Seed Media Group

A Vote For Science

Science Policy and Debate in the 2008 Presidential Election

Search this blog

Profile

sblogo-50.jpg With less than two months left before the next U.S. president is elected, ScienceBlogs wanted to dedicate a space to campaign politics. A Vote For Science is a group blog that will focus on the candidates' science policies. It is managed by many interested ScienceBloggers, as well as guest blogger Ivan Oelrich of the Federation of American Scientists.

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

SHARP

The Scientists and Engineers for America's SHARP network allows you to click on the map to see where your candidates stand on important science issues.

map.jpg

« Obama releases detailed plan for science. | Main | Live blogging the debate »

Questions for the debate

Category: National and Homeland Security
Posted on: September 26, 2008 3:24 PM, by Michael Stebbins

FYI for everyone. John McCain has recanted his offer not to campaign and postpone the debate tonight. In other words, GAME ON! Tonight's debate is going to focus on foreign policy and national security. Will they discuss some of the big issues that never get discussed in the foreign policy debates.

Here are some questions that me and my colleagues at the Federation of American Scientists came up with earlier this year...

The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty would ban all nuclear explosions for military or civilian purposes. The United States signed the treaty in 1996, but the Senate rejected ratification in 1999. Would you make it a priority of your administration to ratify the treaty?

The United States currently has nuclear-armed missiles deployed on high alert, much as it did during the Cold War. Will you make it a priority of your administration to work with foreign leaders to take all nuclear weapons off alert?

The Bush administration has been accused of undermining the integrity of government scientific findings to suit political agendas. Whether you believe this to be the case or not, what will you do to ensure that political appointees do not manipulate scientific findings or their dissemination for political purposes?

There is now ample evidence of billions of dollars in wasteful spending and fraud at the Defense Department, often through unscrupulous or sloppy contractor practices. What specifically will you do to control such waste?

Congress annually waives the legal requirement that the Defense Department balance its books and provide an accounting of defense spending. This is the only federal agency not required to do so. Will you prioritize ending the practice of waiving this obligation and increase transparency of defense spending?

The United States has reduced its nuclear weapons arsenal since the Cold War but still plans to retain thousands of these weapons indefinitely and is not pursuing the total elimination of nuclear weapons worldwide. Are you committed to total nuclear disarmament, and what goals will your administration set for engaging the other nuclear-weapon states to reduce the number and role of nuclear weapons?

The Bush administration has proposed resuming industrial-scale production of new nuclear weapons under the Reliable Replacement Warhead Program. Will you continue this program?

The United States is ill-prepared for any large public health emergency. What specifically would your administration do to prepare the country for naturally occurring public health emergencies and deliberate biological threats?

The United States, Russia, and China have all tested space weapons designed to shoot down satellites. What specifically will you do to ensure the protection of space assets and prevent the development and deployment of antisatellite weapons?

More broadly, what would you do to prevent an escalation of military competition between the United States and China?

Comments

Presidential debate 2008 watch easy ONLINE.
http://tubedirect.net/index.php?q=Presidential-debate2008-ONLINE
Fast downloading and hight quality on service

Posted by: herlu | September 26, 2008 5:00 PM

Do you think it's realistic and possible to pursue total elimination of nuclear weapons worldwide? I would think that an absolute disarmament would put our country in danger, or at least at a powerful disadvantage both politically and militarily, to other countries who would either refuse to give up all of their nuclear weapons or who would seek to make new ones.

Posted by: Keith | September 26, 2008 5:09 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Most German

Search All Blogs

Science News From:

Science News from NYTimes.com