Official Comment Count: 1,031,302

Search this blog

Profile

attackeng.jpg Zuska is the kick-ass alter-ego of Suzanne E Franks. When not dispensing Zuska's wisdom, Suzanne can often be found gardening, reading, or having one of her thrice-weekly migraines.

Sb/DonorsChoose Drive


Thanks!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Other Information

19 Questions With Zuska

bob6.jpg

The place where I come from...is a small town. Coalfields of the Appalachian Mountains

bookcover.jpg

You will be wanting to read my excellent essay, 'Suzy the Computer' vs. 'Dr. Sexy': What's a Geek Girl to Do When She Wants to Get Laid? in She's Such a Geek! Women Write About Science, Technology, and Other Nerdy Stuff.

nwsa16.1

If you have not yet figured out why you shoud not be using terms like "hard science" and "soft skills", then you absolutely need to read Telling Stories About Engineering: Group Dynamics and Resistance to Diversity in NWSA Journal v. 16 No. 1, 2004 (Re)Gendering Science Fields.

fundbookcover.gif

You should also read They Blinded Me With Science: Misuse and Misunderstanding of Biological Theory, an excellent critique of Thornhill and Palmer's nonsense about rape as an evolutionary strategy. You can find it in Burack and Josephson's must-read tome, Fundamental Differences: Feminists Talk Back to Social Conservatives.

left_logo.gif

Support the Mautner Project for Lesbians With Cancer! "The Mautner Project improves the health of lesbians, bisexual, and transgender women who partner with women, and their families, through advocacy, education, research, and direct service. [The Mautner Project envisions] a healthcare system that is guided by social justice and responsive to the needs of all people."

Add to Technorati Favorites

Subscribe via Email

Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.

Sign me up!

« Math Confuses Princess: I Read It In Seed | Main | He's Got Nifty Banners! »

Another Take on Stupid Study

Category: Isn't It Ironic?Science in Bizarro LandWho Needs To Study Women?
Posted on: July 9, 2007 7:23 PM, by Zuska

Remember that fascinating study that almost certainly applied to females? Jake at Pure Pedantry has a very interesting analysis to offer on it.

I do like the way he deconstructs the statistics and delineates the difference between statistically significant and practically significant. However, he missed the boat on the gender issue. He, too, talks about eldest children, as if all children were male. This is very annoying.

I would really like it if people would be clear about when they are talking about research that was done only on men and research results that apply only to men. You know, if the same study were done on 240,000 adult women, nobody would be talking about "eldest children", I am willing to bet. Because, of course "women" does not equal "human" the way we seem to think "men" does. We don't tend to generalize from women to men, but we are perfectly happy to generalize from men to women.

Other than that, Jake's post is great. I agree with everything else he says, and he really did a fine job on the analysis. Do give it a read.

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Most German

Search All Blogs