Now on ScienceBlogs: HeartlandGate: Anti-Science Institute's Insider Reveals Secrets

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

A Vote For Science

Science Policy and Debate in the 2008 Presidential Election

Profile

sblogo-50.jpg With less than two months left before the next U.S. president is elected, ScienceBlogs wanted to dedicate a space to campaign politics. A Vote For Science is a group blog that will focus on the candidates' science policies. It is managed by many interested ScienceBloggers, as well as guest blogger Ivan Oelrich of the Federation of American Scientists.

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

SHARP

The Scientists and Engineers for America's SHARP network allows you to click on the map to see where your candidates stand on important science issues.

map.jpg

« Results for State Ballot Measures on Science | Main

Obama to undo Bush anti-science policies

Category: Science Policy
Posted on: November 10, 2008 7:37 AM, by Greg Laden

From the BBC:

US President-elect Barack Obama will seek to reverse Bush administration policies when he enters office on 20 January, his transition chief has said.

John Podesta said executive orders by President George W Bush on issues such as stem cell research and oil drilling were at odds with Mr Obama's views.

Plans to pass a raft of last-minute regulations are also being watched. ...

Read the rest here.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Politics

Comments

Okay, there is one thing that really bothers me about much of this "Bush is anti-science" stuff, people often cite Bush's philosophy of anti-science with his views on Stem Cell research.

The problem is, whether or not to support Stem Cell Research is more of a moral question then a science question.

(Not saying knowledge about the field is irrelevant though, knowing an embryo has no nervous system,hence no brain, is rather important)

Posted by: Starwatcher162536 | February 18, 2009 10:29 PM

Whether or not to support Stem Cell Research is more of a moral question then a science question, especially when the science is unproven.

Posted by: Neo | November 10, 2010 1:59 PM

I am a traveller from the year 2011! How is that pro-science president of yours doing.. You know, the one who trashed NASA and dumped any future space program... USA... Once a shining beacon to all of the free world... Now being reduced to a third world tin-pot republic under the guise of "PROGRESSIVISM"...

Posted by: Spam iLike | July 23, 2011 11:16 PM

I hope it would have brought a good change regarding science polices..

Posted by: Nokia Mobile | January 24, 2012 2:11 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.