Now on ScienceBlogs: The Laboratory at Harvard

Seed Media Group

Search

Profile

attackeng.jpg Zuska is the kick-ass alter-ego of Suzanne E Franks. When not dispensing Zuska's wisdom, Suzanne can often be found gardening, reading, or having one of her thrice-weekly migraines.

Sb/DonorsChoose Drive


Widget doesn't work? Here's my giving page. Thanks!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Other Information

19 Questions With Zuska

bob6.jpg

The place where I come from...is a small town. Coalfields of the Appalachian Mountains

bookcover.jpg

You will be wanting to read my excellent essay, 'Suzy the Computer' vs. 'Dr. Sexy': What's a Geek Girl to Do When She Wants to Get Laid? in She's Such a Geek! Women Write About Science, Technology, and Other Nerdy Stuff.

nwsa16.1

If you have not yet figured out why you shoud not be using terms like "hard science" and "soft skills", then you absolutely need to read Telling Stories About Engineering: Group Dynamics and Resistance to Diversity in NWSA Journal v. 16 No. 1, 2004 (Re)Gendering Science Fields.

fundbookcover.gif

You should also read They Blinded Me With Science: Misuse and Misunderstanding of Biological Theory, an excellent critique of Thornhill and Palmer's nonsense about rape as an evolutionary strategy. You can find it in Burack and Josephson's must-read tome, Fundamental Differences: Feminists Talk Back to Social Conservatives.

left_logo.gif

Support the Mautner Project for Lesbians With Cancer! "The Mautner Project improves the health of lesbians, bisexual, and transgender women who partner with women, and their families, through advocacy, education, research, and direct service. [The Mautner Project envisions] a healthcare system that is guided by social justice and responsive to the needs of all people."

Add to Technorati Favorites

« Physioprof at Feministe | Main | A Versatile Strategy »

Happy Anniversary, Seneca Falls!

Category: Feminist Foremothers
Posted on: July 20, 2008 11:20 PM, by Zuska

This weekend is the 160th anniversary of the first (US) women's rights convention at Seneca Falls, July 19 and 20, 1848. At Seneca Falls, Elizabeth Cady Stanton rewrote the Declaration of Independence as the Declaration of Women's Rights, beginning, of course, with "We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men and women are created equal..." And the Declaration included the shocking call for women's right to vote. It took 72 years till the right to vote was accomplished.

The final resolution in the Declaration called "for the overthrowing of the monopoly of the pulpit, and for the securing to woman equal participation with men in the various trades, professions and commerce." One hundred and sixty years later, and we're still working on that.

Of course, "all men and women" still really meant only "all (white) men and women", and the history of the fight for women's suffrage includes the sad fighting over whether priority ought to be given to "negro suffrage" or white women's suffrage, where "negro suffrage" meant the vote for black men. This was played out in what is known as the Kansas campaign of 1867, where the proposition to allow women to vote was actually put to ballot, but defeated. Abolitionists fighting for negro suffrage were at odds with women's suffrage workers who were willing to align themselves with those who supported their cause but opposed the vote for black men. From Alice Rossi's The Feminist Papers, quoting a woman in the middle of the Kansas campaign:

"So long as opposition to slavery is the only test for a free pass to your platform and membership of your association, and you do not shut out all persons opposed to woman suffrage, why should we not accept all in favor of woman suffrage to our platform and associations, even though they be rabid pro-slavery Democrats? Your test of unfaithfulness is the negro - ours is the woman; the broadest platform, to which no party has as yet risen, is humanity."

I can't help thinking of how this echoes down the years into the Democratic primary season just past. We've come so far, and have so far to go. We simply cannot allow our opponents - or ourselves - to fool us into thinking our hopes, dreams, and aspirations are at odds with one another, or must come at the cost of one another.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Enter to win

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM