I am working on some very smart things to say here. Really. Meanwhile, there's 
Thanks to gaddeswarup who linked to Current Science, an academic science publication in India, I went over to read the current issue. Featured in it under "Astrology and science" is a letter from R V Karanth (of the Geological Society of India), who was commenting about an earlier article on astrology. I quote,
It is true that astrology is unscientific, at least for those who do not believe in it. I being a `non-believer' vehemently used to argue against the belief in astrology and wearing stones for astrological purposes. Nevertheless, of late, I have a feeling that believing in astrology should not be discouraged and condemned, as it has a tremendous psychological effect on the mind, which in turn brings a person solace and the positive effect of psychology is capable of curing a disease. After all, most ailments are psychological rather than physical. It is the worry of some type or the other that takes a heavy toll on a person's health and behaviour. Here, we are dealing with the human mind, not science as such. If a `blind belief' can bring joy to a person, should we not welcome it? Similarly, the belief in God brings solace to a `believer'. Is being `unscientific' a bliss?With all due respect, this is condescending and sloppy thinking at best. The human condition is, of course, a complex one and no doubt irrationality shares the stage and will not go away. But, that does not mean it has to be welcomed. If we welcome 'blind belief', we are sending wrong signals to everyone, particularly to the young minds. This attitude does not befit anyone who has even a remote association with science (which is, everyone). Losing the passion to stand up for science and reason is the road to hell. It is rather unfortunate to see such patronizing tone when there are better things that can be done. Soft-pedalling by academics and intellectuals on issues like this will undermine the very cause they work towards.
Comments
yes that's what we Indians need the most : to be more fatalistic and be able to blame the planets and the stars for our fate. Furthermore, how long before astrology splits into two factions based on what the entry of Jupiter into the third quadrant of the sun means for mankind and start killing each other over it?
Posted by: gawker | September 18, 2006 10:32 PM
I was wondering yesterday. It is an academic science publication and this is the kind of thinking gets aired there? I do hope those who read read it would send a note to the editor expressing their concerns (I did).
Posted by: Selva | September 19, 2006 5:57 AM