Transcription and Translation

Now where was I ... in any case, you get the picture. There is very little time for the blog. And even less time for reading other blogs. In fact Friday I am giving a Rapoport lab journal club and I need to get ready.

So in short I am considering whether to ditch the blog, or at the very least leave Scienceblogs. I had the privilege to be one of the first bloggers here. Over the years, I've tried to convey the many joys and hardships that accompanies the life of a scientist. I was reminded of many of these old posts this past weekend. We were up in Montreal visiting my big fat Italian family. At one gathering, I sat down next to my fathers siblings and talk drifted to my work and what exactly I do. I explained to them that I was a basic scientist. If my field was literature, then I studied the letter "D". But they insisted that I must be working on some disease or some practical problem. I responded that if Cancer was a Shakespearean play, you would never be able to understand it if you didn't have a working knowledge of the alphabet. I studied the very base of our biological knowledge, I study the ABCs of life. My work indirectly affects all of these higher order problems such as cancer, diabetes, Alzheimer's ...

As time has gone on my blog has become less personal, as my writing drifted more and more towards new developments within cell and molecular biology, and on political affairs (although these have always been from the vantage point of a postdoc operating within the scientific establishment). But I would like to get back to where my blog once was, writing about the "scientific life" itself, writing about the nature of scientific thought. Most people are in awe of scientific developments, scientists are some of the most trusted segments of society, but science is often treated like a mystery, a Byzantine edifice of facts, or worse like some religion that issues dogmatic view of the world around us. These views display not only a fundamental ignorance as to how science actually works, but a simplistic view of the very nature of knowledge and ideas. I would like to try to explain the very mechanisms of science.

I have been reading a book recently, Everyday Practice of Science, where Intuition and Passion Meet Objectivity and Logic, which has rekindled this urge to explain how scientific theories are created, what is the nature of knowledge, and how do humans use ideas to understand the world around them. I'll have more to say about this book in future posts (I hope), but for now I'll just recommend it to any one who really wants o understand exactly how science works.