Seed Media Group

Search this blog

Profile

attackeng.jpg Zuska is the kick-ass alter-ego of Suzanne E Franks. When not dispensing Zuska's wisdom, Suzanne can often be found gardening, reading, or having one of her thrice-weekly migraines.

Sb/DonorsChoose Drive


Thanks!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Other Information

19 Questions With Zuska

bob6.jpg

The place where I come from...is a small town. Coalfields of the Appalachian Mountains

bookcover.jpg

You will be wanting to read my excellent essay, 'Suzy the Computer' vs. 'Dr. Sexy': What's a Geek Girl to Do When She Wants to Get Laid? in She's Such a Geek! Women Write About Science, Technology, and Other Nerdy Stuff.

nwsa16.1

If you have not yet figured out why you shoud not be using terms like "hard science" and "soft skills", then you absolutely need to read Telling Stories About Engineering: Group Dynamics and Resistance to Diversity in NWSA Journal v. 16 No. 1, 2004 (Re)Gendering Science Fields.

fundbookcover.gif

You should also read They Blinded Me With Science: Misuse and Misunderstanding of Biological Theory, an excellent critique of Thornhill and Palmer's nonsense about rape as an evolutionary strategy. You can find it in Burack and Josephson's must-read tome, Fundamental Differences: Feminists Talk Back to Social Conservatives.

left_logo.gif

Support the Mautner Project for Lesbians With Cancer! "The Mautner Project improves the health of lesbians, bisexual, and transgender women who partner with women, and their families, through advocacy, education, research, and direct service. [The Mautner Project envisions] a healthcare system that is guided by social justice and responsive to the needs of all people."

Add to Technorati Favorites

Subscribe via Email

Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.

Sign me up!

« New Grant Program For White Forgetfulness | Main | Complete Reader Survey, Win Fab Prizes »

Danica McKellar's New Book

Category: GeekaliciousRole ModelsWhy Aren't You Reading This?
Posted on: August 7, 2008 10:12 PM, by Zuska

I never got around to reviewing Danica McKellar's first book, Math Doesn't Suck, and now she's got a second one out, Kiss My Math. You gotta love the title at least. I think she's got a whole franchise going here. Maybe by the time she puts out her calculus book I'll get my review of Math Doesn't Suck up on the blog.

Hat tip to Veronica for letting me know about this.

Comments

#1

I saw this on sale in the Atlanta airport a couple weeks back. I think it's great. Anyone who can write a successful pop-math book aimed at middle-schoolers has performed a genuine miracle.

Posted by: Matt Springer | August 8, 2008 3:02 AM

#2

Unfortunately her first book contained a bunch of "ou can so fulfill the patriarchal demands of femininity and do math" shit. Let us know about this one.

Posted by: PhysioProf | August 8, 2008 10:49 AM

#3

We had a 12 year old girl review "Math Doesn't Suck" http://www.fairerscience.org/fs-blogs/2007/09/math_doesnt_suck_a_review.html
and are planning to do the same with "Kiss My Math"

Pat

Posted by: Pat | August 9, 2008 12:51 PM

#4

From the preview I saw of it on the web, I expect it to be pretty much in the same vein as "Math Doesn't Suck!" I am of mixed feelings about this approach. The format is somewhat based on teen fashion mags, which aren't particularly empowering literary models. It would appeal to a certain segment of girls, and draw them in to math when they might not otherwise be so engaged. But it doesn't do anything to support the girls who are interested in math and who don't buy into the typical obsession with clothes, makeup, boys that girls are expected to cultivate. You could argue that this isn't the book McKellar set out to write, and you just have to take the one she did write and evaluate it as it is. The review that Pat cites above is unabashedly positive and we can't discount that evidence. Perhaps my favorite part of that review is this line:

McKellar uses examples that everyone can relate to, like how much a dress costs if it was originally $60 and is now 20% off.

I have to confess I do like the idea of centering the female perspective in that way, as something "everyone" can relate to. Goodbye to all those male-centered math word problems!

Posted by: Zuska | August 13, 2008 10:28 PM

#5

Isn't the whole point of math education, and what makes certain species of feminist criticism of word problems irrelevant, the fact that you are supposed to be able to disregard extraneous information in the question "Tina is buying dresses. If each dress is $150, she buys five dresses and brought $800 dollars with her, will she have enough to but that sweet Armani bag on the bargain rack for $60?" I mean, you don't translate that into "Tina + dress = pretty," you are figuring out how much she needs.

HJ

Posted by: Bing | August 20, 2008 12:50 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Readers' Picks

Search All Blogs