Now on ScienceBlogs: Oldest Human-Made Object in Space

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Transcription and Translation

From the bench top to the public square.

transcription.jpg

Search

Profile


me3.jpg
Alex Palazzo is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Biochemistry at The University of Toronto.


follow ribonucleicacid at http://twitter.com

Recent Posts


Recent Comments

  • Abdelhakim moutabarrik: Je veux calculer mon h index read more
  • http://www.howtobebetterinbed.org/: • Require a walk soon after your diet. read more
  • Sandoval23Regina: Do you know that it is the best time to read more
  • Francois Berthoux: I want to calculate my h index; i am in read more
  • Francois Berthoux: I want to calculate my h index; i am in read more
  • mary: Can't resist: I have 15 papers and the least cited read more
  • Novella Comins: Babaganoosh here and this was such a treat, boost out read more
  • Annoyed: Shocked: I don't think Landecker was insulting, just pointing out read more
  • cugel: Why is Keith Yamamoto overlooked when their are discussions of read more
  • Simon: Hello, I wanted to tell you about an plugin to read more

Archives

Links

Extras

Locations of visitors to this page

« Update | Main | Montreal Seminar »

Cranks Sowing the Seeds of Doubt

Category: Science & Society
Posted on: April 20, 2008 12:16 PM, by Alex Palazzo

They announced rain today - instead it is sunny, warm and ... a perfect distraction. Since I haven't yet decamped for lab and am waiting for my wife to shower so that we can have a short picnic by the river before i head out to work, I'll just leave you a few links to some VERY interesting and insightful articles in Slate.The three part series was written by Daniel Engber and focus on how certain elements of our society (i.e. climate skeptics, the ID movement, and the tobacco industry) have cultivated this notion of super-skepticism in an attempt o discredit current scientific consensus.

The idea is that these elements attempt to cast a wee bit of doubt and then illogically deduce that the whole structure of scientific research is corrupt. As mentioned in yesterday's Science Saturday, this pattern of thought resembles that of conspiracy theorists. A must read.

The Paranoid Style in American Science
Part I: A Crank's Progress
Part II: An Uncertain Truth
Part III: Contrary Imaginations

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.