I'm teaching about opponent processes in color vision today and thought I'd share one of my favorite examples. This is how you use the human visual system to turn a black and white photo into color. Try it out:
Of Two Minds
Two neuroscience bloggers team up for one chimeric blog, and world domination of course.
The Minds
Shelley Batts is a Neuroscience PhD candidate at the University of Michigan. She studies hair cell regeneration in the cochlea, and is trying to finish that quixotic quest called 'thesis.' She lies awake at night pondering how science intersects with politics, culture, policy, money, medicine, and religion in an attempt to be more than just a niche scientist sitting in the oh-so-lovely ivory tower. Follow me and my parrot, Pepper, on our quest to finish my PhD, land a post-doc, and stay sane.
The Omnibrain is a psychology graduate student at an online university. He hopes that the three weeks and $29.95 that he is spending on his Ph.D. will get him a job at a Tier 1 research university. Do online universities have postdocs? Ok...just kidding, he is really a Ph.D. Candidate in Psychology studying high level vision. You know... stuff like scene & object perception.
While not an official contributer to 'Of Two Minds,' Shelley's sidekick is an African Grey parrot named Pepper. His heros are Irene Pepperberg, Alex, and Rachel Carson. He spends his time learning Mandarin and writing the Great American novel.
"Those who dwell, as scientists or laymen, among the beauties and mysteries of the earth, are never alone or weary of life." ~Rachel Carson
Search
Recent Posts
- Color after image demonstration - Seeing color when there is none.
- The difference between objects and scenes... random thoughts
- Is it me or is the Swine Flu waaay overrated? A case of the Availability Heuristic.
- How to tell if you have swine flu
- More thoughts on student blogging in class
- Using science to kill people
- Blogging for University Honors Credit. A Success - I think.
- Grad students on spring break
- XKCD certainly got this one right on the nose... reporting the data the right way makes a HUGE difference!
- Obama doesn't hate the Special Olympics he hates retarded people
Recent Comments
- Tsutsugamushi on Is it me or is the Swine Flu waaay overrated? A case of the Availability Heuristic.
- Thong tin ngan hang on Encephalon Goes to Paris (Hilton)
- JakeR on Color after image demonstration - Seeing color when there is none.
- Marc on Color after image demonstration - Seeing color when there is none.
- Tiffany on I told you so... Brain Games suck
- nuoc hoa on Encephalon Goes to Paris (Hilton)
- porno izle on The difference between objects and scenes... random thoughts
- Llewellyn Kriel on Color after image demonstration - Seeing color when there is none.
- dennis on The difference between objects and scenes... random thoughts
- sinema izle on I told you so... Brain Games suck
Archives
- July 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
Links
- Promenade 'Round the Cochlea
- University of Michigan
- UM Neuroscience
- New College of Florida
- NPR
- Nature
- The New Shelton Wet/Dry
- Creative Commons
- The Science Creative Quarterly
- Church of the FSM
- The Blog Herald
- The Hedonistic Imperative
- Anthropic Principle
- African Grey Parrot Research by Dr. Pepperberg
- Get Some Scholarships
- OmniNerd
Blogroll
- Mind Hacks
- 3QuarksDaily
- Drug Rep Toys Blog
- Amused Muse
- Perfectly Reasonable Deviations
- ProScience
- Musings of a Dinosaur
- Chip's Quips
- PharmaGossip
- AgnosticOracle
- Too Many Tribbles
- LabLemming Lounge
- UDreamofJanie
- Wired Science Blog
- The Flying Trilobite
- Digital Cuttlefish
- A Good Poop
- Ectoplasmosis
- Laelaps
- McBlawg
- Drugmonkey
- Skeptical Alchemist
- Pondering Pikaia
- Tangled Up in Blue
- Action Potential
- The Big Room
- Inalieneable Rights
- The Indigestible
- Blogging the Singularity
- Direct Neural Interface
- Ouroboros
- Tantalus Prime
- HENRY: Human Evolution News Relay
- DeSmogBlog
- Distributed Neuron
- Angry By Choice
- Brain in a Vat
- Addiction Inbox
- Tabsir
- The Shape of Days
- Bug Girl's Blog
- Cognition and Language Lab
- Olduvai George
- Decrepit Old Fool
- Acephelous
- Archy
- Cynical-C
- Blog of the Gods
- BoingBoing
- Neatorama
- Pajamas Media
- Mental Floss
- Pop Candy
- Neatorama
- Smart Mobs
- Andrew Sullivan's The Atlantic
- BlogHer
- Panda's Thumb
- DeadPopStar
- Majikthise
- Wheatdogg
- Cosmic Variance
- Dispatches From the Culture Wars
- The Loom by Carl Zimmer
- Stranger Fruit
- Afarensis
- Republic of T
- Appletree Blog
- Scientific Activist
- Scientific American Blog
- Pharyngula
- Terra Sigillata
- Neurotopia
- Bootstrap Analysis
- Jon's Travel Adventures
- Thoughts From Kansas
- Neuroethics and Law
- Shrimp and Grits
- The Last Psychiatrist
- Rev. Big Dumb Chimp
- Gene Expression
- Dr. Bushwell's Chimp Refuge
- Lab Cat
- Agnostic Monk
- Harper Valley Humor
- Respectful Insolence
- Butterflies and Wheels
- Supernovas
- Sharp Brains
- A Blog Around the Clock
- The Anterior Commissure
- Cerebrum: The Dana Forum on Brain Science
- Channel N
- Cognitive Daily
- Developing Intelligence
- The Frontal Cortex
- Improbable Research
- Milligram
- Mind Hacks
- Mixing Memory
- The Neurocritic
- Neurophilosophy
- Phineas Gage Fan Club
- PsyBlog
- Pure Pedantry
- Sequitur
- Shrink Rap
- Tierney Lab
- World of Psychology
Commenter Policy
We love constructive comments! However, we reserve the right to delete comments that abuse this forum. Voicing your opinions is great, just be respectful.
Other Information
« The difference between objects and scenes... random thoughts | Main
Color after image demonstration - Seeing color when there is none.
Category: Psychology • Vision
Posted on: July 1, 2009 11:29 AM, by The Omnibrain
Find more posts in:
Brain & Behavior
Life Science
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/113920









Comments
Very interesting.
I learned about opponent color processing in a nice little paper by neurophilosopher Paul Churchland named "Chimerical Colors", where he shows that the phenomenal color-space (the hue-circle with the added light-dark axis) is isomorphic to the output-space of the Hurvich-Jameson model for color-processing, thus allowing an ontological reduction of color-qualia to visual processing in an HJ-network. He even provided examples of "chimerical colors" where you look at a certain color, and then, instead of looking at a neutral background, look at a background of a certain (different) color, thus producing impressions of colors that we could not otherwise see. Very interesting - and impressive.
One thing that has been bugging me, though - why do negatives of images always look like they have a far narrower color-range than the corresponding positive? Perhaps someone here can enlighten me.
Posted by: MPhil | July 1, 2009 1:55 PM
The apparent narrow color-range of a negative image is due to the dynamic range of the cone receptors in the retina. The three cone receptor types we have are differentially activated by a given color scene (the Wikipedia entry on color vision has a decent write-up of this). A negative of a given color scene has a very different set of wavelengths, many of which fall outside the dynamic range of human color vision of around 425nm-625nm.
On another note, one thing that’s always impressed me is how each cone type has a nearly perfect tiling across the retina, irrespective of the other cone types.
Posted by: Dan Clark | July 2, 2009 2:31 PM
Very cool! As the video is loading, I concentrate on the dot in the center of the image. When the image shifts to B&W, I can see the narrow color range, but I note that when I shift my focus off the center point, the colors go away, but return once I go back to the center. Is that an expected outcome?
Posted by: The skepTick | July 6, 2009 3:48 PM
good,
ı concentrate on the center the image, ı see color range.
it's very interesting. Thank you
Posted by: Psikolog Uğur DALAN | July 10, 2009 5:18 AM
This doesn't work very well for me. When the image shifts, I think I may imagine a slight hint of colour, but when I acutally look at the image, it is black and white.
Posted by: Marcia | July 10, 2009 12:14 PM
Thank you. but ı actually look at the B&W image.
Çocuk Psikolojisi
Posted by: çocuk psikolojisi | July 11, 2009 1:14 PM
I wonder why it works for some people but not others.
To see an afterimage, I have to stare at an extremely bright light. A video on a computer screen in normal room lighting isn't going to do it for me.
Posted by: Marcia | July 20, 2009 7:37 AM
What happened to Shelley Batts? Is she married now? She never writes in this blog any more. How is she doing?
Posted by: William Petersen | July 21, 2009 9:29 PM
I'm sorry, but I missed this entirely. All I saw was a black and white image - what else was I supposed to see?
Posted by: Llewellyn Kriel | August 22, 2009 2:30 PM
Great blog! This video is now on my bookmark list and I've had a great time reading all your posts.
Good luck with your PhD thesis.
Posted by: Marc | September 26, 2009 7:53 PM
How does your research accommodate Edwin H. Land's two-color representations (retinex theory), as opposed to standard three-color representations?
Posted by: JakeR | September 29, 2009 12:31 AM