New-born twin giant pandas made their media debut at a zoo in Japan on Friday. The twins, one male and one female, were born on August 11 to mother Rauhin and father Eimei, by artificial insemination. (video via BBC News)
The Thoughtful Animal
exploring the evolution and architecture of the human mind
Search this Blog
Profile
I am a graduate student in Developmental Psychology at the University of Southern California.
I'm interested in the way that the environment interacts with biology in producing
innate or skilled behavior, and the evolution of the mind. For a sample of my best posts, see my Greatest Hits.
You can also follow me on twitter and check out my tumblr.
I am also Psychology and Neuroscience Editor for ResearchBlogging.org and Editor of Open Lab 2010
Check out the comment policy.
All written material on the site is the copyright of the author and may
not be reproduced or redistributed without permission.
Want blog schwag?
Recent Posts
- Not seeing any new posts? I'm at Scientific American Blogs!
- Goodbye Scienceblogs, Hello Scientific American Blogs!
- Monday Photoblogging: Before and After
- Google+ for the Blogger and Researcher
- Editor's Selections: Computer as Therapist, Nicotine and Body-Mass, and Another DSM-5 Proposal - Gambling Addiction
- Monday Photoblogging: Old LA Zoo
- From the Archives: What Can 3D Movies Teach Us About How Ants Smell?
- Editor's Selections: Social Hierarchies, ADHD and Athletics, and Pain in Fish
- Fido Might Not Know What You Do and Do Not See
- Editor's Selections: Methodology, Autistic Pigs, Invasive Brains, and OCD
Recent Comments
- Jason G. Goldman on Goodbye Scienceblogs, Hello Scientific American Blogs!
- Shecky R. on Goodbye Scienceblogs, Hello Scientific American Blogs!
- Jason G. Goldman on Goodbye Scienceblogs, Hello Scientific American Blogs!
- milli on Seeing Pigs Through Rose-Colored Glasses
- lost control on Goodbye Scienceblogs, Hello Scientific American Blogs!
- Ahcuah on Goodbye Scienceblogs, Hello Scientific American Blogs!
- Andrew G. on Goodbye Scienceblogs, Hello Scientific American Blogs!
- Kaltech Solutions on Monday Photoblogging: Before and After
- Enrique Gutierrez on Google+ for the Blogger and Researcher
- Joe H. on Google+ for the Blogger and Researcher
Categories
- Academia
- Animal Research Interviews
- Animals
- Ask A ScienceBlogger
- Book Reviews
- Communication
- Conflict & Cooperation
- Core Knowledge
- Culture
- Domestication
- Ethics in Research
- Genetics
- Human-Animal Relationship
- Monday Pets
- Neuroscience
- Psychological Science
- Quotations
- ResearchBlogging Editor's Selections
- Science Communication
- State of the Blog
Bloggie Things
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
Order of the Science Scouts of Exemplary Repute and Above Average Physique
Blogroll
-
Science Blogging
- All-Geo
- Animal Planet Blogs
- Ars Technica - Science
- Discover Blogs
- Discovery Blogs
- Elements
- everyONE blog (PLoS ONE)
- Field Of Science
- Genomes Unzipped
- KSJ Tracker
- Lab Spaces
- NASW News Blog
- National Geographic Blogs
- Nature Network Blogs
- NYTimes Blog – Dot Earth
- NYTimes Blog – Scientist at Work
- NYTimes Blog – Well
- Observatory – Columbia Journalism Review
- Panda's Thumb
- Psychology Today Blogs
- QUEST Community Science Blog
- Real Climate
- Research Blogging
- SciBlogs NZ
- Science 2.0
- Science Friday Blogs
- Science3point0
- Scienceblogs Brasil
- Scienceblogs Germany
- Scienceline blogs
- Scientific American – Bering in Mind
- Scientific American – Guest Blog
- Scientific American – Observations
- Scientopia
- Smithsonian Blogs
- Southern Fried Science Network
- The Guardian Science Blog
- The New Scientist Blogs
- WIRED Science
Archives
« Monday Pets on Scientific American! | Main | Editor's Selections: Katrina, Music, Crickets, and Artificial Movement »
Monday Midnight Movie - Baby Pandas!
Category: Giant Panda • Mammals
Posted on: September 6, 2010 11:59 PM, by Jason G. Goldman
Find more posts in: 
Life Science
Life ScienceTrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/146284
Comments
I have never seen a real panda before (does TV count?:P) but they are sooooo adorable!! Thanks for posting!
Posted by: 徵信社 | September 7, 2010 1:02 AM
Little head bangers aren't they!
Posted by: John | September 7, 2010 10:49 PM
I hate to bring this up, but feel I must. Why are zoos / scientists / nations spending MILLIONS of dollars to "save" a species that is doomed? The fact that they are CUTE is hardly a good excuse. Pandas are doomed because their diet is restricted to bamboo, which is piss-poor nutrition. They must eat 24 hours a day, and their reproduction rate is extremely poor. If we are going to dish out research and funds on the basis of cuteness, then only Paris Hilton, Hanna Montana, and Barbie dolls will survive.
Posted by: bo moore | September 8, 2010 9:42 AM
@3 Concern troll is concerned.
FYI, they weren't doomed until WE came along and doomed them, any more than any species is "doomed". That's why people are fighting to save them. Because it's our damn fault they're in the predicament they're in, and SOME of us are actually responsible enough to want to fix our mistakes instead of shrugging our shoulders and going "oh well!" like you are. Lazy, irresponsible humans like you make me wish I wasn't a member of this destructive, disgusting species.
Posted by: Tenebras | September 11, 2010 3:11 PM
I hate to bring this up, but feel I must. Why are zoos / scientists / nations spending MILLIONS of dollars to "save" a species that is doomed?
The question answers itself. If they are trying to save the species, they must think it can be saved, and hence, they must not agree with your omniscient pronouncement that the species is doomed. In fact, the evidence tends to support the opposite conclusion.
There are two general motivations for any type of environmental conservation. One is merely self-preservation - excessive damage to the common environment could impact physically on human life. The other is to some degree aesthetic - a desire to maintain aspects of the common environment which are seen as maginificent, scenic, etc. For me, both are valid motivations.
Having said that, both are also grounded in subjective evaluations. For example, someone who doesn't think that human life is of any value might not think that human self-preservation is of any value.
The fact that they are CUTE is hardly a good excuse.
Others do have the right to attempt to save any species they wish, for whatever motivation they may have.
Pandas are doomed because their diet is restricted to bamboo, which is piss-poor nutrition. They must eat 24 hours a day, and their reproduction rate is extremely poor.
However, pandas are not endangered mainly because of these particular traits, but rather, mainly because of human activity.
It is the height of silliness to anthropomorphize pandas and then criticize (or praise) them according to subjective human judgments about their diet or anything else. Having said that, although bamboo is not calorie-dense, it is extremely widely available. Pandas evolved adaptations that allow them to exploit one of the most prevelant resources in their natural environment.
If we are going to dish out research and funds on the basis of cuteness,
It is a valid point that humans may be inclined to excessively prioritize the well-being of other large mammalian species, or of bird species, when engaged in conservation. Having said that, these large species may sometimes be good barometers for the health of an ecosystem overall.
At the end of the day, it is not up to you whether others choose to attempt to preserve the panda species.
Posted by: harold
| September 13, 2010 5:40 PM
@3
Pandas invoke joy, hope, laughter, and love in ordinary human beings, especially children.
All ecological concerns aside, why would you say that allowing one of the most singly beloved species in the history of the world- right after cats and dogs and bunnies- to leave us forever, so that no-one will EVER see a panda again, is the ideal reaction?
Posted by: abadidea | September 17, 2010 8:11 PM