Now on ScienceBlogs: Skloot Launching FAQ Blog Series Answering Reader Questions About The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks

Transcription and Translation

From the bench top to the public square.

transcription.jpg

Search

Profile


me3.jpg
Alex Palazzo is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Biochemistry at The University of Toronto.


follow ribonucleicacid at http://twitter.com

Recent Posts


Recent Comments

  • Rob Monkey: MP: "It is a matter of axioms a) I believe read more
  • Jim Thomerson: At 42, I was a well situated Full Professor. However, read more
  • www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000403466720: The SMART-grant would be the most stupid thing ever invented. read more
  • sikiş: Part of the discussion there focuses on how to increase read more
  • Hendrian: your wife is asian? She's cute. read more
  • OSHA 10 30 Hour Training: @OSHAPro While it may be true that more and more read more
  • Comrade PhysioProf: Dude, how fucking stupid do you think we are? That's read more
  • Alex Palazzo: Hendrian, Yes, science may have adopted theories that were later read more
  • Hendrian: Thanks for your response Alex. I may be wrong, but read more
  • Alex Palazzo: MP, I along with most people approach the world issue read more

Archives

Links

Extras

Locations of visitors to this page

« The Trip Part IV - Bavaria | Main | Notes from Kindergarten »

Science career as a video game?

Category: Lab Life
Posted on: July 16, 2008 8:41 AM, by Alex Palazzo

Inspired by a conversation with Awesome Mike.

Your science career, what type of video game is it? At times it might resemble a labyrinth full of demons that you must slay. (Or maybe it's like Grand Theft Auto? Well since I've never played that game nor Halo, I'll stick to the metaphorical game that's running through my head.)

Level 1: Undergraduate

The first level is the easiest. Stay focused and you'll get to the end. Final monster at the end of the round? Those exam finals? Psht.

Level 2: Grad Student

This level bit trickier then the previous one. The first major obstacle is choosing the right lab. Pick a postdoc laden lab full of premadonas and you may end up loosing many bonus lives unnecessarily to all sorts of nasty creatures hiding in each corner. Pick a lab where the work is interesting and where you'll receive a good training and you may gain valuable extra powers that can be useful in higher levels. The last dragon to slay in this level is the thesis. In many ways this is the hardest part of this level but in no way near the most challenging.

Level 3: Postdoctoral fellow

In comparison to the previous level, the choice of lab is even more critical. You want a good environment with good connections that has a history of postdocs moving on to the next level. You also want to have a project that you can bring with you. The final dragon to slay at the end of the round? Surviving the eighteen headed monster that is the job market for academia. Unlike in the previous level this monster is brutal. But if you've laid down the proper ground work and have an interesting (and findable) research plan, you'll slay this monster (hopefully).

I am in the process of slaying the multi headed dragon. (Yes this post is a hint as to what's been happening in my science life besides travelling across Europe). But level 3 is as far as I've reached in this game. You can fill me in as to what is to come in the next. But I can imagine ... Level 4: Assistant Professor, Level 5: Full Professor and Level 6 ... Grand Poobah?

Comments

1

I think a better video game comparison for most of grad school would be the concept of "grinding":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grind_(gaming)
Grinding is a term used in computer gaming to describe the process of engaging in repetitive and/or non-entertaining gameplay in order to gain access to other features within the game.

Tens of thousands of minipreps later, this seems appropriate.

Posted by: David Crotty | July 16, 2008 11:25 AM

2

OK, this isn't a video game, but works along a similar line:

My grad school labmates and I thought that it might be interesting to have a reality show that pitted two laboratories against each other. Toss out an interesting question and give the two laboratories a certain amount of time (probably an inordinate amount of time on reality-show-based timelines) and examine how each laboratory tackled the question. Obviously a lab with a biophysics bent would approach it differently than one with an emphasis on structure (or whatever). Not really sure how we'd determine who "won".

Something tells me the Discovery channel won't be calling anytime soon....

Posted by: MicroTUBEules | July 17, 2008 12:46 PM

3

Like in any game (or job search, for that metaphor), you can't win if you don't play.

Keep at it, one bit of writing, one application at a time.

Posted by: gwc | July 17, 2008 2:51 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Collective Imagination
Enter to win the daily giveaway
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.