Pseudonymous blogging - and commenting - is common. Some like it, some don't; some see the need for it, some don't. Whatever side you're on, you might be interested in these two recent columns from the Chronicle of Higher Education.
Thus Spake Zuska
A Blog For All and No One
Search this blog
Profile
Zuska is the kick-ass alter-ego of Suzanne E Franks. When not dispensing Zuska's wisdom, Suzanne can often be found gardening, reading, or having one of her thrice-weekly migraines.
Recent Posts
- Summer Vacations of My Youth
- Carpenter Technology: Litigation Forever, Cleanup Never
- This Just In: Feminism Is A Religion!
- Where I'm At
- Women With Their Sexy Hawt Bodies: How's A Man To Look Away?
- Call for September Scientiae
- Guide to Tenure for Black Academics
- Locking the Barn Door
- Complete Reader Survey, Win Fab Prizes
- Danica McKellar's New Book
Recent Comments
- Yttrai on Summer Vacations of My Youth
- Larry Ayers on Summer Vacations of My Youth
- Science Avenger on Women With Their Sexy Hawt Bodies: How's A Man To Look Away?
- Abi on This Just In: Feminism Is A Religion!
- Samia on Carpenter Technology: Litigation Forever, Cleanup Never
- Samia on Carpenter Technology: Litigation Forever, Cleanup Never
- Becca on This Just In: Feminism Is A Religion!
- Emily on This Just In: Feminism Is A Religion!
- mythago on This Just In: Feminism Is A Religion!
- MarkH on This Just In: Feminism Is A Religion!
Archives
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
Blogroll
- Sciencewomen
- Scientiae
- Women in Science
Other Information
The place where I come from...is a small town. Coalfields of the Appalachian Mountains
You will be wanting to read my excellent essay, 'Suzy the Computer' vs. 'Dr. Sexy': What's a Geek Girl to Do When She Wants to Get Laid? in She's Such a Geek! Women Write About Science, Technology, and Other Nerdy Stuff.
If you have not yet figured out why you shoud not be using terms like "hard science" and "soft skills", then you absolutely need to read Telling Stories About Engineering: Group Dynamics and Resistance to Diversity in NWSA Journal v. 16 No. 1, 2004 (Re)Gendering Science Fields.
You should also read They Blinded Me With Science: Misuse and Misunderstanding of Biological Theory, an excellent critique of Thornhill and Palmer's nonsense about rape as an evolutionary strategy. You can find it in Burack and Josephson's must-read tome, Fundamental Differences: Feminists Talk Back to Social Conservatives.

Support the Mautner Project for Lesbians With Cancer! "The Mautner Project improves the health of lesbians, bisexual, and transgender women who partner with women, and their families, through advocacy, education, research, and direct service. [The Mautner Project envisions] a healthcare system that is guided by social justice and responsive to the needs of all people."
Subscribe via Email
Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.
« Friday Bookshelf: Gardening For Life | Main | Links for 4-3-2008 »
Pseudonymous Writing: Two Views
Category: Daily Struggles • Linkfest • What They're Saying
Posted on: March 31, 2008 7:08 PM, by Zuska
Find more posts in:
Education & Careers
Comments
A very interesting topic.
I suppose if you are writing in your capacity as a professor, you really shouldn't be anon.
However, if you're "on your own time"...
I have reasons to remain (mostly) anonymous, which don't really involve my career advancement as much as privacy issues, but it's something I struggle with.
Posted by: PalMD | March 31, 2008 7:59 PM
I am admittedly quite paranoid but on occasion I even protect my pseudonym with a pseudonym. Why is that? Well two reasons really. The first is that there is plenty of evidence of implicit bias against women in science and it is more comfortable for me to know that people reading what I have to say are not subconsciously judging/dismissing what I say on the basis of my gender, so on occasions such as now when it is relevant to admit that my gender is female, I dont do it with my main pseudonym as that would wreck the effort I am trying to make to ensure that that speaker is on the masculine side of gender neutral. Secondly, I have a bitter and twisted history having been harassed out of my previous employment. I wanted to take legal action but in the end I couldnt afford it (that's one of the problems with being unemployed... And in the country I was employed in you cant find lawyers who will charge only as a proportion of any settlement they may win), and friends also finally convinced me that this could waste years of my life for very little gain. Growing up believing that "truth will out" and in "truth, justice and etc etc" and only learning in your late 30s (I was completely naive and a very slow learner) that this is a bunch of crap can tend to make one a bit bitter. However I dont want this experience to define me for the rest of my life and I dont believe it has to. I believe that I can contribute to the debate and let my past experience inform but not dominate my views. What I do think though is given the topics I choose to write on, my words are likely to have zero credibility if they are seen as the rantings of a bitter twisted ex-female scientist and egotistically, I do hope that I have some useful things to say. I too struggle with anonymity: part of the reason that I was harassed out of my previous employment is that I was not afraid to openly say what I think and to challenge unethical behavior directly. So I set a rule such that as long as I write things in such a way that not even my partner could identify who the author is, then I can allow myself to remain anonymous. This also helps (I hope) to minimize the bitter tone as well.
Posted by: pseudonymous inc | April 1, 2008 5:17 AM
I've been known to say that policy makes a poor substitute for sound judgment. To me the comments here and the explanations of the anonymous Chronicle authors reflect careful consideration of individual real-life concerns.
The other article struck me as very limited in its concepts of real-life consequences. I found it interesting that the real name advocate is described as a former academic and current art critic. Those two bits of information, attached to that particular essay, tell me far more than the author's real name.
I write anonymously online, for reasons that are important to me, personally. I'm also very, very conscious that the credibility of my online persona comes only from consistency of my online verbal behaviors. As a result, I'm much more careful about my choices of words in online writing than my everyday speech. (To the occasional detriment of my everyday life. Ouch!)
Posted by: etbnc | April 2, 2008 9:45 AM
Female Science Professor has blogged on the Chronicle articles, too; read what she has to say at http://science-professor.blogspot.com/2008/04/my-two-anonymous-cents.html
Posted by: Zuska | April 3, 2008 3:41 PM