..appear to be shifting toward ~475 nm.
A Vote For Science
Science Policy and Debate in the 2008 Presidential Election
Profile
With less than two months left before the next U.S. president is elected, ScienceBlogs wanted to dedicate a space to campaign politics. A Vote For Science is a group blog that will focus on the candidates' science policies. It is managed by many interested ScienceBloggers, as well as guest blogger Ivan Oelrich of the Federation of American Scientists.
Search
Recent Posts
- Stimulus for the humanities: Zero-sum gentrification for urban hipsters?
- ONDCP Booted from Obama's Cabinet
- Does the US need a Culture Czar?
- Obama to undo Bush anti-science policies
- Results for State Ballot Measures on Science
- Happy Election Day! GO VOTE!
- Our First AVoteForScience Couple!
- Massive number of OpEds endorsing Obama because of policies on science
- Nobel Laureate, Murray Gell-Mann endorses Obama
- 76 Nobel Laureates in Science Endorse Obama!
Recent Comments
- plyometric training on Massive number of OpEds endorsing Obama because of policies on science
- plyometric training on ONDCP Booted from Obama's Cabinet
- Colon Cleanse on 61 Nobel Laureates in Science Endorse Obama
- Colon Cleanse on Houston, we have a problem: Attending to structure and process of science and science education policy
- Jeanie on Enshrining homophobia in California, Arizona and Florida
- kilo aldirici on ONDCP Booted from Obama's Cabinet
- red rabbit on ONDCP Booted from Obama's Cabinet
- boy uzatma on Francis Collins, former head of the Human Genome Project, endorses Obama
- kilo aldirici on 76 Nobel Laureates in Science Endorse Obama!
- Jira - Dog biscuit recipes on 76 Nobel Laureates in Science Endorse Obama!
Archives
Blogroll
SHARP
The Scientists and Engineers for America's SHARP network allows you to click on the map to see where your candidates stand on important science issues.

« Our First YouTube Challenge Entries! | Main | Marine Biologist, Mark Westneat endorses Obama »
The Battleground States
Category: Presidential Candidate
Posted on: October 16, 2008 9:22 AM, by Sheril R. Kirshenbaum
Share on: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More





Comments
~475 nm is good. 475 electoral votes would be even sweeter ;-)
Posted by: Coturnix | October 16, 2008 9:48 AM
475nm? NERD! Sheril, I love your stuff, delightfully nerdy. The whitening of WV and pinking of Indiana seem premature though.
Posted by: Michael Stebbins | October 16, 2008 12:33 PM
Premature? Yes, by about a week in the case of Indiana.
http://www.electoral-vote.com/
Posted by: David Marjanović | October 25, 2008 8:46 AM