Now on ScienceBlogs: The significance of 2/13

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Transcription and Translation

From the bench top to the public square.

transcription.jpg

Search

Profile


me3.jpg
Alex Palazzo is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Biochemistry at The University of Toronto.


follow ribonucleicacid at http://twitter.com

Recent Posts


Recent Comments

  • Abdelhakim moutabarrik: Je veux calculer mon h index read more
  • http://www.howtobebetterinbed.org/: • Require a walk soon after your diet. read more
  • Sandoval23Regina: Do you know that it is the best time to read more
  • Francois Berthoux: I want to calculate my h index; i am in read more
  • Francois Berthoux: I want to calculate my h index; i am in read more
  • mary: Can't resist: I have 15 papers and the least cited read more
  • Novella Comins: Babaganoosh here and this was such a treat, boost out read more
  • Annoyed: Shocked: I don't think Landecker was insulting, just pointing out read more
  • cugel: Why is Keith Yamamoto overlooked when their are discussions of read more
  • Simon: Hello, I wanted to tell you about an plugin to read more

Archives

Links

Extras

Locations of visitors to this page

« Lou Dobbs understands the problem, but not the answer | Main | The Deed is Done »

The Stimulus - How much is marked for science funding?

Category: Lab LifeScience & Society
Posted on: January 29, 2009 9:10 AM, by Alex Palazzo

From the AAAS:

The three agencies highlighted in the America COMPETES Act of 2007 and President Bush's American Competitiveness Initiative (ACI) would do extremely well in the stimulus appropriations bill. The National Science Foundation (NSF) would receive $3.0 billion; the Department of Energy's Office of Science (DOE OS) would receive $2.0 billion; and Commerce's National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) would receive $520 million; nearly all of these supplementals are for R&D activities. The $5.5 billion allocated to these three agencies would finally put all three budgets on track to double over the next 7 to 10 years as envisioned in the ACI, America COMPETES, and Obama campaign promises.

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) would receive $3.9 billion in the stimulus appropriations bill, divided roughly evenly between research and infrastructure (construction and maintenance of facilities). The stimulus funding would turn around a NIH budget that has been in decline since 2004. The Department of Energy's (DOE) energy programs would also be a winner with $2.0 billion for R&D and related activities in renewable energy and energy conservation, with billions more for DOE in weatherization, loan guarantee, and clean energy demonstration funds. And the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) would receive $600 million, mostly for R&D.

Let's not mess things up this time! The last major increase to the NIH caused major problems years later. Money was simply pumped into new and existing grants, PIs hired many new grad students and postdocs, and the pyramid scheme got a major influx bloating the bottom of the academic edifice. As the bottom rose, many chunks fell of and as one Nobel Lauriate stated, we sacrificed a generation of scientists.

So what to do? President Obama has stated that we should "triple the number of fellowships in science to help spur the next generation of innovation". But as I pointed out yesterday, NIH funded labs must also change the way postdocs are treated. This can be done quite simply by


  • Increasing the wage guidlines issued by the NIH

  • Increasing funding for career postdocs

Let's see what happens.

(ht: Andrea D'Ambrogio)

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: PoliticsEducation & Careers

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.