Alex Palazzo is a postdoctoral fellow working in the Department of Cell Biology at Harvard Medical School.
Cell Biology Blogs
Non-Sb Science Blogs
1 Degree of Separation
Misc. Blogs
Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.
« No comment | Main | Nomenclature »
Category: Pure Biology
Posted on: August 16, 2006 6:58 PM, by Alex Palazzo
(in the best possible way)
I'm scanning through Science when BAM:
He's imaging RNA polymerase as it transcribes DNA .... nucleotide by freakin' nucleotide ... it's sequencing at the individual molecule level.
(To all those thinking about the future of biology and day dreaming of "big biology", this is where it's at ... single molecule enzymology.)
Send this entry to:
Email this entry to a friend
View the Technorati Link Cosmos for this entry
(TrackBack URL for this entry: )
YES! Send me a free issue of Seed.
If I like what I see, I'll receive 5 more issues (6 in all) for just $14.95. That's 50% off the cover price! If I'm not completely satisfied, I'll simply write "cancel" on the invoice and owe nothing. The free issue is mine to keep.
(Non-U.S. subscribers, click here.)
Comments
Why you do you always make the big/small biology an either/or debate? You'd be hard pressed to argue that "big biology" projects haven't produced some outstanding results (Human Genome Project anyone?) There's also plenty of evidence that suggests that the two approaches complement each other in all kinds of useful ways.
Why don't we all just get along and focus on the real issue facing science: How to get more funding and get more mileage out of the funding we have?
Posted by: Chris | August 16, 2006 7:32 PM
alright, yeah, that's pretty damn cool. but I don't understand the anti-big biology thing. if that gets scaled up and widely used, it would be "big", no?
and while the future of biology might be in that technology, it might also be in technologies like this one, which is excellent "big biology" (though microarrays as well started "little"). the difference between big and little is smaller than you think.
Posted by: JP | August 16, 2006 9:56 PM
I guess I hit a nerve. No more gratuitous Big Biology bashing, I promise (and you used a DB paper to bat me down, tsk tsk). Let me paste a comment I left at evolgen:
Posted by: apalazzo | August 16, 2006 11:23 PM