The God Delusion is the new book by Richard Dawkins. Readers of Dawkins would already know Dawkins position on religion. Beebs has an interview with Dawkins in it's Newsnight programme. You can watch the video online. Quite interesting. Prospect Magazine has a review which is worth a read if you want to see the kind of reactions that Dawkins evokes in some people.
The Scientific Indian
Science as a way of life
Search
Profile
I am working on some very smart things to say here. Really. Meanwhile, there's this and this. Welcome.
Suggestions
Recent Posts
- Entangled Reality
- A matter of Life and er... Matter
- Things Fall Apart, in India
- Raymond Carver: On Writing
- Pollution in China
- Gin and Tonic
- Higgs Bosons from the future are messing about at LHC
- Bladeless fan
- Could Evolution Stop?
- The Boy Who Harnessed The Wind
Recent Comments
- anon on A matter of Life and er... Matter
- Len on A matter of Life and er... Matter
- God on A matter of Life and er... Matter
- Sun on A matter of Life and er... Matter
- Universe on A matter of Life and er... Matter
- Dhaval Rathod on Raymond Carver: On Writing
- IanW on Raymond Carver: On Writing
- small indian cock on How a man's penis got so big
- Deepankar Pradhan on Is there a limit to human memory?
- andy on Gin and Tonic
RSS Feed
Today's recommendations
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
« The Wretched Life of a Bee | Main | Unstrung in the New Yorker »
The God Delusion by Dawkins
Category: Prime Stream
Posted on: September 25, 2006 6:55 AM, by Selva
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/22019
Comments
A very positive review in the Grauniad
The Grauniad prints an excerpt
Posted by: somnilista, FCD | September 25, 2006 5:15 PM
From Guardian: "an arcane survival mechanism is operating in grossly distorted circumstances". Worth pondering.
Posted by: Selva | September 26, 2006 3:35 AM
That review in Prospect was pure dreck.
Yet under Stalin almost the entire Orthodox priesthood was exterminated simply for being priests, as were the clergy of other religions and hundreds of thousands of Baptists. Oh, not this nonsense again! Yes, Stalin killed the priesthood. But it was not them being priests, it was that they were an ecclesiastical institution that held political power. Stalin also killed his secular political opposition, even that within his own party. Stalin came from the Czarist tradition that glorified absolute power, i.e., he was far more of a Russian than he was an atheist.
Literally everything in that review is as daft as that. China doesn't allow free speech, French Revolution, Tamil Tigers were suicide bombers too. Nothing of substance, no actual answers to Dawkins' arguments. Like I said, pure dreck. I'm dumber from having read it.
Posted by: Tyler DiPietro | September 28, 2006 8:34 PM
If atheism has to take the hit for Stalin, christianity gets the african slave trade, a centuries long killing spree with a death toll in the hundreds of millions, and the hundred years war, which killed a full third of the population of Europe.
The tamil situation is way, way more complicated than that glib little bit about "marxists in sri lanka" would suggest, too.
Posted by: Seth Manapio | September 30, 2006 12:27 AM
I have a certain sympathy for th argument that there is not a precise link between religion (specifically, Islam) and suicide bombing. At any given time, the practice of religion is an artefact of its social, political and historical context. The origins of islamicist suicide bombing were similar to the origins of militant islamicism as a significant force in the middle east: the Iranian regime. (Suicide bombing was an essential tool of an under-equipped Iranian military when faced with Iraqi armour).
Certainly, though, religion is a significant factor in the glorification of suicide bombing as something worthwile in itself, rather than a regretably necessary tactic.
I do have some qualms about Dawkins, though. I don't think he always makes his arguments with sufficient precision. He can't resist the temptation to taunt.
Posted by: Edward the Bonobo | October 4, 2006 9:17 AM