Now on ScienceBlogs: Oldest Human-Made Object in Space

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Search

Profile

Selva.jpg I am working on some very smart things to say here. Really. Meanwhile, there's this and this. Welcome.

Suggestions

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

RSS Feed

Archives

Creative Commons License

« Science Fiction Futures | Main | Ballet, behind all the grace... »

Sanity in Business

Category: Creative commons
Posted on: July 5, 2007 12:23 PM, by Selva

How Costco Became the Anti-Wal-Mart, NY Times

At Costco, one of Mr. Sinegal's[CEO of Costco] cardinal rules is that no branded item can be marked up by more than 14 percent, and no private-label item by more than 15 percent. In contrast, supermarkets generally mark up merchandise by 25 percent, and department stores by 50 percent or more.

"They could probably get more money for a lot of items they sell," said Ed Weller, a retailing analyst at ThinkEquity.

But Mr. Sinegal warned that if Costco increased markups to 16 or 18 percent, the company might slip down a dangerous slope and lose discipline in minimizing costs and prices.

Mr. Sinegal, whose father was a coal miner and steelworker, gave a simple explanation. "On Wall Street, they're in the business of making money between now and next Thursday," he said. "I don't say that with any bitterness, but we can't take that view. We want to build a company that will still be here 50 and 60 years from now."

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/44863

Comments

1

Amazing! A CEO who actually adopts an eastern philosophy to business.

There are a few of them out there. Once company in Delaware has a rule that once a plant gets to 150 people, a new plant HAS to open since it become increasingly ineffective to manage more than 150 people.

I'm thinking I might actually want to go get my MBA now.

Posted by: Tony P | July 5, 2007 2:53 PM

2

TSI, I wish to request your help with something. A British general has written about the "good" British administration of India.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/05/opinion/05rose.html?ex=1184385600&en=f051c0f2c9812f1f&ei=5070

"Pitt also passed the India Bill in 1784 — thus ensuring that the sort of poor administration that had soured relations with the American colonies would not be repeated in Britain’s other territories. (It also created the position of governor general in India, in which Cornwallis more than redeemed himself from his Yorktown disgrace.)"

I know about the Bengal famines and the Great Hedge, but I would like to have Indians' points of view on Cornwallis in India. If you have some sources, maybe you could put them here. Thank you.

Posted by: bernarda | July 8, 2007 8:00 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.