. #2 Theo Bromine
    April 10, 2012

    And here in Canada, the government does a makeover of asbestos, renaming it “chrysotile”, propping up the industry, and claiming that it’s not a problem that we are exporting it to places like India, since people “over there” are more resistant to environmental contaminants.

  3. #3 NJ
    April 10, 2012

    TB@2:

    renaming it “chrysotile”

    Or, perhaps they are using the mineralogically correct name as opposed to “renaming” it as you sneer quoted.

    How about we stay on factual ground and recognize that the generic term ‘asbestos’ can refer to two very different materials (amphiboles and serpentines) that in some cases have similar morphologies?

    I now fully expect to be lambasted for defending an industry and dangerous practices when in fact I did no more than insist we keep the terminology straight.

  4. #4 Theo Bromine
    April 13, 2012

    [disclaimer - my nom-du-net is unrelated to the unfortunate Muvmmuv Brewer's cancer]

    I now fully expect to be lambasted for defending an industry and dangerous practices when in fact I did no more than insist we keep the terminology straight.

    Got an axe to grind? I save my lambasting for unsupportable or false claims – fact-based statements are welcomed, and I do not at this poing see you providing a defence for the industry or its practices.

    Though I am not a professional chemist or geologist, I do agree with the goal of using scientifically accurate terminology as much as possible. However, I remain unconvinced that the goal of creating the “Chrysotile Institute” was to educate the public in geology, as opposed to doing a makeover of the image of asbestos.

    Scientific evidence seems to point to the conclusion that chrysotile asbestos can be manufactured and used safely under controlled conditions. The fact remains that the asbestos industry, supported by the Canadian and Quebec government are promoting the export of chrysotile to countries where it is less likely that the safety requirements will be met.

  5. #5 NJ
    April 13, 2012

    I responded to Theo earlier today (largely agreeing), but the SB moderation seems to be sitting on it.

  6. #6 cmonforton
    May 25, 2012

    NJ,
    We at The Pump Handle don’t screen our comments; they are feeling posted automatically. (We will remove computer-generated gibberish, or really offensive comments.) I’m not sure why the comment you suggest you wrote isn’t appearing.
    Celeste