Seed Media Group

A Vote For Science

Science Policy and Debate in the 2008 Presidential Election

Search this blog

Profile

sblogo-50.jpg With less than two months left before the next U.S. president is elected, ScienceBlogs wanted to dedicate a space to campaign politics. A Vote For Science is a group blog that will focus on the candidates' science policies. It is managed by many interested ScienceBloggers, as well as guest blogger Ivan Oelrich of the Federation of American Scientists.

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

SHARP

The Scientists and Engineers for America's SHARP network allows you to click on the map to see where your candidates stand on important science issues.

map.jpg

« Disaster---McCain's health care plan will ruin us all | Main | "I am a scientist and I am voting for" YouTube Challenge! »

Francis Collins, former head of the Human Genome Project, endorses Obama

Category: Presidential Candidate
Posted on: October 10, 2008 1:04 PM, by Michael Stebbins

francis-collins.jpgFrancis Collins, the former Director of the National Human Genome Research Institute and lead on the Human Genome Project has just published an opinion piece in the Virginian Pilot endorsing Barack Obama. Unfortunately the Pilot does not post their guest opinion pieces online, but a good friend in Virginia scanned a copy in for me. It is not a great quality scan, but it is good enough to read.

What is striking to me about it is not just that a rather apolitical scientist of his stature came out to endorse Obama, but that he did it in a Virginia paper with far less profile than he could have gotten. He rationalizes it by explaining that he is from Virginia, but I thought that was particularly cool. I was also struck by the fact that it is perhaps the most reasoned and dignified explanation of a political endorsement that I have ever read. He focuses on the strengths of the Obama plan for science and technology rather than beating up on McCain and Palin. Although he makes it clear that he considered both carefully.

"Sen. Obama has provided a detailed plan for his science technology and innovation agenda, which lays out how advances in science can provide solutions to many of the big problems that face us."

He makes it clear that McCain's plan is rather inferior.
"As I have examined the positions taken by the current Presidential candidates on these critical issues, I regret to say that I have found little comfort in Sen. John McCain's plan."

Add this to the 63 Nobelists who have now endorsed Obama. The McCain campaign has really missed an opportunity here and really ought to do everything they can to give more details on his plans for science. I really don't want this to be a partisan blog, so PLEASE, anyone who knows of any serious scientists endorsing McCain, please let us know. In the mean time, check out Francis Collins OpEd HERE.

Related Stories:

Francis Collins steps down from NHGRI

Marty Chalfie endorses Obama

Comments

I think the link in "check out Francis Collins OpEd HERE." is not right since it only brings me to a photo of him. Thanks.

Posted by: bumblebrain | October 10, 2008 1:29 PM

Thanks. I fixed it.

Posted by: Michael Stebbins | October 10, 2008 1:41 PM

The McCain campaign has really missed an opportunity here and really ought to do everything they can to give more details on his plans for science.
He's given me enough information by using the presidential debates to mock a legitimate wildlife study (bear DNA) and a planetarium star theatre projector ("overhead projector"). To John McCain, science and science education are objects of ridicule.

Posted by: Reginald Selkirk | October 10, 2008 3:39 PM

I agree with Reginald. McCain has not only provided no clear plan for advancing scientific research and science education, but has shown complete disdain for science. He has chosen to side, instead, with the growing anti-intellectual movement that is taking over the conservative far right. We cannot afford more of the same with regard to science in this country.

Posted by: jeremiah | October 13, 2008 12:41 PM

He may have chosen the VA paper given the fact that MD is already likely to go Obama, while VA is considered a "battleground" state

Posted by: Mike | October 13, 2008 3:25 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Most Active

  1. Ray Comfort gets it half right 12.01.2008 · PZ Myers
  2. I'm sure it was just an unfortunate pratfall 12.01.2008 · PZ Myers
  3. Catholic Theocrats 12.01.2008 · Ed Brayton
  4. Anti-blasphemy = anti-free speech 12.01.2008 · Orac
  5. A simple question 12.01.2008 · DrugMonkey

Search All Blogs