..appear to be shifting toward ~475 nm.
A Vote For Science
Science Policy and Debate in the 2008 Presidential Election
Profile
With less than two months left before the next U.S. president is elected, ScienceBlogs wanted to dedicate a space to campaign politics. A Vote For Science is a group blog that will focus on the candidates' science policies. It is managed by many interested ScienceBloggers, as well as guest blogger Ivan Oelrich of the Federation of American Scientists.
Search
Recent Posts
- Obama to undo Bush anti-science policies
- Results for State Ballot Measures on Science
- Happy Election Day! GO VOTE!
- Our First AVoteForScience Couple!
- Massive number of OpEds endorsing Obama because of policies on science
- Nobel Laureate, Murray Gell-Mann endorses Obama
- 76 Nobel Laureates in Science Endorse Obama!
- More AVoteForScience videos!
- Kiki Sanford endorses Barack Obama
- Physicist Larry Jackel discusses loss of innovation in US and endorses Obama
Recent Comments
- Fertility Calculator on Francis Collins, former head of the Human Genome Project, endorses Obama
- Nokia Mobile on Obama to undo Bush anti-science policies
- Cameras on All 2008 US Nobel Laureates in Science Endorse Obama!
- phen375 on Results for State Ballot Measures on Science
- wartrol on Results for State Ballot Measures on Science
- bubble shooter on Massive number of OpEds endorsing Obama because of policies on science
- Tőzsde on Massive number of OpEds endorsing Obama because of policies on science
- v-pills on 61 Nobel Laureates in Science Endorse Obama
- african mango on 61 Nobel Laureates in Science Endorse Obama
- erdic63 on Results for State Ballot Measures on Science
Archives
Blogroll
SHARP
The Scientists and Engineers for America's SHARP network allows you to click on the map to see where your candidates stand on important science issues.
« Our First YouTube Challenge Entries! | Main | Marine Biologist, Mark Westneat endorses Obama »
The Battleground States
Category: Presidential Candidate
Posted on: October 16, 2008 9:22 AM, by Sheril R. Kirshenbaum
Comments
~475 nm is good. 475 electoral votes would be even sweeter ;-)
Posted by: Coturnix | October 16, 2008 9:48 AM
475nm? NERD! Sheril, I love your stuff, delightfully nerdy. The whitening of WV and pinking of Indiana seem premature though.
Posted by: Michael Stebbins | October 16, 2008 12:33 PM
Premature? Yes, by about a week in the case of Indiana.
http://www.electoral-vote.com/
Posted by: David Marjanović | October 25, 2008 8:46 AM