Now on ScienceBlogs: Charles Darwin February 12, 1809 - April 19, 1882

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Transcription and Translation

From the bench top to the public square.

transcription.jpg

Search

Profile


me3.jpg
Alex Palazzo is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Biochemistry at The University of Toronto.


follow ribonucleicacid at http://twitter.com

Recent Posts


Recent Comments

  • Abdelhakim moutabarrik: Je veux calculer mon h index read more
  • http://www.howtobebetterinbed.org/: • Require a walk soon after your diet. read more
  • Sandoval23Regina: Do you know that it is the best time to read more
  • Francois Berthoux: I want to calculate my h index; i am in read more
  • Francois Berthoux: I want to calculate my h index; i am in read more
  • mary: Can't resist: I have 15 papers and the least cited read more
  • Novella Comins: Babaganoosh here and this was such a treat, boost out read more
  • Annoyed: Shocked: I don't think Landecker was insulting, just pointing out read more
  • cugel: Why is Keith Yamamoto overlooked when their are discussions of read more
  • Simon: Hello, I wanted to tell you about an plugin to read more

Archives

Links

Extras

Locations of visitors to this page

« How proteins cross the Nuclear Pore Complex | Main | Short List for Larry Summers' Replacement »

H-Index + Google = Scientific Rankings Gone Crazy

Category: Lab Life
Posted on: December 4, 2006 4:10 PM, by Alex Palazzo

The H-index was the brainchild of Jorge Hirsch. It's a method to quantify a researchers impact. (To read more on this, check this entry of mine: What's your h-index.)

I was just alerted that Michael Schwartzbach has written a program that can calculate your very own h-index quickly over the web by hacking into Google Scholar. I tried using it to get mine ... unfortunately "A Palazzo", is not unique and so I couldn't recalculate my own h-index. I finally got it to work by typing "A Palazzo" and Columbia and got 8 (the value I had the last time I checked). Go visit Epidemiologic Inquiry to use this neat web feature.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

Comments

1

The calculator isn't very good. It gave me a h of 9; I was pretty depressed, until I used the Web of Science directly, and found the actual number was 23.

Posted by: Gerard Harbison | December 4, 2006 4:46 PM

2

How did you calculate it from Web of Science? the H-index is not as easy to determine manually as you think. It is from a natural equilibrium maximization function between total number of papers and the average number of citations over a large number of publications. One cannot just eye-ball it quickly.

One should read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H-index to learn more.

I've run famous and low-ranking scientists and the feature seems to work okay. Try using your full name and middle initial- that works better than first initial. If one has worked/researched at multiple schools, it might be good to put both university names and departments in quotes, joined by an "OR".

Posted by: Eric | December 4, 2006 5:11 PM

3

An H-index value of 9 is actually rather high for a beginning scientist. you should be proud.

In epidemiology at least, while top scientists have H-index of >90, associate and assistant professors usually only have an H-index of 10 to 30. There are also full professors at harvard who have H-index of only 16 (though full profs generally average 40 or more in medicine).

Posted by: Epidemiologic Inquiry | December 4, 2006 5:35 PM

4

Use web of science to pull up all your papers.

http://apps.isiknowledge.com/WoS/CIW.cgi?SID=E1aHKhlIeIkFaJllEN@&Func=CallAuthorFinder

If you have a unique name+initials this is easy. If not, you have to sort a bit by institution. Then use the same web page to rank them by citation. Page down the rank until you come to the last paper whose number of citations is greater than its rank.

Posted by: Gerard Harbison | December 4, 2006 6:30 PM

5
How did you calculate it from Web of Science?
When you make a general search in web of knowledge you will get a list of publications. On the right side of the results page you will find a link to: "Citation Report". If you click it you will be led to a page where the h-ndex is displayed in the upper right corner. (I hope this works from any location and is not a special feature of our institution's ISI license.) The results are much more reliable compared to the link in your post, especially if you have a quite common name. If you were "Smith" additional information (like affilation) would't help much even in ISI. Then you'll have to mark all the papers that are actually yours which may be quite time consuming. The competing database Scopus is trying to overcome this issue by adressing all authors with unique identifiers. Unfortunately, I was listed in the scopus database under several identifiers and they will only change it when the author sends them a list of all his publications.

Posted by: sparc | December 4, 2006 10:55 PM

6

BTW, the depth of calculating the h-index in ISI web of knowledge depends on the license your institution owns. Ours is limited to the years past 1996. Thus, if you published something before you should contact a colleague who has access to a full license covvering all years.

Posted by: sparc | December 4, 2006 10:58 PM

7

"I was just alerted that Michael Schwartzbach has written a program that can calculate your very own h-index quickly over the web by hacking into Google Scholar. "

Well, so long as it's not keeping him from important stuff like proof-reading my masters' thesis ...

Posted by: csrster | December 5, 2006 5:47 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.